“Facepalm”. 

Your every response again exposes you and you with all of your self proclaimed intellectual superiority still cannot resolve the disparity.

What did I say that isn't true?

Everything.  You have not moved beyond the initial narrative.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Walker a sack and a qb hit that drive

---

What did I say that isn't true?

Everything.  You have not moved beyond the initial narrative.

Start at post 1,012.
Take away the statements about you and other posters on the board. 
There are six claims of fact about the events that day. There are two or three opinions and interpretations of those events. Go ahead and ignore the opinions and the interpretations. 

Which of the six fact claims is false?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Is this even a fair fight at this point?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/...FzZeg&s=19

---

Is this even a fair fight at this point?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/...FzZeg&s=19

The epicness of this will last forever..

---

Everything.  You have not moved beyond the initial narrative.

Start at post 1,012.
Take away the statements about you and other posters on the board. 
There are six claims of fact about the events that day. There are two or three opinions and interpretations of those events. Go ahead and ignore the opinions and the interpretations. 

Which of the six fact claims is false?

The entire post is wrong and predisposition to your predetermined conclusion.

You continue to project your conclusions onto the mindset of the individuals there.  How arrogant and narcissistic of you. 

Do you not see how you are responding?  Trump told them to do it and they are so dumb they did it until he said stop.  You are a typical democrat that does not believe in individuality.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Start at post 1,012.
Take away the statements about you and other posters on the board. 
There are six claims of fact about the events that day. There are two or three opinions and interpretations of those events. Go ahead and ignore the opinions and the interpretations. 

Which of the six fact claims is false?

The entire post is wrong and predisposition to your predetermined conclusion.

You continue to project your conclusions onto the mindset of the individuals there.  How arrogant and narcissistic of you. 

Do you not see how you are responding?  Trump told them to do it and they are so dumb they did it until he said stop.  You are a typical democrat that does not believe in individuality.

Where did I say they're dumb?
Did about 2500 "protestors" enter the Capitol on a day when it was entirely closed to the public?
Was there a constitutionally mandated procedure involving every member of Congress going on that day?
Did Trump tell them to go to the Capitol around 1 pm?
Did Trump wait three hours before telling them to leave for the first time around 4 pm?

Help me understand which of these four facts I got wrong.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

So, DNC had to lie about a fake special guest to get people to tune in?

When it comes to special guest appearances at NC's, the RNC can't genuinely laugh when a keynote special guest was Thunderlips.

---

CCL Stroudcrowd1

So, DNC had to lie about a fake special guest to get people to tune in?

When it comes to special guest appearances at NC's, the RNC can't genuinely laugh when a keynote special guest was Thunderlips.

Kakala couldn't get anyone to show up.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

The entire post is wrong and predisposition to your predetermined conclusion.

You continue to project your conclusions onto the mindset of the individuals there.  How arrogant and narcissistic of you. 

Do you not see how you are responding?  Trump told them to do it and they are so dumb they did it until he said stop.  You are a typical democrat that does not believe in individuality.

Where did I say they're dumb?
Did about 2500 "protestors" enter the Capitol on a day when it was entirely closed to the public?
Was there a constitutionally mandated procedure involving every member of Congress going on that day?
Did Trump tell them to go to the Capitol around 1 pm?
Did Trump wait three hours before telling them to leave for the first time around 4 pm?

Help me understand which of these four facts I got wrong.

You infer it every time you state “Trump told them to go home and they did”

Those are your facts.  Facts you have adopted without context because they fit your premise and narrative.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Where did I say they're dumb?
Did about 2500 "protestors" enter the Capitol on a day when it was entirely closed to the public?
Was there a constitutionally mandated procedure involving every member of Congress going on that day?
Did Trump tell them to go to the Capitol around 1 pm?
Did Trump wait three hours before telling them to leave for the first time around 4 pm?

Help me understand which of these four facts I got wrong.

You infer it every time you state “Trump told them to go home and they did”

Those are your facts.  Facts you have adopted without context because they fit your premise and narrative.

He told them to go home around 4pm.
Most of them were off premises by 5 pm.
He told them to go home and they did.  Two facts.  Which do you dispute?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You infer it every time you state “Trump told them to go home and they did”

Those are your facts.  Facts you have adopted without context because they fit your premise and narrative.

He told them to go home around 4pm.
Most of them were off premises by 5 pm.
He told them to go home and they did.  Two facts.  Which do you dispute?

Most of them were headed home long before Trump came out and told them this has gone too far.  I dispute your version of the events.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

You infer it every time you state “Trump told them to go home and they did”

Those are your facts.  Facts you have adopted without context because they fit your premise and narrative.

He told them to go home around 4pm.
Most of them were off premises by 5 pm.
He told them to go home and they did.  Two facts.  Which do you dispute?

What did he do, call them all, maybe sent them a text or a quick email telling them to hit the road ? Maybe while in the midst of the violent insurrection they all just happened to stop in front of a TV to hear Trump tell them to split. Maybe the crypt keeper pelosi came out and told them Don said they needed to leave now. Buwaahahahaaa

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

Is this even a fair fight at this point?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/...FzZeg&s=19

The Foo Fighters are going to have a conniption.

---

I don’t think so. The mainstream media now realizes that with the convention over, Harris can no longer survive on canned statements. She has to speak off-the-cuff and hold press conferences if she hopes to be a serious candidate. They know she is incapable of doing so. Unfortunately, seething hate for Donald Trump doesn’t make her smart.

You have to ask yourself, when is the last time the mainstream media made the effort to fact check a Democrat presidential candidate. Or for that matter, even questioned that candidate’s record. They may have done cursory drive-bys, but not to the level they are with Heels Up.

That's why I am concerned.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

I've said previously that I think the powers that be on the left, the ones behind the scenes that aren't on board with Kamala being the nominee, are using their surrogates in the media to sabotage her so that the nomination in '28 is up for grabs which will not be going up against a sitting President since Trump will be leaving office.

That's a huge risk. Giving him essentially 4 years to build up a strong, viable successor as well for 28'.

Would be easier to lie through your teeth for her and perform damage control for the next 4 years instead.

I am telling you. Something seems off here.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I think you’re brushing it aside too quickly.  It’s widely considered any easier task to run when there’s no incumbent.  I’ve grown to like JD, but I don’t think the Dems at this juncture view him as a strong opponent in ‘28.  

I don’t believe that those that have aspirations, like Gavin from the Pelosi family/machine, really want to see Kamala win and potentially wait 8 years or longer if it swings back to Republicans after a hypothetical Harris regime.  Neither should the Obama’s really want to see her win if Big Mike has any political aspirations.  Could easily see either Gavin or Obama instructing their surrogates in the media to sabotage.  

It is odd though whatever the reason behind it. And no I don’t trust it on its face as “honest journalism” given the [BLEEP] the legacy media has tried sell in recent years.

---

That's why I am concerned.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

That's a huge risk. Giving him essentially 4 years to build up a strong, viable successor as well for 28'.

Would be easier to lie through your teeth for her and perform damage control for the next 4 years instead.

I am telling you. Something seems off here.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I think you’re brushing it aside too quickly.  It’s widely considered any easier task to run when there’s no incumbent.  I’ve grown to like JD, but I don’t think the Dems at this juncture view him as a strong opponent in ‘28.  

I don’t believe that those that have aspirations, like Gavin from the Pelosi family/machine, really want to see Kamala win and potentially wait 8 years or longer if it swings back to Republicans after a hypothetical Harris regime.  Neither should the Obama’s really want to see her win if Big Mike has any political aspirations.  Could easily see either Gavin or Obama instructing their surrogates in the media to sabotage.  

It is odd though whatever the reason behind it. And no I don’t trust it on its face as “honest journalism” given the [BLEEP] the legacy media has tried sell in recent years.

Yeah I can see them waiting for 2028. No one wanted to be the VP, there is no way that's the pick after vetting if there were other options. They survived 4 years of Trump and think they can do it again. The MSM will provide cover again.

Either Trump will win and crush the uniparty never to return or their plans are just delayed 4 years.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---

Im currently in Paris. Media here is 100% pro Harris. Which isnt suprizing, i guess.

---

"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."  - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption

When it comes to special guest appearances at NC's, the RNC can't genuinely laugh when a keynote special guest was Thunderlips.

Kakala couldn't get anyone to show up.

Even that is better than what the RNC dredged up.

---

Is this even a fair fight at this point?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/...FzZeg&s=19

More 60+ year old white guys isn't going to win this election.

I'd rather see Nikki Haley as the R nominee.

---

CCL Stroudcrowd1

Im currently in Paris. Media here is 100% pro Harris. Which isnt suprizing, i guess.

Not surprising. You’re in the belly of the beast.

---

Kakala couldn't get anyone to show up.

Even that is better than what the RNC dredged up.

---

Is this even a fair fight at this point?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/...FzZeg&s=19

More 60+ year old white guys isn't going to win this election.

I'd rather see Nikki Haley as the R nominee.

Well, that's certainly an opintion.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato