Lets say TB gave us a king's ransom for Clowney here because they get in a bidding war with another team.  They give us their 1st round pick, their 2nd round pick, and a 2nd round pick next year.  Our front office decides that there is no QB that is worth it at that pick

 

Houston - Bortles

STL - Watkins

TB (via Jax) - Clowney

CLE - Robinson

OAK - Mack

ATL - Matthews

JAX (via TB) - ?


In this scenario, since we do not believe there is a QB that was worth it at 3, we would be very unlikely to take one here.  With that in mind, what non-QB would be the best pick here?

 

Two people that I would think would be a possibility is Eric Ebron or Justin Gilbert.  Both fill a need and would make a definite impact on our team.  It seems kind of an awkward spot.  What are your thoughts?

---

I think it would be Mike Evans in that crazy scenario. 

---

Teddy.

---

I would take Darqueze Dennard or Gilbert there.

---

With the 7th overall selection I'd take Mike Evans at WR to help out Henne for the time being. We lack a big, overbearing presence at WR on this team, and Evans fits that perfectly. He's a big guy, pretty quick, good hands, good leaping ability. He'll win some contests for you.

With an extra 2ND round pick to play with, we could do so much with that. We could package those up and probably jump up to get a QB at the bottom of RD1, or sit tight and get the QB in RD2, take another LB/DE somewhere.

I really like this scenario, it's hard to think straight, LOL. You would basically give us 12 picks in this year's draft, plus an extra pick for next year. Too much thinking man!

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

I wouldnt mind Gilbert but i wonder about Barr still, Id feel okay with taking him out of the top 5. Either way i love the picks but at the same time i hate that we missed out on watkins,clowney,mack

---

:thanks: Extra Life 2016 is 11/05/16 :thanks:

I would love a trade down but why would a team try and trade with us if they know wenwouldnwwnt Clowney? Wouldn't they try and jump us?

---

I would love a trade down but why would a team try and trade with us if they know wenwouldnwwnt Clowney? Wouldn't they try and jump us?

Well since mocks are all in fantasy anyway, lets assume we reached out to them and told them we would be willing to trade before they contacted STL.

---

Bridgewater easily

---

Shock the world

If we're working on the assumption that they don't want Bridgewater, I'd take Gilbert.

---

Just to be different, Bortles.

Ebron

---

I'd lean towards Anthony Barr but Aaron Donald would garner heavy consideration.

---

I'd lean towards Anthony Barr but Aaron Donald would garner heavy consideration.

LOL. Not at 7.

 

Bridgewater has to be the pick if he's there at 7.

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

LOL. Not at 7.

 

Bridgewater has to be the pick if he's there at 7.

 

If you like Bridgewater, you don't trade out of #3 to select him at #7.

 

That's something to LOL at.

---

in before JC's Lewan

 

seriously though, it would be Bridgewater for me and I wouldn't even risk trading down

---

If you like Bridgewater, you don't trade out of #3 to select him at #7.

 

That's something to LOL at.

Exactly.  I mentioned that in the OP as well.  If they are big on Bridgewater, they take unplug their phone, run to the podium, and take him at 3.

---

Well this is one weird scenario 

But if it goes down like this you take Barr no doubt his draft stock has been plummeting but i would take that chance

Also Gilbert is a really interesting pick here too. 

---

If you like Bridgewater, you don't trade out of #3 to select him at #7.

 

That's something to LOL at.

There is better players at 3 than Bridgewater, dippy.

 

It's called value.

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

There is better players at 3 than Bridgewater, dippy.

 

It's called value.

 

If you think your QB is even top 10 worthy, and you have the 3rd pick, and you have a huge need at QB, that IS value.

If you deem him the QB of your future, he is worthy of the 3rd pick and presents good value.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

There is better players at 3 than Bridgewater, dippy.

 

It's called value.

 

Don't insult me, Tommy.

 

Especially when you have flawed logic to begin with.

---