Army of 100 Navy SEALs Target DC for Huge Move to Ensure Hegseth Confirmed

When it comes to Defense Secretary-nominee Pete Hegseth, Republican senators could soon be hearing from some of the men who actually matter.
Since President-elect Donald Trump nominated the combat veteran to lead the nation’s military, attacks from liberal media organizations have grown even as Hegseth’s friends and colleagues have rallied to his defense.
But now, Fox News’ Will Cain declared Wednesday, some of those who’ve made military service their lives’ work are going to make their voices heard, and Republicans weak on Hegseth better be listening.


Report: Army of 100 Navy SEALs Target DC for Huge Move to Ensure Hegseth Confirmed

---

The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..

The rinos need to go..

---

The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..

The rinos need to go..

Maybe they do.  We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..

The rinos need to go..

Maybe they do.  We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.

According to Elon, they'll be primaried and sent packing, just like Pig Cheney..

---

Maybe they do.  We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.

According to Elon, they'll be primaried and sent packing, just like Pig Cheney..

Elon must have read Pelosi's book

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..

The rinos need to go..

Maybe they do.  We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.

They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.

---

Maybe they do.  We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.

They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.

Of course. 
But in this role they are citizens like you and me.  I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.

Of course. 
But in this role they are citizens like you and me.  I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.

That's not entirely true. 

Link

According to military law experts, DoD Directive 1344.10 dictates whether active-duty military members can participate in political activities, including protests and rallies.

That directive, they say, does allow military members to personally engage in partisan activities, including writing letters to the editor for or against a specific candidate or attending events as spectators out of uniform.

But it blocks them from leading or actively participating in those events, publishing partisan political statements outside of a letter to the editor, speaking at any political gathering or soliciting votes.

---

Of course. 
But in this role they are citizens like you and me.  I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.

That's not entirely true. 

Link

According to military law experts, DoD Directive 1344.10 dictates whether active-duty military members can participate in political activities, including protests and rallies.

That directive, they say, does allow military members to personally engage in partisan activities, including writing letters to the editor for or against a specific candidate or attending events as spectators out of uniform.

But it blocks them from leading or actively participating in those events, publishing partisan political statements outside of a letter to the editor, speaking at any political gathering or soliciting votes.

I wouldn't want active military engaged in rallies or demonstrations.  Imagine if the January 6 protestors who invaded the Capitol had been active military and armed, organized and led by their officers.

---

That's not entirely true. 

Link

According to military law experts, DoD Directive 1344.10 dictates whether active-duty military members can participate in political activities, including protests and rallies.

That directive, they say, does allow military members to personally engage in partisan activities, including writing letters to the editor for or against a specific candidate or attending events as spectators out of uniform.

But it blocks them from leading or actively participating in those events, publishing partisan political statements outside of a letter to the editor, speaking at any political gathering or soliciting votes.

I wouldn't want active military engaged in rallies or demonstrations.  Imagine if the January 6 protestors who invaded the Capitol had been active military and armed, organized and led by their officers.

---

I wouldn't want active military engaged in rallies or demonstrations.  Imagine if the January 6 protestors who invaded the Capitol had been active military and armed, organized and led by their officers.

Yes.  That's the difference between a riot and a military coup.

---

Yes.  That's the difference between a riot and a military coup.

Picture of TDSer milking January 6th for every last ounce of hyperbole. 

---

Yes.  That's the difference between a riot and a military coup.

Picture of TDSer milking January 6th for every last ounce of hyperbole. 

I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that.  Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.

---

Picture of TDSer milking January 6th for every last ounce of hyperbole. 

I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that.  Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.

We know you prefer this.


https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19

---

I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that.  Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.

We know you prefer this.


https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19

So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup?  Which one would you prefer?

---

We know you prefer this.


https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19

So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup?  Which one would you prefer?

You’re trying hard to miss that point. He is saying you are fine with a soft coup as opposed to a violent one.

A coup is a coup.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup?  Which one would you prefer?

You’re trying hard to miss that point. He is saying you are fine with a soft coup as opposed to a violent one.

A coup is a coup.

So the question is, would I prefer transgenders in the military to a violent military coup?  Is that the question?  He did use the word "prefer."  So yes, if my choice was between transgender people in the military or a violent military coup, I would have to choose the former.  Wouldn't you?

---

I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that.  Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.

We know you prefer this.


https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19

Isn't it funny that these low life scumbags on this site kept their mouths shut about the garbage that went on the last 4 years under Biden, but piss themselves over Trump appointments?

And they call themselves republicans lololololol

---

They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.

Of course. 
But in this role they are citizens like you and me.  I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.

As usual you are wrong.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup?  Which one would you prefer?

You’re trying hard to miss that point. He is saying you are fine with a soft coup as opposed to a violent one.

A coup is a coup.

Are you implying that transgender soldiers and officers are inherently illegitimate and not duly appointed or enlisted?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.