If he is as great as you think he is, he will be long gone before this scenario plays out. So, you can relax about it and not get too worked up.

This is true.

---

Trading up in deep drafts is foolish.

Stop derailing the thread TMD! Lol

---

This is where the problem lies with this scenario.  Now with people watching more and more game tape on Teddy, you, a couple people on this site, and Matt Miller seem to be the only ones to believe this as of late.  I guess he could go 1st to the Texans, i mean Kwame Brown went 1st to the Wizards years ago and nobody had him going that high.  We shall see soon enough I guess.

The only people knocking Teddy are major media that intentionally wants to stir the pot to drive ratings, and 'unnamed sources'. Virtually every other expert still has Teddy comfortably as the top QB in this class, and for obvious reasons.

---

only 1 more month to go until this nonsense ends

---

The only people knocking Teddy are major media that intentionally wants to stir the pot to drive ratings, and 'unnamed sources'. Virtually every other expert still has Teddy comfortably as the top QB in this class, and for obvious reasons.

 

He's definitely the top QB in this class, there's no question about it.

---

Getting the most explosive WR and the most NFL ready QB and only losing a 3 and 4 is a steal

Yes.

 

Losing a 3rd round pick to get the best WR and QB in the class is a bad thing?

Yes(to this not being a bad thing)

 

 If you can get a top QB prospect for two day 2s and a day 3 pick it's a no brainer...especially if you have tons of other picks already.

Yes!

 

Yes to all this

---

I want 3 players. Clowney, Bridgewater, Manziel. Jaguars have the number 3 pick. Just give me one of those 3 at 3, and I'm happy.

 

My top 6 favorite posters on these boards

Deacon
Pirkster
Shack Del Rio
Haterade
Hurricane
Badger

only 1 more month to go until this nonsense ends

The nonsense never ends

---

If he is as great as you think he is, he will be long gone before this scenario plays out. So, you can relax about it and not get too worked up.

First of all nobody knows which of these players gonna end up being great so thats meaningless, Rodgers fell and is great, Brady was a 6 rounder and hes great, look at Russel Wilson and Drew Brees. Come on now dont come with that if he's great as you think he is stuff, with all those bust QBs going higher then guys who turn out good that fall in the draft .

---

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>

Wait, you people are complaining that a 2, 3, and 4 to get the best QB in the draft is bad? Sheesh. 

 

That's debatable.  Remember when he was the undisputed first pick in the draft, and people were opining the fact that we lost out on him when we started winning games?  Yeah, now there's speculation he slides to the middle of the first round or further, and what's worse?  Other QBs are mocked to go ahead of him.  That tells me he's probably NOT the best QB in the draft when the dust settles.  In that case, yes, it's okay to think giving up multiple picks to go get a guy like Bridgewater is a bad move.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

First of all nobody knows which of these players gonna end up being great so thats meaningless, Rodgers fell and is great, Brady was a 6 rounder and hes great, look at Russel Wilson and Drew Brees. Come on now dont come with that if he's great as you think he is stuff, with all those bust QBs going higher then guys who turn out good that fall in the draft .

 

And he may very well turn out to be great despite the current slide.  I just don't see trading up to find out.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I would love a combination of the Walter draft in the other thread when we trade down and get Evans and this draft when we use the extra picks to move back up and get Bridgewater. We would still have 10 total picks but now two are in the first and we only lost a third.

---

The only people knocking Teddy are major media that intentionally wants to stir the pot to drive ratings, and 'unnamed sources'. Virtually every other expert still has Teddy comfortably as the top QB in this class, and for obvious reasons.

Yea people need to watch Path to the Draft on NFL network, they have guys how worked in the NFL for years and been in those war rooms, those guys havent flinched much on their boards. They need to stop reading these blog mock drafts and taking ESPN hype as gospel. At the end of the day these guys are getting over analyzed and thats how you end up with Blaine Gabbert . 

---

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>

And he may very well turn out to be great despite the current slide.  I just don't see trading up to find out.

Yea I understand not wanting to trade up to have many draft picks, but to say a guy is not as good because he fell is foolish, like these GM's never make mistakes and pass on better players.

---

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>

I would love a combination of the Walter draft in the other thread when we trade down and get Evans and this draft when we use the extra picks to move back up and get Bridgewater. We would still have 10 total picks but now two are in the first and we only lost a third.

Actually 11 picks 1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5,6,6,7

---

Lousy mock.  Giving up all those picks to go back into the 1st to get Bridgewater?  And this bunch thinks the fans would be ecstatic?  Hardly. 

 

Exactly! Whats even more silly is to do all that and then let the better QB slip one pick behind to the Cardinals. Idiotic mock for sure. 

---

Trading up in deep drafts is foolish. 

 

You and others keep saying this. Please give me an example of a "deep" draft. What does that even mean?

 

If you look at the past decade maybe even two, please show me a draft where there was an abundance of talent in each round that turned into anything?

---

That's debatable.

Nothing KYJaggy says is debatable. He is a draft expert after all.


Just ask him.

---

Yea I understand not wanting to trade up to have many draft picks, but to say a guy is not as good because he fell is foolish, like these GM's never make mistakes and pass on better players.

I'm not saying he's not good.  I'm saying he's not as good as the hype that surrounded him early on.  He's falling for a reason.  It's not just the pro day.  I think there are legitimate concerns there that existed all along, but the media was determined to build him up as they're known to do. 

 

GMs make mistakes all the time.  Hopefully they don't cost you multiple draft picks in the process.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

That's debatable.  Remember when he was the undisputed first pick in the draft, and people were opining the fact that we lost out on him when we started winning games?  Yeah, now there's speculation he slides to the middle of the first round or further, and what's worse?  Other QBs are mocked to go ahead of him.  That tells me he's probably NOT the best QB in the draft when the dust settles.  In that case, yes, it's okay to think giving up multiple picks to go get a guy like Bridgewater is a bad move.

 

Ever consider that Caldwell might not agree with other teams on Bridgewater?


The Best QB in the draft doesn't always go first.  Alex Smith over Aaron Rodgers.  Vince Young (and Matt Leinart) went over Jay Cutler.  Micahel Vick went before Drew Brees.  

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Ever consider that Caldwell might not agree with other teams on Bridgewater?


The Best QB in the draft doesn't always go first. Alex Smith over Aaron Rodgers. Vince Young (and Matt Leinart) went over Jay Cutler. Micahel Vick went before Drew Brees.

That is exactly why you stay put and not trade away picks to move up for anybody.


You never know if an Aaron Rodgers will fall to you.

---