The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Manziel, Clowney, Bridgewater or Bortles?
|
Quote:Teddy looks so much more polished than Johnny FootballUnless you have a noodle for an arm or get unlucky and injured, polished usually means you will be a top flight NFL qb We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I've never heard anyone say anything that wasn't qualified with "compared to the rest." Meaning, it's very possible the reports have always been true that none of these QBs carry better than a second round grade. So, "polish" is quite a relative term. It doesn't mean any of them are truly ready day one. It doesn't mean that at all.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Quote:I've never heard anyone say anything that wasn't qualified with "compared to the rest." Meaning, it's very possible the reports have always been true that none of these QBs carry better than a second round grade. So, "polish" is quite a relative term. It doesn't mean any of them are truly ready day one. It doesn't mean that at all.Very few qbs have come into the league who were regarded as "polished", Last one was Luck, the ones before were Ryan, Manning Seeing its use in the past I have regarded "polished" as NFL ready. The only report the said that NONE of these QB's were ready was the one coming from the Bengals scout I have seen several reports (not many) which said Bridgewater was the only 1st rounder of the qb class but he was a mid to late pick
I don't think that we'll be picking Teddy if he's there and I'm perfectly ok with that. I'd be sad if we picked em and I want Manziel.
Mayock: I went back and watched some more Bridgewater tape and I am less impressed with him right now.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Borrowed from another thread...
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/19761...%20Manziel Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
Quote:Mayock: I went back and watched some more Bridgewater tape and I am less impressed with him right now. Did he elaborate?
this poll is invalid as there is no Tebow option. :whistling:
<!-- isHtml:1 --><!-- isHtml:1 -->;
; Quote:If they're all on the board, I take Clowney and try to target Carr in round 2 or Garroppolo/Murray/Mettenberger in round 3.^ This We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
If we don't take one in first round I do hope they go after McCarron
<!-- isHtml:1 --><!-- isHtml:1 -->;
;
I picked Clowney and I wouldn't draft any of the 3 quarterbacks with a ten foot pole.
I think Clowney is the best prospect in this draft class. He is a perfect scheme fit for the Leo position. His major weakness is the lack of elite strength for a defensive end which is less of an issue lining up wide of the OT. Learning under Clemmons is an ideal situation and will show him the effort needed to be a professional.
Respect the game. Play with a sense of urgency.
1.) Take care of the ball. Win the turnover battle. 2.) It's all about 3rd down. Win on 3rd down to win the game. 3.) Playmakers make plays. The only reason that you put your uniform on is to make plays. In order to EARN your paycheck, you must make plays. Learn from the great collapse of 2023.
How many people would be highly upset or incredibly happy if Dave drafts Teddy Bridgewater at #3?
I am still going with Clowney, as I did many months ago. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Why are you bumping old threads to tell us this? There aren't enough threads already here to make these declarations?
I don't think anyone would be "upset" if Bridgewater is the pick. I do think they'd see it as a bit of a reach. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.