The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Jags FA talk and Signings
|
(03-14-2022, 02:48 PM)Newton Wrote:(03-14-2022, 02:47 PM)burt1jason Wrote: I have the feeling somebody may want to jump up to steal Hutchinson from Detroit. So we may be able to trade down and get a top outside receiver and an extra pick. Or, trade #1 for somewhere else in top 10 (take Karlaftis or Jordan Davis), plus another first rounder this year or next, plus another 2nd or 3rd rounder.
"I am only an average man, but by George, I work harder at it than the average man." - Teddy Roosevelt
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-14-2022, 03:03 PM)Khan Artist Wrote:(03-14-2022, 02:51 PM)Upper Wrote: Trade up a dozen spots and take whichever of the big 4 falls to the early 20s. As long as everyone we draft is not worth re-signing then sure.
(03-14-2022, 03:07 PM)Upper Wrote:(03-14-2022, 03:03 PM)Khan Artist Wrote: Hey, it's not our money. Who cares. Let them go ham. Again, this isn't really a problem for us. We don't know what the deals look like yet. I doubt (hopefully) that Baalke is entirely inept and understands we need room to extend players later. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
4 for 84? No shot that's correct.
We didn't want to take on amaris contract but we would pay that to kirk? That doesn't make sense. (03-14-2022, 03:17 PM)jessepeck1213 Wrote: 4 for 84? No shot that's correct. It was amended to "up to", but still, we paid holy crap money to 4 non premium positions. We're better, but not as much better as we should be for that amount of cash thrown around.
(03-14-2022, 03:17 PM)jessepeck1213 Wrote: 4 for 84? No shot that's correct. Kirk is ascending; Amari is stagnating. He didn't set the world on fire with a top 10 QB. Kirk is also the better deep threat. We already have a good route runner/posession guy in Jones. We needed a deep threat.
"I am only an average man, but by George, I work harder at it than the average man." - Teddy Roosevelt
The focus should be on the guarantees. The entire contract is not fully guaranteed so I don't get why some of the pundits are acting crazy like it's 4yrs 84 mil fully guaranteed lol
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-14-2022, 03:18 PM)Upper Wrote:(03-14-2022, 03:17 PM)jessepeck1213 Wrote: 4 for 84? No shot that's correct. I thought I heard on 1010xl that it was 4 years, 17M per year. Could be wrong on that. ![]()
Lmao, it took literally three days for people to say 12M a year for Kirk was crazy in the other FA thread to rationalizing 18M with escalators to 21M.
Fandom is a hell of a drug.
The only thing that matters is the guaranteed money. The rest is irrelevant.
Not sure why people are freaking out, we just got ALOT better (03-14-2022, 03:21 PM)Sibelius Wrote:(03-14-2022, 03:18 PM)Upper Wrote: It was amended to "up to", but still, we paid holy crap money to 4 non premium positions. We're better, but not as much better as we should be for that amount of cash thrown around. 4/72 (18M AAV) with escalators up to 4/84. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I mean if they were willing to give Kirk up to $84 million, what exactly did Chark want that they decided to let him test FA?
(03-14-2022, 03:22 PM)Upper Wrote:(03-14-2022, 03:21 PM)Sibelius Wrote: I thought I heard on 1010xl that it was 4 years, 17M per year. Could be wrong on that. Either I misheard or Frangie's math sux. LOL Last year we complained that they went with value pix that were not be players. At least they're paying to get good players in here. ![]() (03-14-2022, 03:24 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: I mean if they were willing to give Kirk up to $84 million, what exactly did Chark want that they decided to let him test FA? Chark might get $20 per with the bidding war created by lack of supply
Championship Formula:
1) Draft Trevor Lawrence! 2) Play good physical Defense! 3) Keep 91% of the roster healthy! 4) ??? 5) Blank #2 6) CHAMPIONSHIP!!!
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Wow, I knew that Kirk has never had a 1k yard season, but I didn't know that Pederson has never coached a 1k yard receiver either. Something massive is going to have to change for Kirk to earn his money.
No matter what this team does some posters will find a way to moan and whine
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.