Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
New York Times article on Jameis Winston

(This post was last modified: 04-19-2014, 09:48 AM by WingerDinger.)

Quote:Your understanding of the legal system is completely warped.

 

That does not mean anyone is ever proved innocent.

 

All people are assumed to be innocent and they have to be proved guilty. No court in the history of the civilized world has ever proved anyone innocent of anything, that's not what they do.

 

Before you jump in with your ridiculous paranoia with your bla bla, you're calling Winston guilty, actually read what I've written.
 

Are you talking (posting)?

 

Sorry, I stopped my argument with you when you decided to accuse me of something I didn't do.. Which I'm pretty sure that's your MO..


[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Are you talking (posting)?

 

Sorry, I stopped my argument with you when you decided to accuse me of something I didn't do.. Which I'm pretty sure that's your MO..
 

Yes I am. You something stupid on a public forum, I decided to respond this time. If you don't want me talking to you, either don't put your (incorrect) thoughts in public, block me or report me.

 

Once again, go back and read, actually read what I have said. Don't just go 'OMGZZZZ UR DIZAGREEEIN WIV ME THAT MEANS YOUR ACUSING ME OF STUFF!!!11' like a petulant child. I never did any such thing and you are flat out lying and deliberately misinterpreting what I've said if you think I have ever:

A) Stated anywhere that Jameis Winston is a guilty of anything or

B) Accused you of anything. (I don't know you, I have literally no clue - and very little inclination to find out - what's going on in your life, let alone comment on it)

 

I think whatever personal stuff you are going through has made it impossible for you to have a rational conversation because you're so defensive. (Now that is an accusation, compare it to the other stuff I've said for reference).

Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply


Quote:Yes I am. (1)You something stupid on a public forum, I decided to respond this time. If you don't want me talking to you, either don't put your (incorrect) thoughts in public, block me or report me.

 

Once again, go back and read, actually read what I have said. (2) Don't just go 'OMGZZZZ UR DIZAGREEEIN WIV ME THAT MEANS YOUR ACUSING ME OF STUFF!!!11' like a petulant child. I never did any such thing and you are flat out lying and deliberately misinterpreting what I've said if you think I have ever:

A) Stated anywhere that Jameis Winston is a guilty of anything or

B) Accused you of anything. (3)I don't know you, I have literally no clue - and very little inclination to find out - what's going on in your life, let alone comment on it)

 

I think whatever personal stuff you are going through has made it impossible for you to have a rational conversation because you're so defensive. (Now that is an accusation, compare it to the other stuff I've said for reference).
 

(1) If the shoe fits, Bubba.. Complete sentences would help your argument, but I'm starting to think that's about as incapable for you as that oxymoronic screen name of yours.. 

 

(2) If "OMGZZZZ UR DIZAGREEEIN WIV ME THAT MEANS YOUR ACUSING ME OF STUFF!!!11", is what you've read and understood for me to say, that sounds like a personal problem maybe a little further education in your life can remedy.. There's definitely grades beyond the 4th.. Check it out sometime..

 

(3) Thank God for small favors. I wouldn't want you to know me.. I don't need an agenda driven, falsely accusing, prepubescent child who makes irrational decisions trying to hang onto my coat tails on my journey through life.

 

And no, I don't block anyone.. Trust me, the stupidity is entertainment to me.. And you're a barrel of laughs :yes:  

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:Then what are you saying? You criticize people view points yet you still have not said yours.



That's funny...most people in this thread, minus the completely obvious homers, have stated that they don't know whether he did it or not, but I'm the only one that's unqualified to talk about it. Rolleyes
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply


Quote:(1) If the shoe fits, Bubba.. Complete sentences would help your argument, but I'm starting to think that's about as incapable for you as that oxymoronic screen name of yours.. 

 

(2) If "OMGZZZZ UR DIZAGREEEIN WIV ME THAT MEANS YOUR ACUSING ME OF STUFF!!!11", is what you've read and understood for me to say, that sounds like a personal problem maybe a little further education in your life can remedy.. There's definitely grades beyond the 4th.. Check it out sometime..

 

(3) Thank God for small favors. I wouldn't want you to know me.. I don't need an agenda driven, falsely accusing, prepubescent child who makes irrational decisions trying to hang onto my coat tails on my journey through life.

 

And no, I don't block anyone.. Trust me, the stupidity is entertainment to me.. And you're a barrel of laughs :yes:  
 

Yup.

 

Personal issues, leading to inability to have a conversation.

Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Yup.

 

Personal issues, leading to inability to have a conversation.
 

I think I've said enough to you.. I think I got my point across.. 

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:I think I've said enough to you.. I think I got my point across.. 
 

Yup, you've done a spectacular job of getting across the point that you dont understand the very basics of the legal system, have some sort of narcissistic complex that makes you think you are the topic of conversation when you are definitely not, completely fail to understand the difference in meanings between the words accusation, investigation and guilty, that you are so defensive and paranoid you think everyone is out to get you, that you have some iffy at best views on women and sexual violence and that overall if you are losing an argument you will simply make stuff up.

 

Well done.

Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply


Quote:That's funny...most people in this thread, minus the completely obvious homers, have stated that they don't know whether he did it or not, but I'm the only one that's unqualified to talk about it. Rolleyes
 

Just my two cents, in case anyone missed it about a thousand posts ago...

 

I don't know if he did it, and he is entitled to a presumption of innocence.   That said, I have a suspicion that all is not right with Jameis Winston.   The story of the second woman who needed counseling after having consensual sex with him is part of it.  In addition, I can't see why the accuser would have any motivation to accuse him falsely.    Of course, there is the possibility that he actually thinks it was consensual and she actually thinks it was rape.  

 

Put me on a jury, knowing what I know right now, and I would have to vote not guilty.   But I would feel very uneasy about it. 

 

Regardless, if I was an NFL GM and I had the chance to draft him, I would hire every private detective in the world to find out who Jameis Winston really is on the inside before I invested my future in the guy.  

Reply


Quote:Yup, you've done a spectacular job of getting across the point that you dont understand the very basics of the legal system, have some sort of narcissistic complex that makes you think you are the topic of conversation when you are definitely not, completely fail to understand the difference in meanings between the words accusation, investigation and guilty, that you are so defensive and paranoid you think everyone is out to get you, that you have some iffy at best views on women and sexual violence and that overall if you are losing an argument you will simply make stuff up.

 

Well done.
 

TL;DR

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Just my two cents, in case anyone missed it about a thousand posts ago...

 

I don't know if he did it, and he is entitled to a presumption of innocence.   That said, I have a suspicion that all is not right with Jameis Winston.   The story of the second woman who needed counseling after having consensual sex with him is part of it.  In addition, I can't see why the accuser would have any motivation to accuse him falsely.    Of course, there is the possibility that he actually thinks it was consensual and she actually thinks it was rape.  

 

Put me on a jury, knowing what I know right now, and I would have to vote not guilty.   But I would feel very uneasy about it. 

 

Regardless, if I was an NFL GM and I had the chance to draft him, I would hire every private detective in the world to find out who Jameis Winston really is on the inside before I invested my future in the guy.  
 

The most honest post I've read in this thread to date.. 

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:The most honest post I've read in this thread to date.. 
 

Thanks, but I think most of us in this thread are being honest.   We just have different opinions.  

Reply


Quote:Thanks, but I think most of us in this thread are being honest.   We just have different opinions.  
 

Some, but from my point of view, I'll call them "agenda's"..

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:The most honest post I've read in this thread to date.. 
 

Lol, so the guy who says Jameis Winston 'is not right' and he would feel uneasy acquitting him is not making judgements and I am.

 

HAAAAAAAAAAAHAHA!

Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Lol, so the guy who says Jameis Winston 'is not right' and he would feel uneasy acquitting him is not making judgements and I am.

 

HAAAAAAAAAAAHAHA!
 

It's because clearly he didn't purchase any pitchforks or torches to enter this thread with.. Unlike some on here...

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:It's because clearly he didn't purchase any pitchforks or torches to enter this thread with.. Unlike some on here...



I hope those carrying pitchforks going after the girl are included in this statement....
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply


Quote:I hope those carrying pitchforks going after the girl are included in this statement....
 

You can include it if you like.. I don't see any reason to go after her at all.. 

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:You can include it if you like.. I don't see any reason to go after her at all..



You don't, but you've also read through this thread.
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:It's because clearly he didn't purchase any pitchforks or torches to enter this thread with.. Unlike some on here...
 

Making stuff up is fun.

 

I can only assume, you got really riled up because you misread what I've said and now for whatever reason are completely incapable of climbing down of that really high horse built of straw because of pride. I didn't say anything as nearly accusatory as 'all is not right with Winston', yet the guy who did is being honest and I'm the guy who was making judgements.

 

Seriously, have some herbal tea, calm down and re read this thread.

Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply


Quote:Making stuff up is fun.

 

I can only assume, you got really riled up because you misread what I've said and now for whatever reason are completely incapable of climbing down of that really high horse built of straw because of pride. I didn't say anything as nearly accusatory as 'all is not right with Winston', yet the guy who did is being honest and I'm the guy who was making judgements.

 

Seriously, have some herbal tea, calm down and re read this thread.
 

Once again, TL;DR

[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


Quote:Once again, TL;DR
 

Ah this argument.

[Image: lalalala-listening.jpg]

 

Once again, well done.

Quote:Just to be different, Bortles.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!