06-29-2016, 08:09 AM
06-30-2016, 01:02 PM
From what little I have seen of Gray, he strikes me as being more reliable than DRob. From what little I have seen of Corey Grant, he strikes me as being more of a TD threat than DRob. One of these three won't make it, and my hunch is DRob will end up the odd back out.
We'll see though. Gray is not exactly a shoe-in over DRob, but I think he'd give them more overall options. Whatever happens, I wish they'd abide by NFL regulations by listing DRob at RB only instead of at RB/WR which is clearly an all-out lie.
We'll see though. Gray is not exactly a shoe-in over DRob, but I think he'd give them more overall options. Whatever happens, I wish they'd abide by NFL regulations by listing DRob at RB only instead of at RB/WR which is clearly an all-out lie.
06-30-2016, 03:33 PM
Quote: Whatever happens, I wish they'd abide by NFL regulations by listing DRob at RB only instead of at RB/WR which is clearly an all-out lie.
They have to because he wears 16.
06-30-2016, 08:50 PM
Quote:From what little I have seen of Gray, he strikes me as being more reliable than DRob. From what little I have seen of Corey Grant, he strikes me as being more of a TD threat than DRob. One of these three won't make it, and my hunch is DRob will end up the odd back out.The only TD threat that Corey Grant has shown to be is for the other team.
We'll see though. Gray is not exactly a shoe-in over DRob, but I think he'd give them more overall options. Whatever happens, I wish they'd abide by NFL regulations by listing DRob at RB only instead of at RB/WR which is clearly an all-out lie.
06-30-2016, 11:57 PM
Quote:They have to because he wears 16.
Ugh!
They really should make him pick a number between 20 and 49. Let's see... 38, 40, 43 and 45 are available, although the Jaguars don't have any RBs wearing numbers in the 40s meaning 38 would make the most sense. 28 and 32 are also available, but those were FT's and MJD's numbers respectively so the Jaguars probably don't care to hand those out.
07-01-2016, 09:04 AM
Quote:The only TD threat that Corey Grant has shown to be is for the other team.
But he's fast.....
07-01-2016, 09:45 AM
he can only go so far with this blocking. our blocking is not good.
07-01-2016, 10:33 AM
Quote:he can only go so far with this blocking. our blocking is not good.
Am I the only one who feels this argument is getting long in the tooth?
IMO, we've gone from well below average to average over the past few years.
07-01-2016, 10:40 AM
Quote:Am I the only one who feels this argument is getting long in the tooth?
IMO, we've gone from well below average to average over the past few years.
it's been poor for at least the past couple seasons. Yeldon brought somewhat of a boost, but the holes are just not there for most of the games.
the argument is not old. it's just been a long time since we were able to really move the pile.
07-01-2016, 10:54 AM
Quote:it's been poor for at least the past couple seasons. Yeldon brought somewhat of a boost, but the holes are just not there for most of the games.
the argument is not old. it's just been a long time since we were able to really move the pile.
It's obvious what your stance is and that it's quickset. Would rather discuss it with others willing to actually discuss it.
Our oline has been much worse in the past.
It's been a longer time since we've had a quality stable at RB. There's a difference between RBs not making plays and lines unable to move the pile. Yet, I feel both will be improved. With the additions we've made in both areas, it's the logical conclusion.
07-01-2016, 10:58 AM
Quote:They have to because he wears 16.
From OW to RB/WR to C (cut)
07-01-2016, 11:00 AM
Quote:It's obvious what your stance is and that it's quickset. Would rather discuss it with others willing to actually discuss it.
Our oline has been much worse in the past.
It's been a longer time since we've had a quality stable at RB. There's a difference between RBs not making plays and lines unable to move the pile. Yet, I feel both will be improved. With the additions we've made in both areas, it's the logical conclusion.
outside of Parnell and Linder, there isn't much I like about the line.
07-01-2016, 11:07 AM
Quote:outside of Parnell and Linder, there isn't much I like about the line.
What's the issue with Cann? He started most of the year and played well.
07-01-2016, 11:09 AM
Quote:The only TD threat that Corey Grant has shown to be is for the other team.
I half laugh and half cry at that one.
I was sitting a few rows up in that end zone and saw that disaster of a play. Ugh.
07-01-2016, 11:13 AM
Quote:What's the issue with Cann? He started most of the year and played well.Yep.
It's only left of center that raises concern.
Linder/Cann/Parnell should be deadly in the run game and provide adequate protection.
07-01-2016, 11:20 AM
Quote:What's the issue with Cann? He started most of the year and played well.
Double post- oops
07-02-2016, 12:53 AM
Quote:Ugh!
They really should make him pick a number between 20 and 49. Let's see... 38, 40, 43 and 45 are available, although the Jaguars don't have any RBs wearing numbers in the 40s meaning 38 would make the most sense. 28 and 32 are also available, but those were FT's and MJD's numbers respectively so the Jaguars probably don't care to hand those out.
It's more than that. DRob wears 16 to honor his brother who died when he was a kid.
07-02-2016, 01:01 AM
Quote:outside of Parnell and Linder, there isn't much I like about the line.
Cann says hey
07-03-2016, 09:18 PM
I watched all of jags games last year and TJ had a couple of good games. He does dance too much in the back field and he just does not have the extra break away speed when he gets to the 2nd level. He's had a couple of opportunities to take it to the house and he's always stumbling. Just what I saw.
07-03-2016, 10:32 PM
Quote:Cann says heyHe probably dont even know who Cann is. By some of his posts I question if he even watches football