I would have told my unarmed daughter to obey police commands.

---

One of the reason I hate double standards so much is that it lends itself to this level of discourse.

 I agree wholeheartedly, double standards are are real problem when it comes to occupying the Capitol building.

I mean this is just a joke to you, right? You're not sincerely saying the picture you posted should be treated equally to Jan 6, are you?
If yes, ha ha, good one.
If no, wow, talk about asinine.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

 I agree wholeheartedly, double standards are are real problem when it comes to occupying the Capitol building.

Those folks all went through the metal detector.

OK.  If everyone who entered the Capitol on Jan 6th had been naked (clearly not carrying weapons), would it still have been an "insurrection"?

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

Those folks all went through the metal detector.

OK.  If everyone who entered the Capitol on Jan 6th had been naked (clearly not carrying weapons), would it still have been an "insurrection"?

Maybe.  Do they fight the cops in your scenario? Is an important, constitutionally mandated procedure taking place in the building at that moment?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

The officer was supposed to just let her in I guess.

Yup, just like the officers that opened and held the doors as they let them thru into the building in the first place. The man is an unmitigated coward.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

The officer was supposed to just let her in I guess.

Yup, just like the officers that opened and held the doors as they let them thru into the building in the first place. The man is an unmitigated coward.

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

---

If the cops sell you drugs and then turn around and arrest you for possesion that is illegal entrapment. If one cop opens the door for you and allows entry into the building and then a cop inside kills you for being in there then that is murder IMO.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

I get that argument, but this dude was in a completely different part of the building. It was one guy and a mob was coming at him. Did you watch the video?

---

Yup, just like the officers that opened and held the doors as they let them thru into the building in the first place. The man is an unmitigated coward.

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

Yes, but the left established that standard. I am making an appeal for those on the right to not use that standard, but let's not forget who started it. Rules for thee, but not for me. It's got to go.

---

Yup, just like the officers that opened and held the doors as they let them thru into the building in the first place. The man is an unmitigated coward.

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

Bro, that coward shot her as she was crawling through a doorway. Scary stuff right there. Cowardly piece of garbage needs to be held to the same standards as the guy who took down a struggling guy that KICKED his way out of a patrol car. Cause if my 6'2" 230lb [BLEEP] did that they would have just beaten me to death in Jville.

And ya know what? You should absolve Kyle Rittenhouse then. Seriously. Cause he actually was being attacked unlike this coward who left his loaded Glock 22 in the men's room... like a piece of garbage. He sucks. He deserves to lose his job. And his freedom. And the ONLY reason he isn't being held accountable? He's black. Period. He was a huge guy and she was a tiny woman... yet you lefties are all like OH NO!!! That tiny white cop shot that huge black guy.. HE'S A RACIST!!!

---

I get that argument, but this dude was in a completely different part of the building. It was one guy and a mob was coming at him. Did you watch the video?

---

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

Yes, but the left established that standard. I am making an appeal for those on the right to not use that standard, but let's not forget who started it. Rules for thee, but not for me. It's got to go.

No argument from me on that.  The same standard should apply to everyone.   Unfortunately, there is massive hypocrisy on both sides of the political spectrum.

---

Unfortunately, there are people who specialize in manipulating emotions.

It's interesting to watch the evolution of thought. When Babbitt was shot, most conservatives thought it was unfortunate, but recognized she was in the wrong. Then the talking heads got involved. They pointed out the double standard from the left. Then they started using Babbitt's death to mock the left, then people started repeating it, and, before long, convinced themselves this was an unjust shooting.

Could it have been avoided by the officer? Probably. Could it have been avoided by Babbitt? Absolutely.

---

Unfortunately, there are people who specialize in manipulating emotions.

It's interesting to watch the evolution of thought. When Babbitt was shot, most conservatives thought it was unfortunate, but recognized she was in the wrong. Then the talking heads got involved. They pointed out the double standard from the left. Then they started using Babbitt's death to mock the left, then people started repeating it, and, before long, convinced themselves this was an unjust shooting.

Could it have been avoided by the officer? Probably. Could it have been avoided by Babbitt? Absolutely.

Imagine the outrage in this country if a 6'3" 260lb white man (fat-[BLEEP]) decided to shoot a tiny little black woman because she was crawling through a doorway.

Just. Imagine.

SAY HER NAME!!! SAY IT!!! SAY HER NAAAAAAAAAAME!!!!

---

Unfortunately, there are people who specialize in manipulating emotions.

It's interesting to watch the evolution of thought. When Babbitt was shot, most conservatives thought it was unfortunate, but recognized she was in the wrong. Then the talking heads got involved. They pointed out the double standard from the left. Then they started using Babbitt's death to mock the left, then people started repeating it, and, before long, convinced themselves this was an unjust shooting.

Could it have been avoided by the officer? Probably. Could it have been avoided by Babbitt? Absolutely.

Imagine the outrage in this country if a 6'3" 260lb white man (fat-[BLEEP]) decided to shoot a tiny little black woman because she was crawling through a doorway.

Just. Imagine.

SAY HER NAME!!! SAY IT!!! SAY HER NAAAAAAAAAAME!!!!

I can't +1 this enough

---

Meet Ashley Babbitt --- seems like a nice girl

https://www.latimes.com/california/waagzwg9gso-123

---

Meet Ashley Babbitt --- seems like a nice girl

https://www.latimes.com/california/waagzwg9gso-123

And if you don't agree with her, you're part of the problem..

Everything she spoke of was truth..

---

Meet Ashley Babbitt --- seems like a nice girl

https://www.latimes.com/california/waagzwg9gso-123

And if you don't agree with her, you're part of the problem..

Everything she spoke of was truth..

Hurricane is a devout believer in anything people with a (D) behind their names say.

Don't get me wrong, I have a problem with people that devoutly follow people with an ® behind their name too.

You have to sift through the BS... if you're not intellectually capable of doing that... you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

The whole land owners only could vote thing is crap... I think it should be an IQ test.... if you score over 100... go ahead and vote...

---

And if you don't agree with her, you're part of the problem..

Everything she spoke of was truth..

Hurricane is a devout believer in anything people with a (D) behind their names say.

Don't get me wrong, I have a problem with people that devoutly follow people with an ® behind their name too.

You have to sift through the BS... if you're not intellectually capable of doing that... you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

The whole land owners only could vote thing is crap... I think it should be an IQ test.... if you score over 100... go ahead and vote...

Yeah I've learned to normally skip over his garbage.. once in a while his stupidity catches my eye.

---

Yup, just like the officers that opened and held the doors as they let them thru into the building in the first place. The man is an unmitigated coward.

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

Imagine if only the races were reversed and every other aspect remained the same.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

Imagine if only the races were reversed and every other aspect remained the same.

Yes.  The people who are calling the police officer a murderer would be calling him a hero.

---

Yup, just like the officers that opened and held the doors as they let them thru into the building in the first place. The man is an unmitigated coward.

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

You're consumed by the foaming at the mouth rhetoric spewing from the left.  How is it even possible to "overthrow" an election?  Government and the function thereof is not dependent upon a specific physical location.  Occupying the Capitol could never have done more than delay the event for a few hours.   They could have burned the place to the ground and the process simply would have continued at another location.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

No.  He did what he should have done.  There was a mob that had invaded the Capitol, and was smashing their way through various barricades, openly trying to interrupt a Constitutionally mandated process, trying to smash their way into the Congressional chamber, disobeying police commands to stop, and in my opinion, I wish they had shot more of them.  

She was a wacko Q-anon conspiracy theorist who thought she could help enable the overthrow of an election.  He was a police officer sworn to uphold the law and defend the Capitol building.  She tried to force her way in, and so he shot her.  

How many times have people on this forum said, you need to obey the police and you won't get shot?  And the very same people call him a murderer.

You're consumed by the foaming at the mouth rhetoric spewing from the left.  How is it even possible to "overthrow" an election?  Government and the function thereof is not dependent upon a specific physical location.  Occupying the Capitol could never have done more than delay the event for a few hours.   They could have burned the place to the ground and the process simply would have continued at another location.

The process could only take place with a quorum of the 535 people needed all meeting physically in the same place.  If they managed to capture or kill members of Congress there could have been a very different outcome with no clear constitutional remedy. It wouldn't have taken many.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.