Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
41 Email Print CPS Removes 10 Children From Homestead Of Family Living ‘Off The Grid’ In Kentucky

#41

Quote:Why is a big family irresponsible? They've said the conditions they are in is temporary while they build a more permanent structure. I know it's outside the norm but if there's no abuse and the children are not in physical danger I tend to side with the parents, let them live as they see fit.


secondly when did responsibly become a condition of keeping your children, hell we have a whole lot of kids to grab up if we're only letting responsible people be parents.


Honestly, I don't know enough about the situation to really give a valid opinion. I'm just saying some things contradict themselves. Their family friend is raising money for their legal fees (that makes sense) and upgrades to home. If they are living intentionally then why would they need upgrades to their home? I guess my point is having 10 kids with another on the way is expensive, time consuming, etc... and that is hard to do in good conditions. Are they living this way by choice or doing so because they don't have the money to live any other way? Anyways, I don't disagree with you necessarily, but it just seems excessive to have that many kids and increases the hardship they face in those condtions.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

Quote:Honestly, I don't know enough about the situation to really give a valid opinion. I'm just saying some things contradict themselves. Their family friend is raising money for their legal fees (that makes sense) and upgrades to home. If they are living intentionally then why would they need upgrades to their home? I guess my point is having 10 kids with another on the way is expensive, time consuming, etc... and that is hard to do in good conditions. Are they living this way by choice or doing so because they don't have the money to live any other way? Anyways, I don't disagree with you necessarily, but it just seems excessive to have that many kids and increases the hardship they face in those condtions.
 

They're Mormons and IIRC Mormons believe all forms of birth control is equal to abortion so they have LOTS of kids. It says in most of the articles I've read ( I just started looking into this a few days ago myself) They are in the process of building a permanent structure on the property but they're doing it themselves I guess? So it makes sense the upgrading the home needs funding, the whole back to basics thing is about homesteading. They're into the same concept I practice with raising my own poultry, harvesting my own vegetables and fruits, they go a little further with no electricity and no running water then myself but it's the same concept.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#43

Quote: 

1. Not an inclosed structure (only has 3 walls)

 
 

Not sure this is so, a building can have 3 sides if its triangular.

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#44

Quote:Not sure this is so, a building can have 3 sides if its triangular.
 

Good point but this one is doesn't I stand corrected on the previous statement.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#45

Quote:They're Mormons and IIRC Mormons believe all forms of birth control is equal to abortion so they have LOTS of kids. It says in most of the articles I've read ( I just started looking into this a few days ago myself) They are in the process of building a permanent structure on the property but they're doing it themselves I guess? So it makes sense the upgrading the home needs funding, the whole back to basics thing is about homesteading. They're into the same concept I practice with raising my own poultry, harvesting my own vegetables and fruits, they go a little further with no electricity and no running water then myself but it's the same concept.


I'm not in favor of state taking kids fyi.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46

Quote: 
Quote:Why is a big family irresponsible? They've said the conditions they are in is temporary while they build a more permanent structure. I know it's outside the norm but if there's no abuse and the children are not in physical danger I tend to side with the parents, let them live as they see fit.

 

secondly when did responsibly become a condition of keeping your children, hell we have a whole lot of kids to grab up if we're only letting responsible people be parents.
 

There's people who live off grid, and who unschool their children who say this family is doing a bad job.  It seems people are jumping into defend this family because they homeschool their children.  


The living conditions, even for an 'off the grid family' are terrible.  How long is it going to take them to build a more permanent structure?  Remember that 'cabin' (If you can even call it that) they're living in?  TWELVE people live in that.  TWELVE.  


Also - the Nauglers haven't met the conditions for homeschooling either.  The... really lenient kentucky homeschooling conditions.  The ones you posted earlier. They haven't filed any of the paperwork with the state.


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#47

Quote:There's people who live off grid, and who unschool their children who say this family is doing a bad job. It seems people are jumping into defend this family because they homeschool their children.


The living conditions, even for an 'off the grid family' are terrible. How long is it going to take them to build a more permanent structure? Remember that 'cabin' (If you can even call it that) they're living in? TWELVE people live in that. TWELVE.


Also - the Nauglers haven't met the conditions for homeschooling either. The... really lenient kentucky homeschooling conditions. The ones you posted earlier. They haven't filed any of the paperwork with the state.


There is certainly more to the story.

Reply

#48

Quote:There's people who live off grid, and who unschool their children who say this family is doing a bad job.  It seems people are jumping into defend this family because they homeschool their children.  


The living conditions, even for an 'off the grid family' are terrible.  How long is it going to take them to build a more permanent structure?  Remember that 'cabin' (If you can even call it that) they're living in?  TWELVE people live in that.  TWELVE.  


Also - the Nauglers haven't met the conditions for homeschooling either.  The... really lenient kentucky homeschooling conditions.  The ones you posted earlier. They haven't filed any of the paperwork with the state.
 

I hadn't seen that reported yet that would be a new update for sure. But I don't think that has anything to do with the kids being taken away, everything I've read on multiple reports refers to the living conditions being the reason the court oked the kids going into CPS custody while they look into it more.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#49

Quote:I'm thinking out loud the problems with the living conditions tell me if I'm missing one.

 

1. Not an inclosed structure (only has 3 walls)

2. No running water

3. No climate control

 

Plenty of people live without running water so that's not a reason to take the children so it's either the structure or the lack of climate control?
You have an extremely loose description of what walls are based on the picture you posted. That thing looks like a giant version of the shelters seen during the depression. It's very sad to think of children being raised in that intentionally. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#50

Quote:You have an extremely loose description of what walls are based on the picture you posted. That thing looks like a giant version of the shelters seen during the depression. It's very sad to think of children being raised in that intentionally. 
 

fair enough, I'm not defending the structure they're calling home just looking for what are the legal definitions we're using to say this structure is unacceptable. I think without a clear definition of WHY this families living condition is unacceptable we could open the door to all kinds of problems.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#51

Quote:fair enough, I'm not defending the structure they're calling home just looking for what are the legal definitions we're using to say this structure is unacceptable. I think without a clear definition of WHY this families living condition is unacceptable we could open the door to all kinds of problems.
I have stayed out of the conversations because I do not have kids so I do not think my opinion matters much. It is painful to think about those living conditions for children that have no choice in the matter though. 

Reply

#52

http://tstotopix.me/2014/02/08/topix-his...er-family/




                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#53

For me this goes back to one basic principle.  Freedom.

 

Why is it that the State or the Federal Government has the authority to determine how a family should live and/or be educated?  What good is government education if all it teaches is that every child must always come up with the "correct" answer?

 

Without knowing all of the details regarding this whole story, I don't approve of the government taking the children away.




There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#54
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2015, 05:46 PM by rollerjag.)

Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart famously once wrote "...hard-core [BAD WORD REMOVED] is hard to define..." but "I know it when I see it."

 

Intolerable and inhumane living conditions may be hard to define, but I think I know it when I see it, and I'm pretty sure I see it in that "cabin."


If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

#55
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2015, 06:17 PM by jtmoney.)

Quote:For me this goes back to one basic principle. Freedom.


Why is it that the State or the Federal Government has the authority to determine how a family should live and/or be educated? What good is government education if all it teaches is that every child must always come up with the "correct" answer?


Without knowing all of the details regarding this whole story, I don't approve of the government taking the children away.
Freedom? Lol that is just a word without meaning. We aren't free, just freeer.

Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!