Sounds to me like the problem is cisgender men and not transgender people. Aim your laws at the actual danger.

No, the problem is men who want to do bad things to women. Wearing a dress doesn’t make you a woman any more than getting a tan makes you a Mexican. You are what you are. Follow the science.

Are you saying that all transgender females are sex abusers/rapists?

---

No, the problem is men who want to do bad things to women. Wearing a dress doesn’t make you a woman any more than getting a tan makes you a Mexican. You are what you are. Follow the science.

Are you saying that all transgender females are sex abusers/rapists?

Not even remotely. But I’m not saying they are all harmless little kittens either. All men aren’t abusers or rapists either, but none of them need to be in woman’s spaces either.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

Are you saying that all transgender females are sex abusers/rapists?

Not even remotely. But I’m not saying they are all harmless little kittens either. All men aren’t abusers or rapists either, but none of them need to be in woman’s spaces either.

Your trying too accuse everyone of the actions of a few because you have already decided that they are guilty because you don't understand the core idea of gender identity.

We should address mass shootings in the same manner. If you own a gun then you are a potential mass shooter so we must arrest, limit your rights and jail you, even if you have not committed that crime.

---

Not even remotely. But I’m not saying they are all harmless little kittens either. All men aren’t abusers or rapists either, but none of them need to be in woman’s spaces either.

Your trying too accuse everyone of the actions of a few because you have already decided that they are guilty because you don't understand the core idea of gender identity.

We should address mass shootings in the same manner. If you own a gun then you are a potential mass shooter so we must arrest, limit your rights and jail you, even if you have not committed that crime.

Who is being arrested, or jailed? And rights are already limited because you can’t bring a gun on school property even if you’ve never committed a crime. Sorry that you can’t bring your penis into woman’s spaces just like you can’t bring your gun on school property. See how that works?

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

Not even remotely. But I’m not saying they are all harmless little kittens either. All men aren’t abusers or rapists either, but none of them need to be in woman’s spaces either.

Your trying too accuse everyone of the actions of a few because you have already decided that they are guilty because you don't understand the core idea of gender identity.

We should address mass shootings in the same manner. If you own a gun then you are a potential mass shooter so we must arrest, limit your rights and jail you, even if you have not committed that crime.

If a man chooses to put on a dress and go in the women's room then he's a sexual deviant. End of story. You can add whatever qualifiers to that deviancy you want, but the fact is and will always remain that men are not women and have no business in their restrooms. Period.

Your fallacious attempt at equivalency regarding gun control is the grasping at straws of person who knows his argument is bull [BLEEP].

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Your trying too accuse everyone of the actions of a few because you have already decided that they are guilty because you don't understand the core idea of gender identity.

We should address mass shootings in the same manner. If you own a gun then you are a potential mass shooter so we must arrest, limit your rights and jail you, even if you have not committed that crime.

Who is being arrested, or jailed? And rights are already limited because you can’t bring a gun on school property even if you’ve never committed a crime. Sorry that you can’t bring your penis into woman’s spaces just like you can’t bring your gun on school property. See how that works?

And yet you focus your ire entirely on transgender people.

Do you think rapists are stopped by a sign on a restroom?

I'll bet that 99.9999999999999999999999 percent of all DuvalPride members have NEVER EVER EVER encountered a trans person in their restroom. Same goes for the rest of this goddam [BLEEP] country.

MORAL PANIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

We elected a madman based on manufactured moral panics about bathrooms.

---

Who is being arrested, or jailed? And rights are already limited because you can’t bring a gun on school property even if you’ve never committed a crime. Sorry that you can’t bring your penis into woman’s spaces just like you can’t bring your gun on school property. See how that works?

And yet you focus your ire entirely on transgender people.

Do you think rapists are stopped by a sign on a restroom?

I'll bet that 99.9999999999999999999999 percent of all DuvalPride members have NEVER EVER EVER encountered a trans person in their restroom. Same goes for the rest of this goddam [BLEEP] country.

MORAL PANIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

We elected a madman based on manufactured moral panics about bathrooms.

You really are an idiot.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

And yet you focus your ire entirely on transgender people.

Do you think rapists are stopped by a sign on a restroom?

I'll bet that 99.9999999999999999999999 percent of all DuvalPride members have NEVER EVER EVER encountered a trans person in their restroom. Same goes for the rest of this goddam [BLEEP] country.

MORAL PANIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

We elected a madman based on manufactured moral panics about bathrooms.

You really are an idiot.

He has a young family but wastes precious time and attention to spout vituperation on the message board of a perennially losing sports team located on another continent. It's tragic, really.

---

And yet you focus your ire entirely on transgender people.

Do you think rapists are stopped by a sign on a restroom?

I'll bet that 99.9999999999999999999999 percent of all DuvalPride members have NEVER EVER EVER encountered a trans person in their restroom. Same goes for the rest of this goddam [BLEEP] country.

MORAL PANIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

We elected a madman based on manufactured moral panics about bathrooms.

You really are an idiot.

No your post is really confusing. I am confused. Why does it bother you so much when it doesn’t seem to bother women as much?

I would worry a lot more about American men who sexually assault women like the future president of the United States

---

You really are an idiot.

No your post is really confusing. I am confused. Why does it bother you so much when it doesn’t seem to bother women as much?

I would worry a lot more about American men who sexually assault women like the future president of the United States

Dude, I am a woman.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

No your post is really confusing. I am confused. Why does it bother you so much when it doesn’t seem to bother women as much?

I would worry a lot more about American men who sexually assault women like the future president of the United States

Dude, I am a woman.

Ok? Simple fix: Stop looking at people's crotch.  You'll get over it with time.

---

Dude, I am a woman.

Ok? Simple fix: Stop looking at people's crotch.  You'll get over it with time.

And even simpler fix, keep your penis in the men’s rooms, men’s locker rooms and men’s dressing room and we won’t have to worry about it. You’ll get over not being able to cosplay being a girl in the woman’s spaces with time.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

I have encountered trans in restrooms and gym locker rooms several times. It was a bit unsettling because there have been men arrested for claiming they're trans while in a women's restroom and not being dressed up like one. They were pervs trying to use the system.

If the trans is dressed as a woman that is less threatening to me personally than a man who doesn't bother to dress up but claims he's trans. I still believe it's wrong though.

---

Look, this is a simple argument if it wasn't politicized. This isn't really about women at all.

Human beings are gyno-centric. We build our subconsciously build our cultures around protecting the female egg, and these behaviors mistakenly are seen as being pro or anti woman. This is because if you have a village of 1000 women and 1000 men, if you sent the women to war and 900 died, it would be impossible to reestablish your village. However, if you sent 1000 men to war, you could easily repopulate with little to no drop-off. This idea gets transferred to the woman, but it's more about the egg and survival of the species.

This can look oppressive in cultures where violence is common. For example, in certain places in the Middle East, it may seem oppressive to have women cover their bodies from head to toe and be escorted by their husband or father. However, in a society where there's prevalence of violence against women, these oppressive measures actually help to protect the egg. In more modern cultures, these measures can be loosened. The West has built a strict set of codes that are enforced in largely non-biased institutions. The safer women feel, the more inclined society is to loosen the protection of the egg.

This gets taken to the furthest extremes by groups who don't value human reproduction, so it makes sense this finds a voice in the LGBTQ+ communities and climate alarmists. The less that is a societal value, the more likely a movement forms to remove all protections that might insulate the egg. Rape or discomfort is not really the driving force for these laws, but we think that because of political branding.

Personally, I think it's incredibly stupid to remove laws that protect the egg. It's short-sighted, anti-human, and potentially harmful to our society.

---

Look, this is a simple argument if it wasn't politicized. This isn't really about women at all.

Human beings are gyno-centric. We build our subconsciously build our cultures around protecting the female egg, and these behaviors mistakenly are seen as being pro or anti woman. This is because if you have a village of 1000 women and 1000 men, if you sent the women to war and 900 died, it would be impossible to reestablish your village. However, if you sent 1000 men to war, you could easily repopulate with little to no drop-off. This idea gets transferred to the woman, but it's more about the egg and survival of the species.

This can look oppressive in cultures where violence is common. For example, in certain places in the Middle East, it may seem oppressive to have women cover their bodies from head to toe and be escorted by their husband or father. However, in a society where there's prevalence of violence against women, these oppressive measures actually help to protect the egg. In more modern cultures, these measures can be loosened. The West has built a strict set of codes that are enforced in largely non-biased institutions. The safer women feel, the more inclined society is to loosen the protection of the egg.

This gets taken to the furthest extremes by groups who don't value human reproduction, so it makes sense this finds a voice in the LGBTQ+ communities and climate alarmists. The less that is a societal value, the more likely a movement forms to remove all protections that might insulate the egg. Rape or discomfort is not really the driving force for these laws, but we think that because of political branding.

Personally, I think it's incredibly stupid to remove laws that protect the egg. It's short-sighted, anti-human, and potentially harmful to our society.

Good lord, now he's going to rant about how normies only care about the price of eggs.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Look, this is a simple argument if it wasn't politicized. This isn't really about women at all.

Human beings are gyno-centric. We build our subconsciously build our cultures around protecting the female egg, and these behaviors mistakenly are seen as being pro or anti woman. This is because if you have a village of 1000 women and 1000 men, if you sent the women to war and 900 died, it would be impossible to reestablish your village. However, if you sent 1000 men to war, you could easily repopulate with little to no drop-off. This idea gets transferred to the woman, but it's more about the egg and survival of the species.

This can look oppressive in cultures where violence is common. For example, in certain places in the Middle East, it may seem oppressive to have women cover their bodies from head to toe and be escorted by their husband or father. However, in a society where there's prevalence of violence against women, these oppressive measures actually help to protect the egg. In more modern cultures, these measures can be loosened. The West has built a strict set of codes that are enforced in largely non-biased institutions. The safer women feel, the more inclined society is to loosen the protection of the egg.

This gets taken to the furthest extremes by groups who don't value human reproduction, so it makes sense this finds a voice in the LGBTQ+ communities and climate alarmists. The less that is a societal value, the more likely a movement forms to remove all protections that might insulate the egg. Rape or discomfort is not really the driving force for these laws, but we think that because of political branding.

Personally, I think it's incredibly stupid to remove laws that protect the egg. It's short-sighted, anti-human, and potentially harmful to our society.

Good lord, now he's going to rant about how normies only care about the price of eggs.

I laughed way too hard at this!

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

There are people on here that voted for this.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/18..._PKhQ&s=19

---

There are people on here that voted for this.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/18..._PKhQ&s=19

There are people on here that would vote for that again..

---

There are people on here that voted for this.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/18..._PKhQ&s=19

You voted for a rapist and a felon. 

When Democrats win elections: We look forward to implementing a progressive agenda that will simultaneously promote economic strength while protecting economically vulnerable people.

When Republicans win elections:

WE OWN THA LIBZ!
LIBRUL TEARS, HAHA!
HEY, DID I TELL YOU - THAT WE OWN THE LIBZ!!! HA! HA!
SUCK IT UP, BUTTERCUP!
DON'T MELT, SNOWFLAKE!
HEY, LIB! I GOT YOUR SAFE SPACE FOR YA, LOLZ!
GO BACK TO AFRICA/CHINA/MEXICO/KOSOVO/OR WHATEVER [BLEEP] YOU CAME FROM HA HA HA!!!

---

There are people on here that voted for this.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/18..._PKhQ&s=19

There are people on here that would vote for that again..

Imagine spending 5-9 AM on a Wednesday morning the day before Thanksgiving hating on former female political candidates online. Pretty pathetic.

---

There are people on here that voted for this.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/18..._PKhQ&s=19

You voted for a rapist and a felon. 

When Democrats win elections: We look forward to implementing a progressive agenda that will simultaneously promote economic strength while protecting economically vulnerable people.

When Republicans win elections:

WE OWN THA LIBZ!
LIBRUL TEARS, HAHA!
HEY, DID I TELL YOU - THAT WE OWN THE LIBZ!!! HA! HA!
SUCK IT UP, BUTTERCUP!
DON'T MELT, SNOWFLAKE!
HEY, LIB! I GOT YOUR SAFE SPACE FOR YA, LOLZ!
GO BACK TO AFRICA/CHINA/MEXICO/KOSOVO/OR WHATEVER [BLEEP] YOU CAME FROM HA HA HA!!!

---

There are people on here that would vote for that again..

Imagine spending 5-9 AM on a Wednesday morning the day before Thanksgiving hating on former female political candidates online. Pretty pathetic.

You say something, Pete?

---

Why do you want grown men in girls bathrooms again?

---