Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Aetna to cut back 70% on Obamacare plans in 2017
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Story And they're not the only ones to drop exchanges.

 

"Aetna's announcement comes two weeks after the company booked $200 million in ACA-related pre-tax losses in its Q2 earnings report and nearly one month after the Department of Justice's anti-trust division sued to block the health insurer's acquisition of rival Humana (HUM).

 

Humana has also announced it will cut back sharply from the exchanges. Their pullback, in the wake of UnitedHealth (UNH)'s departure from all but a handful of exchanges, means that hundreds of thousands of Obamacare plan members will no longer have access to plans from the nation's three major insurers in 2017." 

 

This is something I actually wondered about when the whole idea came about. The government can threaten people with fines and whatnot for not enrolling in a health care plan, but what about insurance companies who don't want to participate, especially because they're losing money hand over fist?


 

Aetna CEO Marc Bertolini said this, "the problem is that ACA plan members tend to incur high medical costs, while the federal risk adjustment program meant to offset losses on those members has not been adequate. As a result, many insurers are losing money on the exchanges.

 

"More than 40 (health insurance) payers of various sizes have similarly chosen to stop selling plans in one or more rating areas in the individual public exchanges over the 2015 and 2016 plan years, collectively exiting hundreds of rating areas in more than 30 states," he said. 

 

HHS officials said despite Aetna's abrupt exit from 11 state exchange markets, Obamacare will still have a choice of three or more plans in many of those markets next year.

 

In Texas, there will still be nearly a dozen health insurers offering plans on the exchange, while in Ohio there will still be 10 insurers on the exchange for 2017. In Georgia, where both Aetna and UnitedHealth are pulling out of the state exchange, five health insurers right now plan to offer ACA plans in 2017.

 

And what do the folks who live in this area where there won't be options? What is the government/IRS going to do to them? They can't have what isn't available.


 

But in some cases, competition will be greatly reduced. In Arizona, where Aetna and United are both pulling out, the state's Blue Cross Blue Shield provider is cutting back in some counties. If state officials can't convince any of the insurers to stay, analysts say some counties could be left with no exchange plan coverage next year. 

 

My husband and I are fortunate enough to have insurance through his employer but who knows how long that will last. We just found out that, thanks to Obamacare, they will no longer offer retirees a health care package beginning next fiscal year, which for them begins in July. And it's not a freebie, the retirees do pay a monthly premium though it's not as much as working employees. If they are willing to do this they might decide to not offer employees coverage at some point.


 

BCBS, the largest health insurer in NC is looking to increase their rates by 34%, up from 25% they were considering in June. The reason for their increase is the same as Aetna's for dropping exchanges.....This from the News & Observer here in NC:


 

"Blue Cross continues to see a large number of chronically ill people who require expensive medical care this year, the second year of ACA enrollments, said Patrick Getzen, the insurer’s chief actuary. The ACA made it illegal for health insurers to turn down people with pre-existing conditions and charge older customers exorbitant rates, common practices in the past that helped insurers control their expenses.
 
That's all well and good but here's the rub....the reason it's failing miserably.

 
The architects of the health insurance law anticipated an influx of older, sicker customers, but expected that the cost of treating them would be offset by attracting younger and healthier customers. That hasn’t worked out for Blue Cross so far, despite the company’s marketing campaign to attract “young invincibles” and federal penalties for those who fail to obtain health insurance." 
 
NC is also one of the states being dropped by Aetna in 2017 regarding exchanges. I imagine if enough companies drop exchanges, at some point Obamacare is going to implode. Sorry for the longer than planned rant. If you made it to this point I thank you.

 
I have been taking a medical billing and coding course and near the end and am learning about insurance companies, federal and state funded ones in detail, and others on a basic level. With all of the federal and state funded programs that covers a large number of folks there was no need for the government to step in and 'help' anyone.

 
In fact, the people they're trying to 'help' are the ones getting screwed over the most. There is nothing affordable about any of it and health care costs are not being controlled at all. I appreciate that insurance companies can no longer deny folks who have preexisting conditions and that all insurance must have mental health as part of the package, but the rest of it is worthless. The few good things about it could have been mandated into the insurance world without going full [BLEEP] with the rest. 

This was always part of the plan.  All of the major insurers are bailing on his signature legislation, and he's perfectly fine with that.

Quote:Obama's effort is going precisely as planned.
Single payer health care, here comes the USA! Maybe you should ask Canada to run it, they seem to be doing alright. 
Quote:Single payer health care, here comes the USA! Maybe you should ask Canada to run it, they seem to be doing alright. 
 

Single payer would be better than this abomination we have now, and single payer with our already bloated economy is a terrible idea.

 

Canada has 1/10th the population size, isn't responsible for being the world police, doesn't have soaring poverty levels, doesn't have a wide-scale decline in labor participation, isn't suffering from major sectors of the economy leaving for other countries, and doesn't have massive trade deficits. There are quite a few reasons why Canada can run with single payer and we, at the moment, cannot.
Quote:Single payer health care, here comes the USA! Maybe you should ask Canada to run it, they seem to be doing alright. 
 

But waiting lists and death panels! They even have waiting lists for the death panels!
Quote:Single payer would be better than this abomination we have now, and single payer with our already bloated economy is a terrible idea.

 

Canada has 1/10th the population size, isn't responsible for being the world police, doesn't have soaring poverty levels, doesn't have a wide-scale decline in labor participation, isn't suffering from major sectors of the economy leaving for other countries, and doesn't have massive trade deficits. There are quite a few reasons why Canada can run with single payer and we, at the moment, cannot.
Turns out that moderate socialism you hear Canadians and Europeans talking about aint that bad after all huh?
100% of my spending on "health care" goes to ObamaCare fines. 

Quote:Turns out that moderate socialism you hear Canadians and Europeans talking about aint that bad after all huh?
 

No. They are terrible and part of the reason why we are in our current failed economic situation.
"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

"affordable"

...

 

 

Not so much.

Quote:100% of my spending on "health care" goes to ObamaCare fines. 
 

Not so bad this year (but more than last.)  Spikes next year.

 

The many of us caught up in layoffs recently have suffered through this.  Cheaper to pay the fine than buy a crap policy that's extremely overpriced.

 

Thanks to governmental meddling in areas of non-expertise.  Same as it ever was.  Why can't folks learn from history?
Quote:No. They are terrible and part of the reason why we are in our current failed economic situation.
 

Haven't you heard?

 

Lowest participation rates in decades, unprecedented consistently declining GDP, and record food stamp rolls are the "new normal" of  this "remarkable" economic "growth."
Quote:Haven't you heard?


Lowest participation rates in decades, unprecedented consistently declining GDP, and record food stamp rolls are the "new normal" of this "remarkable" economic "growth."


35 years of free trade and trickle down economics.
Quote:35 years of free trade and trickle down economics.
 

The trade deficit is more recent than that. It didn't explode until Clinton took office and nose-dived under Bush (thanks NAFTA). I am not sure how wealth can trickle down in the US when entire job markets are being outsourced to 2nd/3rd-world nations who manipulate their currency to keep wages low. I guess you can say the trickle down is in these foreign nations. Regardless, there are a lot of factors that contribute to this but to just blame free trade and "trickle down economics" is a lefty buzz phrase. Overly free trade does have some blame, but free trade can be extremely beneficial when trading with equally industrialized nations who do not inhibit the trade of goods between each other.
Quote:35 years of free trade and trickle down economics.
 

What are, two things that actually work.

 

Try again.  The rising tide raises all ships.  It's proven.  Again, any competent student of history would know that.

 

Marxism does the opposite... which we're experiencing now with the socio/economic meddling.  Like the current destruction of our healthcare system.  The economic drag that's had is quite evident.

 

That's precisely why the last 8 years have been so anemic.  Better policy would have had us at double that "growth," and without the incompetent, meteoric rise in debt as well.

Quote:The trade deficit is more recent than that. It didn't explode until Clinton took office and nose-dived under Bush (thanks NAFTA). I am not sure how wealth can trickle down in the US when entire job markets are being outsourced to 2nd/3rd-world nations who manipulate their currency to keep wages low. I guess you can say the trickle down is in these foreign nations. Regardless, there are a lot of factors that contribute to this but to just blame free trade and "trickle down economics" is a lefty buzz phrase. Overly free trade does have some blame, but free trade can be extremely beneficial when trading with equally industrialized nations who do not inhibit the trade of goods between each other.
 

[Image: a19e777329b8547e6250457d2740620a.jpg]
Quote:What are, two things that actually work.


Try again. The rising tide raises all ships. It's proven. Again, any competent student of history would know that.


Marxism does the opposite... which we're experiencing now with the socio/economic meddling. Like the current destruction of our healthcare system. The economic drag that's had is quite evident.


That's precisely why the last 8 years have been so anemic. Better policy would have had us at double that "growth," and without the incompetent, meteoric rise in debt as well.


Lol!!


Supply side economics works??? Lol, good one.


If it works so well, provide proof.


A rising tide-- that's empty headed rhetoric that has no real meaning.


You do yourself a disservice by spouting decades old propaganda that has been disproven.


I'm not sure why you equate Marxism with Obama care, unless you think your mental masters at the Heritage Foundation whom have turned you into a hate filled puppet of their corporate globalist worldview is now considered Marxist...


You talk about students of history. What you need is to become a student of economics.


With all due respect, of course.


The fact is the stagnation we have is all based on conservative economic policy. Lower taxes for the rich and multinational corporations has done one thing very well--hose the workers and make the rich even richer than they ever dreamed.
Quote:The trade deficit is more recent than that. It didn't explode until Clinton took office and nose-dived under Bush (thanks NAFTA). I am not sure how wealth can trickle down in the US when entire job markets are being outsourced to 2nd/3rd-world nations who manipulate their currency to keep wages low. I guess you can say the trickle down is in these foreign nations. Regardless, there are a lot of factors that contribute to this but to just blame free trade and "trickle down economics" is a lefty buzz phrase. Overly free trade does have some blame, but free trade can be extremely beneficial when trading with equally industrialized nations who do not inhibit the trade of goods between each other.


The move toward free trade began under Reagan. Remember GATT?


That was the beginning of it, and it was under Raygun. And deficits truly began taking off under that traitor.


It continued on with HW Bush and Clinton, but the conservative vision that brought us here began under that guy.
Quote:Lol!!


Supply side economics works??? Lol, good one.


If it works so well, provide proof.


A rising tide-- that's empty headed rhetoric that has no real meaning.


You do yourself a disservice by spouting decades old propaganda that has been disproven.


I'm not sure why you equate Marxism with Obama care, unless you think your mental masters at the Heritage Foundation whom have turned you into a hate filled puppet of their corporate globalist worldview is now considered Marxist...


You talk about students of history. What you need is to become a student of economics.


With all due respect, of course.


The fact is the stagnation we have is all based on conservative economic policy. Lower taxes for the rich and multinational corporations has done one thing very well--hose the workers and make the rich even richer than they ever dreamed.
 

History shows it works.  I can't teach those unwilling to learn.

 

There hasn't been conservative economic policy since Reagan, and the congress of 1994.  The largest periods of growth during our time.

 

What is it that's made you so misguided and unable to accept truth?  Hate?  Brainwashing?
hurray for libertarianism.  You silly liberals and conservatives are doing it wrong.

Pages: 1 2