Quote:Wilson carries his team more than Brees?
Wilson makes plays when they aren't there. If you think the Hawks make the SB two years in a row without Wilson, you're a fool.
Brees has always been a very good QB. Especially considering he has to tip toe to see over his Oline. Very accurate, spreads the ball around...
I'm not saying he isn't any good.
I'm just of the opinion that out of ALL the QBs in the league, he isn't a top 5 QB. Regardless of what stats you want to cherry pick through. Yes he gets a lot of yards. So does Stafford and Matt Ryan and these days in the pass happy NFL a lot of QBs get a lot of yards.
It takes more than that to be one of the premiere QBs in the league. Which Brees, no doubt in my mind, for a couple seasons was EASILY the 3rd best in the league.
Now? Not so much...
So why all the whining that QBs that ARE better than Brees, NOW, are ranked better than him?
The Saints without Brees likely aren't better... but the Saints with a better QB would be better.
A Wilson type QB could extend plays when the Oline breaks down. A mobile threat QB like that can pick up chunks of yards with his feet, whether by design or breakdown.
Rodgers can make every throw, is mobile, probably the best QB in the game today overall.
Manning and Brady are a couple of the smartest QBs to ever play the game and even if physically they aren't what they once were, they can destroy teams before the ball is snapped.
Big Ben, Joe Flacco, big strong arm QBs....
Brees is right where he belongs, at the top of "tier 2"
What does Breesy have? He's accurate? C'mon man...