The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Honest opinion on what you think Dave's mindset is....
|
Quote:I will say that if Johnny doesn't declare, or both he and Teddy or gone before our pick, then we need to take Clowney. I don't like him but he's much better value than Bortles at 3. Well, I'll agree that we either have to take Clowney at 3 or trade the pick. WHat you CANNOT do at 3 is pass on Clowney and take someone like Barr or Matthews. Thats akin to leaving points on the field (to use a football analogy) We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Well, I'll agree that we either have to take Clowney at 3 or trade the pick.what's the issue with barr? from what i have heard and seen very raw but he is still learning the position however his physical abilities are very very high, may take more time to produce as a passrusher than clowney but could have a higher ceiling Quote:I think Clowney is Dave's #1 player on his board without a doubt. Followed by Bridgewater. After that I couldn't even guess. With the emphasis Dave has put on finding that franchise QB in recent interviews, I'd guess Bridgewater is #1 on his board. It wouldn't surprise me if Clowney is the next guy on that list, though. Quote:what's the issue with barr? TMD flipped his opinion, like he does so often, of Barr recently. Exhibit A: http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/top...r-clowney/ I think Clowney or Barr would excel in our defense. The only realistic pick at 3 I would be against is Jake Matthews. Quote:I'm new here....was it this bad during the Leftwich vs. Garrard deal? Much much worse during Leftwich v. Garrard. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
Quote:what's the issue with barr? Quote:With the emphasis Dave has put on finding that franchise QB in recent interviews, I'd guess Bridgewater is #1 on his board. It wouldn't surprise me if Clowney is the next guy on that list, though. Nothing was flipped. and nothings the matter with Barr. The point (which I'm not surprised flew over MoJo'44;s head like a Jumbo Jet, is that if you want to take Barr, you don't take him at 3 with Clowney still on the board, you trade down and maximize your value. Only a [BAD WORD REMOVED] like Gene Smith would sit at 3 and take a player like Barr over Clowney without trading down. My point wasn't that Barr isn't good. I like Barr. But good GM's work the draft and get need to meet value, not take their guy regardless of pick, just because they love the player. (Alualu) There will be demand for Clowney, so you take advantage of that. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.