The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Parris Campbell
|
(03-28-2019, 05:57 PM)Jags02 Wrote:(03-28-2019, 05:39 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Look who he had throwing him the ball. Pff has him ranked the number 1 WR for this past season. Look at the production, he plays for a small school but had over 200 yrds 15 catches and 2 TDs against Georgia. Hes the next Edleman/Welker but much better than they were coming out. Of course Eldeman was a QB https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/co...rs-in-2018 We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-28-2019, 05:37 PM)Jags02 Wrote:(03-28-2019, 05:28 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: Maybe its lower down the list because we have less than what you listed trotting out at RG/RT/TE. We actually gave Cann a modest extension. It was far from huge. Even so, he sucks and we have zero depth at OG. Richardson may start at RT, but who knows. We still need a swing tackle in case of injury, because again, we have no depth at OT. I believe we will be fine at WR with Lee, Westbrook and a combo of Chark and Conley. Having a QB like Foles, automatically will make them better, but we desperately need to give Foles a safety net at the TE position. We currently have nothing there either.
(03-28-2019, 06:03 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote:(03-28-2019, 05:57 PM)Jags02 Wrote: I'm tempted to take this bet. There's no placing Isabella among the top 10 WRs this year, so I'm saying he at least makes it to the first pick in round three. Yeah I dont see him getting past NE in the 2nd (03-28-2019, 06:06 PM)knarnn Wrote:(03-28-2019, 05:39 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Look who he had throwing him the ball. That article is just saying water is wet (03-28-2019, 05:37 PM)Jags02 Wrote:(03-28-2019, 05:28 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: Maybe its lower down the list because we have less than what you listed trotting out at RG/RT/TE. Huge? He's the 33rd highest paid guard and his deal is set up to cut him after 2020. That is not huge. If he's outplayed by the loser of the RT battle (between Richardson and a rookie) then he'll become depth and Marrone won't bat an eyelash. I really hope they draft TE and tackle before considering a receiver. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-29-2019, 08:49 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:If we take Hockenson in the first, Taylor, Dillard, Ford, Lindstrom, and McGary are the only lineman in would take with our 2nd pick. Bradbury is really good as well but I see him as a center only and we would have to move Linder to RG. I would be good with than but I'm not sure the coaching staff would do it. It's a very good possibility all 5 of those offensive lineman will be off the board when we pick. If they are there are only 3 defenders I think will be in play if there. Adderley, Gardner, and Ferguson. It will come down to those 3 or a WR imo. I wouldnt reach on a lineman for need though if the value isnt there(03-28-2019, 05:37 PM)Jags02 Wrote: We just gave Cann a huge extension to remain our starting RG... (03-29-2019, 09:43 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:(03-29-2019, 08:49 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: Huge?If we take Hockenson in the first, Taylor, Dillard, Ford, Lindstrom, and McGary are the only lineman in would take with our 2nd pick. Bradbury is really good as well but I see him as a center only and we would have to move Linder to RG. I would be good with than but I'm not sure the coaching staff would do it. It's a very good possibility all 5 of those offensive lineman will be off the board when we pick. If they are there are only 3 defenders I think will be in play if there. Adderley, Gardner, and Ferguson. It will come down to those 3 or a WR imo. I wouldnt reach on a lineman for need though if the value isnt there That's all speculation based on TE in the first round, which may not happen. They may go OL in the 1st. TE in the second. I see the upside with Campbell. Wouldn't hate the pick. I'd just hope he doesn't turn out to be the next Stephen Hill - and I hope they find a way to max out TE and OL value early.
(03-29-2019, 09:43 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:(03-29-2019, 08:49 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: Huge?If we take Hockenson in the first, Taylor, Dillard, Ford, Lindstrom, and McGary are the only lineman in would take with our 2nd pick. Bradbury is really good as well but I see him as a center only and we would have to move Linder to RG. I would be good with than but I'm not sure the coaching staff would do it. It's a very good possibility all 5 of those offensive lineman will be off the board when we pick. If they are there are only 3 defenders I think will be in play if there. Adderley, Gardner, and Ferguson. It will come down to those 3 or a WR imo. I wouldnt reach on a lineman for need though if the value isnt there Taylor/Dillard/Ford will most likely be gone...decent chance Lindstrom/McGary still there...decent chance Risner/McCoy are there as well which I would be happy with.
(03-29-2019, 10:01 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:(03-29-2019, 09:43 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: If we take Hockenson in the first, Taylor, Dillard, Ford, Lindstrom, and McGary are the only lineman in would take with our 2nd pick. Bradbury is really good as well but I see him as a center only and we would have to move Linder to RG. I would be good with than but I'm not sure the coaching staff would do it. It's a very good possibility all 5 of those offensive lineman will be off the board when we pick. If they are there are only 3 defenders I think will be in play if there. Adderley, Gardner, and Ferguson. It will come down to those 3 or a WR imo. I wouldnt reach on a lineman for need though if the value isnt there If we did go WR in the 2nd I'd say there is a 95% chance it wouldnt be Campbell. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-29-2019, 10:40 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:That's mostly because he won't be available then.(03-29-2019, 10:01 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: That's all speculation based on TE in the first round, which may not happen. |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.