Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Even more outrageous waste of Tax payer money......

#1

Now, I feel if someone wants to change their anatomy through surgery, by all means, let them do it but...... This is an elective procedure and tax payer money should not be allocated for it.......

Biden expanding access to taxpayer-funded 'gender-affirming care' for federal employees

President Biden promoted gender-transition treatments as 'life-saving care' after GOP tried to ban hormone therapy for minors

The Biden administration is expanding the range of taxpayer-financed "gender-affirming" health care options available to federal employees, starting in 2023, according to an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) explanation of federal benefits released in late September.

"OPM continues to focus on ways our Carriers can improve access to gender-affirming care for transgender and gender diverse individuals," the agency said.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-e...-employees
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

This is a slippery slope. Pretty soon you'll have women who 'suffer clinical depression because they don't look 10 years younger and will require cosmetic surgery to improve her mental health.' Or a man will need HGH or testosterone to dig him out of his depression.

Meanwhile the rest of us are dealing with actual issues that don't qualify under the Woke program so we not only pay for their crap, but ours as well.

Bottom line though; if private insurance doesn't cover it or considers it elective taxpayers should not have to pay for it. I am not their insurance policy.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!