Create Account

Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums The Gridiron The College Game Mack may be as good as clowney.


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mack may be as good as clowney.

  • Offline Jinjo
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,238
    Threads: 24
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Reputation: 0
#101
03-28-2014, 09:42 PM

Clowney is still better though. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline knarnn
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 19,654
    Threads: 692
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 132
#102
03-28-2014, 09:47 PM

Quote:Clowney is still better though.


I think most everyone agrees with this viewpoint.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

  • Offline Teal Time Radio
    Jaguars MB Icon

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,852
    Threads: 123
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Reputation: -25
#103
03-28-2014, 09:48 PM (This post was last modified: 03-28-2014, 09:50 PM by Teal Time Radio.)

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=9619223

 

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=9619375

Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags
Reply

  • Offline Psyrus
    Prospect

  • *
  • Posts: 2
    Threads: 0
    Joined: Mar 2006
    Reputation: 0
#104
03-28-2014, 09:55 PM

Quote:Clowney is still better though. 
Exactly my point.  Mack would be a good pick at 10-15 in this draft, but with the #3 pick there will be options available that will be able to effect the game far more than he will.
Reply

  • Offline KYjaggy
    Quarantined - I'm infected. Stay away.

  • Posts: 6,182
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Reputation: 2
#105
03-28-2014, 09:56 PM

Quote:Clowney is still better though. 
Clowney should and hopefully will be better. Right now though, Mack is a better and much more complete player. 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline Markulous
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,841
    Threads: 9
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Reputation: 4
#106
03-28-2014, 10:22 PM

Quote:Exactly my point.  Mack would be a good pick at 10-15 in this draft, but with the #3 pick there will be options available that will be able to effect the game far more than he will.
I don't agree.  He's a better prospect than Dion Jordan was last year, and is easily worth a top 3 pick in this draft and last year's draft both.  I like Clowney better, but either guy should be a stud.
Reply

  • Offline Jinjo
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,238
    Threads: 24
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Reputation: 0
#107
03-28-2014, 11:30 PM

Quote:Clowney should and hopefully will be better. Right now though, Mack is a better and much more complete player. 
 

Disagree. Right now i think Clowney would be a better DE in the NFL than Mack a LB. I think both will be great players. But I see Clowney better at his position right now more than Mack is at his. Dont forget how dominant he is against the run too. 
Reply

  • Offline trunt87
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,369
    Threads: 14
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 8
#108
03-29-2014, 09:14 AM

I don't see it from Mack. LT? Ha. The Ohio State game wasn't even that impressive. Still waiting to see this relentless motor.


Dee Ford is better.
Reply

  • Offline Bullseye
    Guy who posts a lot

  • *******
  • Posts: 16,905
    Threads: 1,188
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Reputation: 421
#109
03-29-2014, 10:50 AM

Quote:I don't see it from Mack. LT? Ha. The Ohio State game wasn't even that impressive. Still waiting to see this relentless motor.

Dee Ford is better.


I see Clowney as better than Mack, but I disagree with you on the Ohio state game. Mack had 2-3 sacks that game plus an INT return for a TD.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline trunt87
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,369
    Threads: 14
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 8
#110
03-29-2014, 10:55 AM

Quote:I see Clowney as better than Mack, but I disagree with you on the Ohio state game. Mack had 2-3 sacks that game plus an INT return for a TD.


He had a good game. I am just not that impressed with him. I see some loafing from him too.
Reply

  • Offline pirkster
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 11,177
    Threads: 118
    Joined: May 2006
    Reputation: 74
#111
03-29-2014, 01:12 PM

Quote:He had a good game. I am just not that impressed with him. I see some loafing from him too.
 

Do you realize that merely one sack per game puts you in elite territory?  Anyone can look bad if that's all you're looking for.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

  • Offline Doc Holliday904
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,938
    Threads: 15
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Reputation: 5
#112
03-29-2014, 01:51 PM

Quote:lol @ the recent Mack hype....


guy might wind up an out & out bust. Small school inferior competition. Could be another Larry Hart. Built just like him.


Yea that's the only thing that worries me. Hope he can stay dominant against better competition

Reply

  • Offline Tommy
    Journeyman

  • ****
  • Posts: 1,591
    Threads: 34
    Joined: Mar 2012
    Reputation: 0
#113
03-29-2014, 02:05 PM

Quote:You didnt know that?
No they're not, lol.
Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline Tommy
    Journeyman

  • ****
  • Posts: 1,591
    Threads: 34
    Joined: Mar 2012
    Reputation: 0
#114
03-29-2014, 02:06 PM

Quote:I don't see it from Mack. LT? Ha. The Ohio State game wasn't even that impressive. Still waiting to see this relentless motor.


Dee Ford is better.
LOL.
Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

  • Offline trunt87
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,369
    Threads: 14
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 8
#115
03-29-2014, 04:00 PM (This post was last modified: 03-29-2014, 04:02 PM by trunt87.)

Quote:Do you realize that merely one sack per game puts you in elite territory? Anyone can look bad if that's all you're looking for.

You're extremely misguided if you think all I'm looking for are sacks.
Reply

  • Offline trunt87
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,369
    Threads: 14
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 8
#116
03-29-2014, 04:01 PM

Quote:LOL.


Quality post right here folks.
Reply

  • Offline jaxjags625
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,923
    Threads: 51
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Reputation: 0
#117
03-29-2014, 04:19 PM

Quote:Quality post right here folks.


Right? Just an LOL.... I'm not very impressed with Mack either. I don't think he's worth the #3 pick. He has talent, but a lot of his film is just meh.. He's not Larry Hart, but he's also not Von Miller. I say we take Johnny, Bridgewater, or Clowney and either Shazier or Marcus Smith second round.
Shock the world
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline JagsFerLife
    Rookie

  • ***
  • Posts: 372
    Threads: 6
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Reputation: 0
#118
03-29-2014, 04:47 PM

Quote:lol @ the recent Mack hype....

 

guy might wind up an out & out bust. Small school inferior competition. Could be another Larry Hart. Built just like him. 
 

Oh?

[Image: larry_hart_2011_07_28.jpg]

 

[Image: 021b.jpg]
Reply

  • Offline knarnn
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 19,654
    Threads: 692
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 132
#119
03-29-2014, 04:53 PM (This post was last modified: 03-29-2014, 04:55 PM by knarnn.)

Quote:Oh?

[Image: khalil-mack-OOO_7938.jpg]


He's definitely not built like Tubby Hart.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

  • Offline HIGH SCORE
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,530
    Threads: 67
    Joined: Mar 2007
    Reputation: 1
#120
03-29-2014, 04:54 PM

Quote:Quality post right here folks.


Pretty much all you get from Thomas.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Forum software by © MyBB - Theme © iAndrew 2017

ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!