Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: New Orleans Terrorist Attack
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
(01-05-2025, 02:55 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-05-2025, 10:49 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]Not true Marty. You started it at post #34, the first and only mention of Trump in the thread.  You've provided no evidence of Trump's "allegation", nor would it even be relevant.

Forget Trump (and Biden), let go of your TDS, and look at the FACTS of the case, then move on to conclusions.  

The tread is about the attack, NOT about Trump's reaction to the attack.

Wat!!!!

Trump did allege the criminal was an illegal of Jan 2.  Marty isn't wrong.

https://x.com/JDVance/status/1874483694301565213

To be fair, if he was going by what Fix News initially said about the driver/truck coming across the border, that's what his reaction was based on. He's probably forgotten what he said already. Who knows. 

Shame on Fox for their knee jerk reaction. This is just one reason why 'breaking news' is not reliable anymore and hasn't been for a very long time. Trying to 'break' a story before competitors degrades journalistic integrity just as much as disinformation and misinformation. They seemed to be more concerned with pointing out a failure of the Biden administration than facts and that provides fodder for the left and makes Fox look foolish.

I don't care who puts a story out first as long as they are publishing the facts to the best of their research ability. A lot can change during the course of a 'breaking news' story as more facts come out and that's understandable, but putting info out just to be the first or to serve as click bait is disingenuous.

(01-05-2025, 02:55 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-05-2025, 10:49 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]Not true Marty. You started it at post #34, the first and only mention of Trump in the thread.  You've provided no evidence of Trump's "allegation", nor would it even be relevant.

Forget Trump (and Biden), let go of your TDS, and look at the FACTS of the case, then move on to conclusions.  

The tread is about the attack, NOT about Trump's reaction to the attack.

Wat!!!!

Trump did allege the criminal was an illegal of Jan 2.  Marty isn't wrong.

https://x.com/JDVance/status/1874483694301565213

To be fair, if he was going by what Fix News initially said about the driver/truck coming across the border, that's what his reaction was based on. He's probably forgotten what he said already. Who knows. 

Shame on Fox for their knee jerk reaction. This is just one reason why 'breaking news' is not reliable anymore and hasn't been for a very long time. Trying to 'break' a story before competitors degrades journalistic integrity just as much as disinformation and misinformation. They seemed to be more concerned with pointing out a failure of the Biden administration than facts and that provides fodder for the left and makes Fox look foolish.

I don't care who puts a story out first as long as they are publishing the facts to the best of their research ability. A lot can change during the course of a 'breaking news' story as more facts come out and that's understandable, but putting info out just to be the first or to serve as click bait is disingenuous.
(01-06-2025, 11:58 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-05-2025, 02:55 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Wat!!!!

Trump did allege the criminal was an illegal of Jan 2.  Marty isn't wrong.

https://x.com/JDVance/status/1874483694301565213

To be fair, if he was going by what Fix News initially said about the driver/truck coming across the border, that's what his reaction was based on. He's probably forgotten what he said already. Who knows. 

Shame on Fox for their knee jerk reaction. This is just one reason why 'breaking news' is not reliable anymore and hasn't been for a very long time. Trying to 'break' a story before competitors degrades journalistic integrity just as much as disinformation and misinformation. They seemed to be more concerned with pointing out a failure of the Biden administration than facts and that provides fodder for the left and makes Fox look foolish.

I don't care who puts a story out first as long as they are publishing the facts to the best of their research ability. A lot can change during the course of a 'breaking news' story as more facts come out and that's understandable, but putting info out just to be the first or to serve as click bait is disingenuous.

I also think this applies to Trump.  He needs to rein in his posts and stop his knee jerk reactions.  You can be critical of Biden, but his response to this was spot on, something along the lines of....I have spoken all of the agencies and will have more to say later.
(01-06-2025, 02:10 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LMks-6t3Bk

Dude, no one's watching 41 minutes of some smurf watching youtube vids.  Can you give us a summary of what the video is about.
(01-06-2025, 03:17 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-06-2025, 11:58 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair, if he was going by what Fix News initially said about the driver/truck coming across the border, that's what his reaction was based on. He's probably forgotten what he said already. Who knows. 

Shame on Fox for their knee jerk reaction. This is just one reason why 'breaking news' is not reliable anymore and hasn't been for a very long time. Trying to 'break' a story before competitors degrades journalistic integrity just as much as disinformation and misinformation. They seemed to be more concerned with pointing out a failure of the Biden administration than facts and that provides fodder for the left and makes Fox look foolish.

I don't care who puts a story out first as long as they are publishing the facts to the best of their research ability. A lot can change during the course of a 'breaking news' story as more facts come out and that's understandable, but putting info out just to be the first or to serve as click bait is disingenuous.

I also think this applies to Trump.  He needs to rein in his posts and stop his knee jerk reactions.  You can be critical of Biden, but his response to this was spot on, something along the lines of....I have spoken all of the agencies and will have more to say later.

I agree 100% but we already know it won't happen.
(01-06-2025, 03:24 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-06-2025, 02:10 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LMks-6t3Bk

Dude, no one's watching 41 minutes of some smurf watching youtube vids.  Can you give us a summary of what the video is about.

Sean Ryan interview detailing the Tesla truck Trump tower event. The drones being linked to China. 1,000+ active terrorists already within our border and ready to become martyrs, potential WWIII, etc. 

Just get you a beer and tune out. You don't have to watch it. Half the time I just listen to these videos while I am lifting weights, driving or doing [BLEEP] around the house.
Bourbon Street terror victims sue New Orleans as Louisiana AG investigates security lapses
Victims say New Year's attack by Shamsud-Din Jabbar could have been prevented

Dozens of victims of the New Year's terrorist attack on Bourbon Street in New Orleans are filing lawsuits against the city and its police department.

Terrorist Shamsud-Din Jabbar of Texas killed 14 civilians and injured dozens of others when he rammed a Ford-150 through crowds of people celebrating New Year's on the famous New Orleans street around 3 a.m. Jan. 1. Jabbar was killed in a shootout with police.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/bourbon-stree...ity-lapses
The FBI special agent responsible for contradicting everyone by saying it was not a terrorist attack is reassigned. The agency has now admitted it was a terrorist attack. Why were they not fired?

https://nypost.com/2025/01/17/us-news/fb...eassigned/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-assistant...reassigned
(01-18-2025, 12:31 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The FBI special agent responsible for contradicting everyone by saying it was not a terrorist attack is reassigned. The agency has now admitted it was a terrorist attack. Why were they not fired?

https://nypost.com/2025/01/17/us-news/fb...eassigned/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-assistant...reassigned

I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.
(01-18-2025, 12:29 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:31 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The FBI special agent responsible for contradicting everyone by saying it was not a terrorist attack is reassigned. The agency has now admitted it was a terrorist attack. Why were they not fired?

https://nypost.com/2025/01/17/us-news/fb...eassigned/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-assistant...reassigned

I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.

Actually I am surprise they didn't try to blame right wing Nazi fascist mothers attending school board meetings. The FBI currently a stinking fish that stinks beginning at the head. The whole organization needs a rebuild. Heck it could just be easier to eliminate it and start over.
(01-18-2025, 12:57 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:29 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.

Actually I am surprise they didn't try to blame right wing Nazi fascist mothers attending school board meetings. The FBI currently a stinking fish that stinks beginning at the head. The whole organization needs a rebuild. Heck it could just be easier to eliminate it and start over.

My first impression is it was an automatic reaction to provide cover for the administration. We're seeing more and more of the deep state bureaucracy acting on political interests. Washington needs an enema.
(01-18-2025, 12:29 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:31 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The FBI special agent responsible for contradicting everyone by saying it was not a terrorist attack is reassigned. The agency has now admitted it was a terrorist attack. Why were they not fired?

https://nypost.com/2025/01/17/us-news/fb...eassigned/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-assistant...reassigned

I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.
(01-18-2025, 12:57 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:29 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.

Actually I am surprise they didn't try to blame right wing Nazi fascist mothers attending school board meetings. The FBI currently a stinking fish that stinks beginning at the head. The whole organization needs a rebuild. Heck it could just be easier to eliminate it and start over.
(01-18-2025, 03:08 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:57 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Actually I am surprise they didn't try to blame right wing Nazi fascist mothers attending school board meetings. The FBI currently a stinking fish that stinks beginning at the head. The whole organization needs a rebuild. Heck it could just be easier to eliminate it and start over.

My first impression is it was an automatic reaction to provide cover for the administration. We're seeing more and more of the deep state bureaucracy acting on political interests. Washington needs an enema.
She probably got reassigned for telling the truth .... FBI probably involved like usual

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(01-18-2025, 08:03 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:29 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.
(01-18-2025, 12:57 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Actually I am surprise they didn't try to blame right wing Nazi fascist mothers attending school board meetings. The FBI currently a stinking fish that stinks beginning at the head. The whole organization needs a rebuild. Heck it could just be easier to eliminate it and start over.
(01-18-2025, 03:08 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]My first impression is it was an automatic reaction to provide cover for the administration. We're seeing more and more of the deep state bureaucracy acting on political interests. Washington needs an enema.
She probably got reassigned for telling the truth .... FBI probably involved like usual

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

I'm not going there. There is a stratum of ideological dolts within the ranks, but nothing rises to the level of killing fellow Americans. Step away from the edge.
(01-18-2025, 08:30 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 08:03 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]She probably got reassigned for telling the truth .... FBI probably involved like usual

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

I'm not going there. There is a stratum of ideological dolts within the ranks, but nothing rises to the level of killing fellow Americans. Step away from the edge.
It was a joke but it could end up being true as lately all of them are known to the FBI

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(01-18-2025, 12:29 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-18-2025, 12:31 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The FBI special agent responsible for contradicting everyone by saying it was not a terrorist attack is reassigned. The agency has now admitted it was a terrorist attack. Why were they not fired?

https://nypost.com/2025/01/17/us-news/fb...eassigned/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-assistant...reassigned

I’m genuinely puzzled as to why she made such a declaration when it was so clear this was a terrorist attack. The ISIS flag attached to the antenna of the truck couldn’t have made it more obvious.

I assume she's either really dumb or was instructed to make the statement.  The default response should always be, "We're still gathering evidence, and it would be premature to make any assumptions until all the facts are known."
Pages: 1 2 3