Create Account

Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums The Gridiron The League Browns - 7 Picks In 1St 4 Rounds


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Browns - 7 Picks In 1St 4 Rounds

  • Offline StroudCrowd1
    Message Board Legend

  • ********
  • Posts: 26,225
    Threads: 510
    Joined: Jul 2005
    Reputation: 296
#1
10-03-2013, 09:36 PM (This post was last modified: 10-03-2013, 09:39 PM by StroudCrowd1.)

Yes, you read that right.

 

Does anybody see the Browns offering the Jags both of their 1st rounders to move into the 1st pick? If so, would you be happy with that?

 

Discuss.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline NYC4jags
    Jags Fanatic / Moderator

  • ******
  • Posts: 34,189
    Threads: 651
    Joined: May 2009
    Reputation: 1,116
#2
10-03-2013, 09:58 PM

Won't happen, but yeah - I'd like it.  

Reply

  • Offline Tuxedo
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,002
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Apr 2009
    Reputation: 29
#3
10-03-2013, 10:38 PM

No, Bridgewater is worth WAY more than getting a mid 20s pick for trading back a few spots. Just my opinion, but I can't imagine a realistic scenario where I'd trade the #1 pick.

Reply

  • Offline The Mad Dog
    Banned

  • Posts: 17,443
    Threads: 175
    Joined: Jan 2005
#4
10-04-2013, 12:29 AM (This post was last modified: 10-04-2013, 12:30 AM by The Mad Dog.)

Quote:No, Bridgewater is worth WAY more than getting a mid 20s pick for trading back a few spots. Just my opinion, but I can't imagine a realistic scenario where I'd trade the #1 pick.
 

Thank you. 

 

Someone with some sense. :thumbsup:

 

I don't want the Jags giving up Bridgewater unless the deal exceeds what the Redskins gave up for RG3

Reply

#5
10-04-2013, 01:09 AM

Given how the Browns have been doing lately... it'd take a lot more than their two firsts.  They could very well have their first pick in the teens.

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline Voltage-
    Rookie

  • ***
  • Posts: 434
    Threads: 0
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Reputation: 0
#6
10-04-2013, 04:08 AM

No. If we get the #1 pick, do not trade down under any reasonable circumstances. Only way I'd trade down is if we got what the Rams got and then some (I'm talking like 3 1sts, 3 2nds, and some 3rds).

 

 

We need a QB. Don't trade down. 

Reply

  • Offline roycee
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,113
    Threads: 31
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Reputation: 4
#7
10-04-2013, 05:26 AM

So much for the Browns tanking...

Reply

  • Offline JagFanatic24
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 15,793
    Threads: 803
    Joined: Feb 2009
    Reputation: 184
#8
10-04-2013, 07:59 AM

This franchise can't afford to give up the #1 pick overall. 

Reply

  • Offline Jags32250
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,355
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Sep 2010
    Reputation: 26
#9
10-04-2013, 08:29 AM

It'd take more than both there first rounders, but if they could package away enough high picks, i'd go for it.  This roster is in serious need of talent infusion and there are other franchise QBs in this draft as well as the next.  That being said, I really like Teddy so the offer would have to blow Caldwell away.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline Jags32250
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,355
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Sep 2010
    Reputation: 26
#10
10-04-2013, 08:30 AM

Quote:No. If we get the #1 pick, do not trade down under any reasonable circumstances. Only way I'd trade down is if we got what the Rams got and then some (I'm talking like 3 1sts, 3 2nds, and some 3rds).

 

 

We need a QB. Don't trade down. 
I would take that deal...

Reply

  • Offline The Mad Dog
    Banned

  • Posts: 17,443
    Threads: 175
    Joined: Jan 2005
#11
10-04-2013, 08:55 AM

Quote:No. If we get the #1 pick, do not trade down under any reasonable circumstances. Only way I'd trade down is if we got what the Rams got and then some (I'm talking like 3 1sts, 3 2nds, and some 3rds).

 

 

We need a QB. Don't trade down. 
 

Yep, exactly. Even if the Browns gave us all 7 of their highest picks in this years draft, it wouldn't be enough for me to make the deal. Bridgewater is that good. 

 

It would have to be a deal that exceeded what the Redskins gave up for RG3 that year for me to even begin to listen to offers. 
Reply

  • Offline Bon Jagley
    All Pro

  • ******
  • Posts: 6,864
    Threads: 174
    Joined: Nov 2002
    Reputation: 0
#12
10-04-2013, 09:42 AM

Quote:Yes, you read that right.

 

Does anybody see the Browns offering the Jags both of their 1st rounders to move into the 1st pick? If so, would you be happy with that?

 

Discuss.
 

This has been brought up multiple times on this board. The answer will always be no.
;

;
Reply

  • Offline Dark Passenger
    Journeyman

  • ****
  • Posts: 1,109
    Threads: 11
    Joined: Apr 2009
    Reputation: 1
#13
10-04-2013, 09:52 AM

Nope. If we end up with the #1 pick, please just take the QB, no matter what anyone offers.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline Bon Jagley
    All Pro

  • ******
  • Posts: 6,864
    Threads: 174
    Joined: Nov 2002
    Reputation: 0
#14
10-04-2013, 10:10 AM

Quote:Nope. If we end up with the #1 pick, please just take the QB, no matter what anyone offers.
 

Yeah, I don't get even making the suggestion. Some people are just scared to take a franchise QB I guess.
;

;
Reply

  • Offline The Mad Dog
    Banned

  • Posts: 17,443
    Threads: 175
    Joined: Jan 2005
#15
10-04-2013, 10:17 AM (This post was last modified: 10-04-2013, 10:18 AM by The Mad Dog.)

Quote:Nope. If we end up with the #1 pick, please just take the QB, no matter what anyone offers.
 

 

Quote:Yeah, I don't get even making the suggestion. Some people are just scared to take a franchise QB I guess.
 

Well, I wouldn't go as far to say "no matter what...."

 

But as said put it this way....

 

The compensation/ negotiations would have to ---start--- at more than what the Redskins gave up for RG3.

 

I mean, there comes a point where you'd have to start considering offers, but the price is uber steep. Otherwise, yes, just take Bridgewater. 

Reply

  • Offline Jags32250
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,355
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Sep 2010
    Reputation: 26
#16
10-04-2013, 10:42 AM

Quote:Well, I wouldn't go as far to say "no matter what...."

 

But as said put it this way....

 

The compensation/ negotiations would have to ---start--- at more than what the Redskins gave up for RG3.

 

I mean, there comes a point where you'd have to start considering offers, but the price is uber steep. Otherwise, yes, just take Bridgewater. 
I'm pretty sure that's how the Jags will see it too.

Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Forum software by © MyBB - Theme © iAndrew 2017

ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!