Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Imagine Justin Blackmon, Cecil Shorts, Ace Sanders, and Sammy Watkins.

#1

Could you imagine this offense with those 4 players on the field at the same time? Not to mention you still have Denard Robinson to develop, and I think Jordan Todman is going to become a good back for us. 

 

 


Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

I would like to imagine Blackmon just being on the field not the re-hab center
Reply

#3

I think Murray could be a top 10 QB with that group and add in a Tre Mason, Seastruknk, Hyde, or Carrey


Reply

#4

I could play QB with those weapons


Reply

#5

I've been saying this for months now.....see my Watkins thread in the college sub-forum. Now that Dave is hinting at trading back......it's becoming more of a possibility. Hardly any of the mainstream media are talking about it........
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2014, 09:38 PM by flgatorsandjags.)

Quote:I've been saying this for months now.....see my Watkins thread in the college sub-forum. Now that Dave is hinting at trading back......it's becoming more of a possibility. Hardly any of the mainstream media are talking about it........
I don't see Watkins falling past the Raiders.  If we want him we cant trade back. 


Reply

#7

Quote:I don't see Watkins falling past the Raiders.  If we want him we cant trade back.


Yes true but they also want a QB badly......what if Bortles or Manziel is still there?
Reply

#8

Now imagine Chad Henne throwing the ball to them.  Same result.  Get the QB.


Reply

#9

Quote:Now imagine Chad Henne throwing the ball to them.  Same result.  Get the QB.
If we get Watkins we will still get a QB.  You think if we draft Watkins for some reason we wont draft a QB.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

I could see Watkins going #2 to the Rams, and the Rams using their other 1st round pick on an OT.
Reply

#11

Im imagining them with no competent QB... very unfortunate
Reply

#12

As long as we get a competent QB to throw the ball to them it would be killer. 


Reply

#13

Quote:Im imagining them with no competent QB... very unfortunate
 

Don't worry, we can just draft one of the ones throwing at the combine.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:Now imagine Chad Henne throwing the ball to them.  Same result.  Get the QB.


Putting a burner like Watkins out wide can take the top of a defense. Henne was throwing into very small windows because no one was afraid of our receivers. He will help open things up for Henne or whoever we pick up in the draft.
Reply

#15

Quote:I could see Watkins going #2 to the Rams, and the Rams using their other 1st round pick on an OT.


Unfortunately, a very distinct possibility if the Rams cannot find a trade-down partner.
Reply

#16

Yeah I have wanted either Manziel or Murray so if he had those weapons it could be lethal. Or get Clowney then Murray.
Titansequaltrash aka my mini me. Follows me around like a cute puppy dog.
Reply

#17

Quote:Now imagine Chad Henne throwing the ball to them. Same result. Get the QB.
This lol
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:If we get Watkins we will still get a QB.  You think if we draft Watkins for some reason we wont draft a QB.
 

I think that if we don't take one of the top QB's in the draft, we're going to have a guy who needs to sit for a time.  Which would mean Henne all over again, or worse Gabbert if Henne finds a better offer elsewhere.  We have drafted in the top of the first for too long.  Get the QB.

Reply

#19

Quote:I think that if we don't take one of the top QB's in the draft, we're going to have a guy who needs to sit for a time.  Which would mean Henne all over again, or worse Gabbert if Henne finds a better offer elsewhere.  We have drafted in the top of the first for too long.  Get the QB.
You can't force a pick just because you don't have a Quarterback.

Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

#20

The idea of Blackmon and Watkins on the same team sounds good.

 

But the idea of big play free agent DE and Jadaveon Clowney on the same line next to Sen'Derrick Marks and a rookie space eating big man sounds better. The Jags' D-Line would rival the Brett Favre-era Vikings.


THERE IS A SKELETON INSIDE OF YOU.

 

RIGHT NOW. THIS IS NOT A JOKE.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!