The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Watkins Trade Up Rumor
|
Quote:Uhmmm, no....Yet, there D is that of a pop Warner team. You can have Manning as QB there, that team with that D would still come up short. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:For the Jags to move back to 10 from 3, I'd be only willing to do it for their (Detroit's) 2nd rounder in 2014, their 3rd rounder in 2014, plus their 1st rounder in 2015.If there isn't a franchise QB there in Caldwell's eyes and especially if Clowney is gone, I'd do that in a heartbeat. Quote:Yet, there D is that of a pop Warner team. You can have Manning as QB there, that team with that D would still come up short.I don't agree with that. If they upgrade their secondary, they can have a solid defense. They have a good front 7. Quote:I gotta be honest, while I do like the idea of bringing in a haul of draft picks, it just seems like #10 will put us out of some really good players. I don't even think Barr will be around by that point, and he's at the fringe of the that "really really good player" level. I would say possibly Bridgewater/Manziel/best available QB.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Quote:I don't agree with that. If they upgrade their secondary, they can have a solid defense. They have a good front 7.They do have a good front 7 yes, but there secondary is horrid, if and that's a big if they can improve that secondary they could be a great team. You also have Caldwell as coach so that adds another big IF We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:I would say possibly Bridgewater/Manziel/best available QB.I'd be very impressed if we dropped to #10 and managed to get either of those guys. It'd be a good first day assuming the initial compensation for the trade was right, for sure.
THERE IS A SKELETON INSIDE OF YOU.
RIGHT NOW. THIS IS NOT A JOKE.
So funny how people want a QB at 10 but not at 3. No difference at all. For other positions yes, not QB.
Quote:So funny how people want a QB at 10 but not at 3. No difference at all. For other positions yes, not QB. The Ravens could have taken Flacco at pick 8 but instead they traded down and got more picks and still drafted Flacco. Why take a player before you need to? You can maximize your value by trading down to where the pick fits.
Quote:The Ravens could have taken Flacco at pick 8 but instead they traded down and got more picks and still drafted Flacco. Why take a player before you need to? You can maximize your value by trading down to where the pick fits. They ended up having to trade back up for him though. Essentially they netted Tavaris Gooden who was a non factor. They basically took him at 8. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:So funny how people want a QB at 10 but not at 3. No difference at all. For other positions yes, not QB.Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. If he's your guy, you grab him right away and don't look back.
Quote:Uhmmm, no....ummm no what? they don't have other needs? I forgot you had to have 2 top 5 picks at WR to have a successful offense Quote:They ended up having to trade back up for him though. Essentially they netted Tavaris Gooden who was a non factor. They basically took him at 8. Just because they didn't use their draft pick wisely doesn't meant it wasn't worth it. Also that was before the new CBA so they saved a ton of money in the trade.
Quote:Just because they didn't use their draft pick wisely doesn't meant it wasn't worth it. Also that was before the new CBA so they saved a ton of money in the trade. I didn't mean it wasn't a good decision, just that, value wise it ended up being the same as picking him at 8. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
@10 give me one of:
Evans Dennard Barr Gilbert Ebron Ha-Ha Bortles/Bridgewater
Quote:You have a source of this crazy talk? The voice in my head wouldn't give a name...for now I shall call him Philip.
"Don't argue with an idiot, people watching may not be able to tell the difference."
Quote:So funny how people want a QB at 10 but not at 3. No difference at all. For other positions yes, not QB. Very true. I know many people who think #3 is way to high to pick Bridgewater or Manziel, but in the same breath will talk about Bridgewater and Manziel being selected by the Browns, Raiders, Vikings, etc, just 1 or 2 or 3 picks later. :blink:
I want 3 players. Clowney, Bridgewater, Manziel. Jaguars have the number 3 pick. Just give me one of those 3 at 3, and I'm happy.
My top 6 favorite posters on these boards Deacon Pirkster Shack Del Rio Haterade Hurricane Badger Quote:So funny how people want a QB at 10 but not at 3. No difference at all. For other positions yes, not QB. Extra picks = "no difference at all." Real rocket scientist, you are.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Yet, there D is that of a pop Warner team. You can have Manning as QB there, that team with that D would still come up short. Giving up the 13th least amount of points and 17th least amount of yards in 2013 is that of a pop Warner team? What does it say for the 19 teams that gave up more points and the 15 teams that gave up more yards??? Quote:For the Jags to move back to 10 from 3, I'd be only willing to do it for their (Detroit's) 2nd rounder in 2014, their 3rd rounder in 2014, plus their 1st rounder in 2015. The Jags should indeed try to maximize the value of pick # 3. But you are right, the Lions aren't going to give up that much for the rights to Sammy Watkins or any player in the draft. Each draft has different dynamics. Yet, it's worth keeping in mind that in the 2013 Draft, Oakland only got a 2nd Round pick from Miami from trading down from pick # 3 to pick # 12. The Raiders ended up selecting Houston CB D.J. Hayden with pick # 12.
Quote:Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. If he's your guy, you grab him right away and don't look back. Oh, you mean the philosophy that lands you Alualu at 11 overall. :confused: |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.