If Teddy and Clowney go 1 and 2 and Dave doesnt trade back, who do you like at 3?

---

Manziel or Sammy Watkins.

---

Bortles if Caldwell thinks he's worth it.

 

If not... then anybody but Matthews or a position that's not worth a 1st.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Manziel or Sammy Watkins.

I'll second this, and add Barr/Mack.

---

Watkins/Mack

 

Manziel on the fringes (I would be wringing my hands, praying for the kid though)

---

Mack, Bortles, or Carr.

---

Manziel.

---

THERE IS A SKELETON INSIDE OF YOU.

 

RIGHT NOW. THIS IS NOT A JOKE.

If Teddy and Clowney go 1 and 2 and Dave doesnt trade back, who do you like at 3?

If Teddy and Clowney are still there at three why want them?

 

Bridgewater is not an elite talent. As much as we all hoped he would show elite qualities with another year of college football, he did not. I think NFL teams refrain from taking average quarterbacks that high in the draft.

 

If I want the Jaguars to start throwing picks at a elite, franchise quarterback prospect, I don't want them to do it a year early. Teddy is not worth losing a lot of draft picks. Since we already know he is not elite talent why take him at all, let alone at a cost of two or three picks?

 

Before we glorify the Jaguars' offensive line as Teddy's sedan drivers, we need to balance the fact that they are awful. 50 sacks per year is abusive to any quarterback. Teddy is not built like a tank, ya know?

 

As for Clowney, he's a dangerous player until you throw a pot on him. Then he's neutralized, ineffectual, and invisible all at the same time. All the talk about him is too tall for a guy that produced just three sacks against normal pass protection.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

If Teddy and Clowney are still there at three why want them?

 

Bridgewater is not an elite talent. As much as we all hoped he would show elite qualities with another year of college football, he did not. I think NFL teams refrain from taking average quarterbacks that high in the draft.

 

If I want the Jaguars to start throwing picks at a elite, franchise quarterback prospect, I don't want them to do it a year early. Teddy is not worth losing a lot of draft picks. Since we already know he is not elite talent why take him at all, let alone at a cost of two or three picks?

 

Before we glorify the Jaguars' offensive line as Teddy's sedan drivers, we need to balance the fact that they are awful. 50 sacks per year is abusive to any quarterback. Teddy is not built like a tank, ya know?

 

As for Clowney, he's a dangerous player until you throw a pot on him. Then he's neutralized, ineffectual, and invisible all at the same time. All the talk about him is too tall for a guy that produced just three sacks against normal pass protection.

 

How long will you stay mired in your delusions?????

 

The only glaring flaws with Bridgewater is size and lack of a cannon arm.

 

Everything else is elite. It would behoove us to draft him if he is available

 

Clowney is a freak, if Bridgewater isn't available and Clowney is, would be difficult to pass over him.

---

Dee Ford if we can't trade back a few spots. I think when it's all said and done, Ford will be a top 10 pick so why not take him at 3..

---

Shock the world

http://nfldraftdiamonds.com/nfl-scout-te...one-worth/

 

Guys this a read...

 

If we don't Bridgewater we should go BPA

---

Manziel or Sammy Watkins.

Bingo......just what I was going to say

---

Bingo......just what I was going to say

Read the above article

 

If Bridgewater and Clowney are unavailable, we aren't getting Manziel

---

Read the above article

 

If Bridgewater and Clowney are unavailable, we aren't getting Manziel

I read the above article.....and many many more. YOU read the title of the thread......it says who do you want at 3.........not who will get get picked or not picked.......like you know anyway Nostradamus

---

I read the above article.....and many many more. YOU read the title of the thread......it says who do you want at 3.........not who will get get picked or not picked.......like you know anyway Nostradamus

Thats fair

---

Bortles, Watkins, or Mack. It's going to be very difficult for me to be disappointed in whatever Caldwell does. I love 5 players at the top.

---

Id be happy with Barr or Mack...screw it maybe even Watkins. Hasn't Barr been labeled the safest bet in the draft? Guys like him worry me after the Aaron Curry fiasco. Funny that that was the last "bust" it seems like Seattle has had

---

"Expect for the best. Prepare for the worst. Capitalize on what comes."

 

Right now Manziel or Bortles. Right now it doesn't really matter though. Last year at this time Geno Smith, Damontre Moore & Jarvis Jones were top 10 locks. Jones went the highest as a mid rd. 1, followed by Smith in rd. 2 then Moore in rd. 3. I'm a fan of Manziel, but then again I'm not doing the drafting.

---

Johnny Football regardless of who else is on the board.

---

Bortles/ Manziel/ Watkins/ Mack or trade back

---