More Democrat hypocrisy!! The party of tolerance right?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e...SKCN1QN2F9

I don't think the Democratic Party can actually bar candidates from appearing on Fox News, so if I was one of the 20 or so Democratic candidates I would definitely accept an invitation to appear in any kind of debate on Fox News in order to broaden my outreach to potential voters, whether the party apparatchiks like it or not.

---

Donna Brazile gave Hillary Clinton debate questions on 2 occasions. I can pretty much promise you this wouldn't happen on the GOP.

Tom Perez is out of his freaking mind. I have no idea what these people are thinking. You are literally only allowing debates in an echo chamber of Trump hating viewers. Good move.

---

More Democrat hypocrisy!! The party of tolerance right?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e...SKCN1QN2F9

I don't think the Democratic Party can actually bar candidates from appearing on Fox News, so if I was one of the 20 or so Democratic candidates I would definitely accept an invitation to appear in any kind of debate on Fox News in order to broaden my outreach to potential voters, whether the party apparatchiks like it or not.

While they couldn't technically bar a candidate, they could highly influence the candidate financially. They could refuse access to coordinated party funding for campaign expenditures. The whole thing is sad to the point of comical. They are worried about Fox News' integrity but are willing to run with a so called news organization like CNN, who by the way, got caught when Donna Brazile leaked debate questions to Clinton. It's all getting so rediculous and the party has become so open and brazen with their true intentions. The blind leading the blind.

---

Donna Brazile gave Hillary Clinton debate questions on 2 occasions. I can pretty much promise you this wouldn't happen on the GOP.  

Tom Perez is out of his freaking mind. I have no idea what these people are thinking. You are literally only allowing debates in an echo chamber of Trump hating viewers. Good move.

Tom Perez is a profane rabble rouser. Nothing more. He used this opportunity to help his cohorts in the MSM. By painting FoxNews as biased, the natural assumption is the MSM is not. See how that works? Not that it really matters. Anyone with half a brain knows the cozy relationship between the Democrats and the media. This does nothing more than cement that fact.

---

Donna Brazile gave Hillary Clinton debate questions on 2 occasions. I can pretty much promise you this wouldn't happen on the GOP.  

Tom Perez is out of his freaking mind. I have no idea what these people are thinking. You are literally only allowing debates in an echo chamber of Trump hating viewers. Good move.

Tom Perez is a profane rabble rouser. Nothing more. He used this opportunity to help his cohorts in the MSM. By painting FoxNews as biased, the natural assumption is the MSM is not. See how that works? Not that it really matters. Anyone with half a brain knows the cozy relationship between the Democrats and the media. This does nothing more than cement that fact.

Yep. the 2020 candidates can only be shielded from answering non-softball questions for so long. Also, everyone knows Chris Wallace loathes Trump, so them not giving Fox News a debate goes much further than "fairness".

---

I don't think the Democratic Party can actually bar candidates from appearing on Fox News, so if I was one of the 20 or so Democratic candidates I would definitely accept an invitation to appear in any kind of debate on Fox News in order to broaden my outreach to potential voters, whether the party apparatchiks like it or not.

While they couldn't technically bar a candidate, they could highly influence the candidate financially. They could refuse access to coordinated party funding for campaign expenditures. The whole thing is sad to the point of comical. They are worried about Fox News' integrity but are willing to run with a so called news organization like CNN, who by the way, got caught when Donna Brazile leaked debate questions to Clinton. It's all getting so rediculous and the party has become so open and brazen with their true intentions. The blind leading the blind.

I don't think the Democratic Party funds candidates during the primary.

---

While they couldn't technically bar a candidate, they could highly influence the candidate financially. They could refuse access to coordinated party funding for campaign expenditures. The whole thing is sad to the point of comical. They are worried about Fox News' integrity but are willing to run with a so called news organization like CNN, who by the way, got caught when Donna Brazile leaked debate questions to Clinton. It's all getting so rediculous and the party has become so open and brazen with their true intentions. The blind leading the blind.

I don't think the Democratic Party funds candidates during the primary.

The DNC? Sure it does. It offers financial support through the entire election cycle. Heck, wasn't there a huge WikiLeaks DNC email controversy when it came to Sanders and Clinton?

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/...016-215774

---

Beto is in.
Only two things could prevent Beto from winning the nomination and beating Trump in 2020.
1) live boy / dead girl type sex scandal
2) national tragedy on scale of 9/11

I don't say these things because I like Beto. I have no idea what Beto stands for, and no idea what kind of person he is. I neither like nor dislike him
I just get a really strong sense that he's the only winner in the whole group.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

I don't think the Democratic Party funds candidates during the primary.

The DNC? Sure it does. It offers financial support through the entire election cycle. Heck, wasn't there a huge WikiLeaks DNC email controversy when it came to Sanders and Clinton?

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/...016-215774

Can't take you seriously with that Avatar hahaha

---

Beto is in.
Only two things could prevent Beto from winning the nomination and beating Trump in 2020.
1) live boy / dead girl type sex scandal
2) national tragedy on scale of 9/11

I don't say these things because I like Beto. I have no idea what Beto stands for, and no idea what kind of person he is.  I neither like nor dislike him
I just get a really strong sense that he's the only winner in the whole group.

Yes, I am sure being on record for wanting to remove existing border barriers in Texas will go over real well in the heartland of America.

How is Beto a winner? He lost. Is it because he skateboards?

---

Beto is in.
Only two things could prevent Beto from winning the nomination and beating Trump in 2020.
1) live boy / dead girl type sex scandal
2) national tragedy on scale of 9/11

I don't say these things because I like Beto. I have no idea what Beto stands for, and no idea what kind of person he is.  I neither like nor dislike him
I just get a really strong sense that he's the only winner in the whole group.

Yes, I am sure being on record for wanting to remove existing border barriers in Texas will go over real well in the heartland of America.

How is Beto a winner? He lost. Is it because he skateboards?

Beto has won elections to the US house.  That his most recent effort was a loss actually helps him. He's not a senator or a rep now, so he doesn't have to have an opinion on everything McConnell or Pelosi do for the next 20 months.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Yes, I am sure being on record for wanting to remove existing border barriers in Texas will go over real well in the heartland of America.

How is Beto a winner? He lost. Is it because he skateboards?

Beto has won elections to the US house.  That his most recent effort was a loss actually helps him. He's not a senator or a rep now, so he doesn't have to have an opinion on everyone McConnell or Pelosi do for the next 20 months.

He will drop out mid-way through and run as Biden's VP.

---

Beto has won elections to the US house.  That his most recent effort was a loss actually helps him. He's not a senator or a rep now, so he doesn't have to have an opinion on everyone McConnell or Pelosi do for the next 20 months.

He will drop out mid-way through and run as Biden's VP.

That's possible.  But I don't think Biden will run.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

The DNC? Sure it does. It offers financial support through the entire election cycle. Heck, wasn't there a huge WikiLeaks DNC email controversy when it came to Sanders and Clinton?

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/...016-215774

Can't take you seriously with that Avatar hahaha

Thanks! As if I don't feel enough shame. LOL

---

Beto is in.
Only two things could prevent Beto from winning the nomination and beating Trump in 2020.
1) live boy / dead girl type sex scandal
2) national tragedy on scale of 9/11

I don't say these things because I like Beto. I have no idea what Beto stands for, and no idea what kind of person he is.  I neither like nor dislike him
I just get a really strong sense that he's the only winner in the whole group.

Yes, I am sure being on record for wanting to remove existing border barriers in Texas will go over real well in the heartland of America.

I caught that comment, too.   When I read what he said, I went, "Wow."  

It's amazing, these Democratic contenders seem to think the only way to get the nomination is to concede the general election.

---

Beto is in.
Only two things could prevent Beto from winning the nomination and beating Trump in 2020.
1) live boy / dead girl type sex scandal
2) national tragedy on scale of 9/11

I don't say these things because I like Beto. I have no idea what Beto stands for, and no idea what kind of person he is.  I neither like nor dislike him
I just get a really strong sense that he's the only winner in the whole group.

---

Beto will be found out under close scrutiny. Not so sure an Obama 2.0 would have the same effect in today's political climate

---

Every time I see Beto in action I’m reminded of a hyperactive juvenile Golden Retriever. Entertaining to watch but not very smart.

---

Robert O'Rourke is a 46-year-old child. He is aimless and uninteresting. He has a criminal history though the most serious crimes have been swept under the table (found with a condom full of white powder but a deputy sheriff destroyed the evidence).

---

Robert O'Rourke is a 46-year-old child.  He is aimless and uninteresting.  He has a criminal history though the most serious crimes have been swept under the table (found with a condom full of white powder but a deputy sheriff destroyed the evidence).

“…aimless and uninteresting.” 

Good description.

---