Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Rb class

#1

Has there ever been a running back class with such conflicting evaluations? Some guy has a  certain guy #1 and then that same guy isn't even in anothers top 5.


[img]blob:https://www.duvalpride.com/1a8a2498-9833-4b7d-8cc7-5e45aa36d9f6[/img][img=648x560]blob:https://www.duvalpride.com/cfd7a344-8206-4fed-a4c4-6536e150b1a7[/img]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2014, 08:26 PM by JAXsonVIL.)

Sankey, seastrunk, or Mason..I'll take one of em.
Reply

#3

Quote:Sankey, seastrunk, or Mason..I'll take one of em.
Hah, OP being proven right perhaps. I very much dislike Sankey and Seastrunk...and Mason I kinda like but he's going to go way earlier than I would take an RB in this class.

 

Would love to see a late day 3 pick on one of the small school high upside guys like Crowell, McKinnon, etc. No thanks to one until like 6th round tho.

Reply

#4
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2014, 08:44 PM by J-Mizzal.)

Quote:Hah, OP being proven right perhaps. I very much dislike Sankey and Seastrunk...and Mason I kinda like but he's going to go way earlier than I would take an RB in this class.

 

Would love to see a late day 3 pick on one of the small school high upside guys like Crowell, McKinnon, etc. No thanks to one until like 6th round tho.
6th round? You do know our starter is unproven and 27 even tho he doesnt have wear and tear on his body, and the backups are a converted QB and just another guy right?

 

RB in the 4th and wouldnt mind one in the 3rd, bring in a young talented 21, 22 year old to go with Toby 

 

Its a pretty good RB class, the position is just devalued 


<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2014, 08:44 PM by JAXsonVIL.)

Quote:Hah, OP being proven right perhaps. I very much dislike Sankey and Seastrunk...and Mason I kinda like but he's going to go way earlier than I would take an RB in this class.


Would love to see a late day 3 pick on one of the small school high upside guys like Crowell, McKinnon, etc. No thanks to one until like 6th round tho.
I'm a fan of Crowell as well. He may be there in the 7th.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:6th round? You do know our starter is unproven and 27 even tho he doesnt have wear and tear on his body, and the backups are a converted QB and just another guy right?


RB in the 4th and wouldnt mind one in the 3rd, bring in a young talented 21, 22 year old to go with Toby


Its a pretty good RB class, the position is just devalued


Who is more unproven, Toby Gerhart or RB in the 4th round?
Reply

#7

Quote:Its a pretty good RB class, the position is just devalued 
I think it's a very deep class. There are a dozen day 3 prospects that I like. However, I don't like any of the top RBs. I would be quite disappointed with a day 2 RB...and a 4th round one even. 

 

I was also quite content with just Todman and Denard going into the year too, so if Gerhart doesn't work out or gets hurt I still feel like the position will be ok. 

Reply

#8

If Tre Mason is there in the 3rd, you take him.


Reply

#9

Quote:If Tre Mason is there in the 3rd, you take him.
Why? You'll be passing on a better player to take him. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Quote:Why? You'll be passing on a better player to take him. 
 

Nope

Reply

#11

I don't really feel like we HAVE to take a RB at all. But if one falls and he is BAP you take him.
Reply

#12
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2014, 09:10 PM by badger.)

We could definitely use a playmaker at RB.  Tre Mason gives you that in spades imo

 

I wouldn't mind going Watkins/Bridgewater, ???, Mason.


Reply

#13

Quote:Sankey, seastrunk, or Mason..I'll take one of em.
Mason will probably go sooner than I would like, however I would love Seastrunk in the fourth. His speed on the outside matched with Toby hammering the rock through the line!!!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Watkins, QB, Mason??
Reply

#15
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2014, 09:13 PM by badger.)

Quote:Watkins, QB, Mason??
 

Looks good to me, depending on the QB


Reply

#16

Quote:Looks good to me, depending on the QB
Garropolo? Carr? Or naw?
Reply

#17

Quote:Garropolo? Carr? Or naw?
 

Id rather have McCarron than either of those.

 

Bortles, McCarron, then Carr

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:Id rather have McCarron than either of those.


Bortles, McCarron, then Carr
McCarron is weird one for me. I don't like him but I don't know why. I like Murray better.
Reply

#19

Quote:Id rather have McCarron than either of those.

 

Bortles, McCarron, then Carr
Quote:Id rather have McCarron than either of those.

 

Bortles, McCarron, then Carr
Very unlikley we would get Carr witout a trade involved. 3 is too early, 39 will be too late.
Reply

#20

Quote:Very unlikley we would get Carr witout a trade involved. 3 is too early, 39 will be too late.
Should read without, hate my tablet
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!