Your picking a QB and you have Luck, Foles, and McCown on the board. 

 

Who are you going to pick?

 

/argument

 

Tommy would take McCown.

---

Your picking a QB and you have Luck, Foles, and McCown on the board. 

 

Who are you going to pick?

 

/argument

 

If Foles plays like he did last year then give me Saint Nick every day.

---

Luck is ok, the Colts are not Manning scary anymore. With that said they are still the class of the weakest division in football.

---

<!-- isHtml:1 --><!-- isHtml:1 -->;

;

The Colts aren't as good as some may have once thought. Clowney is going to enter the AFC South and if the drafts go well for HOU/JAX/TEN the Colts could fall back to second or third best team in the division.

---

The Colts aren't as good as some may have once thought. Clowney is going to enter the AFC South and if the drafts go well for HOU/JAX/TEN the Colts could fall back to second or third best team in the division.

 

If the Jags, Texans, or Titans don't get a quality QB, there will be no affect on the AFC South.

---

They aren't even that good.

 

I get called a troll because I have an assumption that a team who traded a 1st round pick for a running back isn't run by a very smart front office.

 

Andrew Luck is average. T.Y. Hilton will be a jag killer for years to come, though. Believe that.

 

Yet you said you would take a "average" Luck over Gabbert/Henne in the other thread right?

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

If the Jags, Texans, or Titans don't get a quality QB, there will be no affect on the AFC South.

And if the colts QB suffers a serious injury, they'd fade away pretty quickly as well. Thanks for stating the obvious. Happy to return the favor.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Yet you said you would take a "average" Luck over Gabbert/Henne in the other thread right?

Yes, I would. 

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

Ya. Nick Foles is the best QB in the league and Josh McCown is the 3rd best.

 

You really love making yourself look foolish, don't you?

Nick Foles had the best QBR for 2013. He played extremely well. 

 

Your picking a QB and you have Luck, Foles, and McCown on the board. 

 

Who are you going to pick?

 

/argument

 

Right now in their development? Foles.

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

And if the colts QB suffers a serious injury, they'd fade away pretty quickly as well. Thanks for stating the obvious. Happy to return the favor.

 

Ummm... I don't think you understand what's going on here.

 

The person I quoted stated nothing about getting a QB. He stated Clowney was going to come into the division and if other teams in the division "draft well" the Colts could fall in the division. Hence why I said if a QB is not taken the Colts will not fall in the division.

 

Catch up.

---

Nobody should be scared of any team in this division.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if any of the teams finished top or bottom this year. Atleast Jags/Houston/Tennessee have good draft picks though to try and improve their sides while the Colts seem to have turned into the redskins of a few years back.

---

Ummm... I don't think you understand what's going on here.

 

The person I quoted stated nothing about getting a QB. He stated Clowney was going to come into the division and if other teams in the division "draft well" the Colts could fall in the division. Hence why I said if a QB is not taken the Colts will not fall in the division.

 

Catch up.

 

I got that point.  I was responding to yours.  Are you confusing yourself here?

 

If the Jags landed Clowney, and he (or any defensive lineman in the division for that matter) injured your QB, the colts would be a bottom dweller in the blink of an eye.  Getting a QB in this draft wouldn't change the dynamic in the division as quickly as landing a difference maker who can disrupt Luck.  It's not that difficult to understand. 

 

BTW, what stud are the colts going after in the first round this year?

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I got that point.  I was responding to yours.  Are you confusing yourself here?

 

If the Jags landed Clowney, and he (or any defensive lineman in the division for that matter) injured your QB, the colts would be a bottom dweller in the blink of an eye.  Getting a QB in this draft wouldn't change the dynamic in the division as quickly as landing a difference maker who can disrupt Luck.  It's not that difficult to understand. 

 

BTW, what stud are the colts going after in the first round this year?

Oh yeah, they do got that Richardson guy. 

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

I got that point.  I was responding to yours.  Are you confusing yourself here?

 

If the Jags landed Clowney, and he (or any defensive lineman in the division for that matter) injured your QB, the colts would be a bottom dweller in the blink of an eye.  Getting a QB in this draft wouldn't change the dynamic in the division as quickly as landing a difference maker who can disrupt Luck.  It's not that difficult to understand. 

 

BTW, what stud are the colts going after in the first round this year?

 

Lol. Right. If Luck did get hurt, we would suffer this year. Correct (even though I thought he was just average, if he was just average we wouldn't suffer...). However, if your best draft pick is a defensive player and he doesn't injure Luck, Colts won't suffer. Sorry, need a QB in this league and Jags haven't shown the ability to draft a good one.

 

BTW, what bust are you going to draft this year? Best part of the draft... watching the Jags take someone knowing that it won't mean anything in the end

 

EDIT: Also sad that your only hope is injuring Luck     

---

Lolz did someone really just pick Foles over Luck?

---

Lolz did someone really just pick Foles over Luck?

Comparing their stats, you'd be smart to pick Nick Foles.

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

Lol. Right. If Luck did get hurt, we would suffer this year. Correct (even though I thought he was just average, if he was just average we wouldn't suffer...). However, if your best draft pick is a defensive player and he doesn't injure Luck, Colts won't suffer. Sorry, need a QB in this league and Jags haven't shown the ability to draft a good one.

 

BTW, what bust are you going to draft this year? Best part of the draft... watching the Jags take someone knowing that it won't mean anything in the end

 

EDIT: Also sad that your only hope is injuring Luck     

 

I don't know who we're going to take, but as long as he is better than Trent Richardson, we should be ok.

---

Just to be different, Bortles.

I don't know who we're going to take, but as long as he is better than Trent Richardson, we should be ok.

 

No, if your player is better than TRich and it's not a QB, you'll be in the same place you were in last year.

---

Comparing their stats, you'd be smart to pick Nick Foles.

 

Jags should have went after the 3rd best QB in the league in free agency this year - McCown.

 

Right, Tommy???

---

No, if your player is better than TRich and it's not a QB, you'll be in the same place you were in last year.

 

So only teams who draft QBs get better? You're going to be disappointed in this draft then.

---

Just to be different, Bortles.