Last year I got kilt when I made a thread and suggested that maybe all but 5-7 teams in the NFL would trade their QB for Bortles. Many of you LOL'd. Perhaps rightfully so- I was projecting, but it was early.
Now, after the sophomore season he had, I'm wondering how many people still chuckle at the notion that the vast majority of GM's would trade their QB situation for our's.
May be easier to count the teams that wouldn't. Who ya got?
I could see Belichick trading for Bortles.
GB
OAK
MINN
TENN
IND
PHI
LA
TB
PITT
BAL
ATL
These would be the teams least likely to trade for Bortles, although you could make a reasonable argument that they could.
Quote:GB
OAK
MINN
TENN
IND
PHI
LA
TB
PITT
BAL
ATL
These would be the teams least likely to trade for Bortles, although you could make a reasonable argument that they could.
Minnesota? Brain injury much?
I would say stop starting useless threads.
Quote:Minnesota? Brain injury much?
I honestly am not impressed by Bridgewater. In a draft do over do you think if they were given a choice of between Bridgewater and Bortles they would take Bridgewater again?
Quote:I honestly am not impressed by Bridgewater. In a draft do over do you think if they were given a choice of between Bridgewater and Bortles they would take Bridgewater again?
Not a chance.
Quote:Last year I got kilt when I made a thread and suggested that maybe all but 5-7 teams in the NFL would trade their QB for Bortles. Many of you LOL'd. Perhaps rightfully so- I was projecting, but it was early.
Now, after the sophomore season he had, I'm wondering how many people still chuckle at the notion that the vast majority of GM's would trade their QB situation for our's.
May be easier to count the teams that wouldn't. Who ya got?
Do wut?
He said who would trade FOR Bortles, not trade him away. Appears there some confusion......
Quote:He said who would trade FOR Bortles, not trade him away. Appears there some confusion......
This thread is for people with IQs greater than their shoe size.
Quote:Not a chance.
So with further deliberation I would probably strike Minnesota from my list.
Quote:This thread is for people with IQs greater than their show size.
Show size.
The jokes write themselves on this board. I swear it.
I honestly still think at least half the league would decline a straight up trade for Bortles right now.
Would decline no question:
Packers
Colts
Seahawks
Panthers
Buccaneers
Titans
Rams
Eagles
Raiders
Would briefly consider because of age/cost but I still think would decline fairly quickly:
Patriots
Steelers
Saints
Chargers
Falcons
Would probably decline but should probably accept:
Giants
Ravens
Cowboys
Cardinals
Vikings
Would be a coin flip:
Bengals
Chiefs
Dolphins
Quote:I honestly still think at least half the league would decline a straight up trade for Bortles right now.
Would decline no question:
Packers
Colts
Seahawks
Panthers
Buccaneers
Titans
Rams
Eagles
Raiders
Would briefly consider because of age/cost but I still think would decline fairly quickly:
Patriots
Steelers
Saints
Chargers
Falcons
Would probably decline but should probably accept:
Giants
Ravens
Cowboys
Cardinals
Vikings
Would be a coin flip:
Bengals
Chiefs
Dolphins
How many of those same teams would turned down Teddy Bridgewater. lol Let me just say it would be more than half of the teams in the NFL
Why would you ever think of trading Blake Bortles? I hope this thread does nto jinx him.
Quote:I honestly am not impressed by Bridgewater. In a draft do over do you think if they were given a choice of between Bridgewater and Bortles they would take Bridgewater again?
in a draft do over for the Vikes Bortles was gone. But no question they would take Carr over Teddy and probably made it to the SB last year
When i read these threads all i can think of, is you guys smoke the best lol...
Declined:
GB
SEA
LA
CAR
TB
NE
PB
IND
OAK
In 2 years: PB, NE, LA and hopefully IND regret not taking the deal.
Quote:Declined:
GB
SEA
LA
CAR
TB
NE
PB
IND
OAK
In 2 years: PB, NE, LA and hopefully IND regret not taking the deal.
What team is PB?