Please explain how the Texans "didn't want Clowney" when weeks ago they came out and said they already know who they want to pick and it's going to take a lot to move them out of that spot..  that isn't a "botch", they simply stuck to their guns. I mean it's not like they didn't have their pick of the litter.

 

I mean, Did they allow themselves to get jumped or did they simply have zero interest in him like I did?

 

It's not like they weren't willing to trade up to take a player that they were interested in... since they did exactly that in the next round... so it's not like they weren't willing to pull the trigger if they really wanted him

 

there wasn't any drop off between Teddy and QBs taken as late as the 6th round.  Kudos to Houston and the other NFL teams for recognizing that.

 

 

I read that on your own team's message board by more than a few Texans fans. They claimed that the Texans brass tried to get too cute with the trade demands and botched the whole thing. They claimed trading the #1 pick was the intention but were forced to take Clowney when they messed it up. 

 

LOL @ the rationalization for the QB, too....

 

When Teddy is at worst, a top 10 QB in this league, you'll be eating your words. 

---

My understanding was the Texans said,this is what we want for the first pick. If you dont want to pony up? Forget it and we'll take Clowney......because thats what he's worth.

 

  Are the Texans going to the SB next year? I would have to say no. Are they going in the right direction with BoB? Absolutely!!!

I love this draft!!! We didnt reach and got REAL value through the first four picks. Best draft in Texans History by far.

---

Please explain how the Texans "didn't want Clowney" when weeks ago they came out and said they already know who they want to pick and it's going to take a lot to move them out of that spot..  that isn't a "botch", they simply stuck to their guns. I mean it's not like they didn't have their pick of the litter.

 

I mean, Did they allow themselves to get jumped or did they simply have zero interest in him like I did?

 

It's not like they weren't willing to trade up to take a player that they were interested in... since they did exactly that in the next round... so it's not like they weren't willing to pull the trigger if they really wanted him

 

there wasn't any drop off between Teddy and QBs taken as late as the 6th round.  Kudos to Houston and the other NFL teams for recognizing that.

 

So you think Tom Savage is as good as Teddy Bridgewater? Good luck with that. 

---

Colts: F

Titans: F

Texans: F

Jags: A+

 

AM I RIGHT jungle.jaguars.com??????????

 

Reading is fundamental.

 

If you read this very thread, you'd see Jaguars fans gave Houston much credit for their draft, and Tennessee too.

 

If you, I dunno, read websites like Cnnsi, sporting news, yahoo sports, nfl.com, you's see they liked the Jaguars' draft too.

 

So no, you AREN'T right.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

If I understand correctly, the Texans front office understood that Clowney was the best talent in this draft, but because he wasn't a perfect fit in Romeos defense, they where willing to trade the rights to draft him if offered an ample amount of picks to offset his value. If not, drafting him is still quite a consolation prize.


That being said, I don't believe Bridgewater was ever targeted by the Texans (just the fans really) so Minnesota didn't steal him from us. However, Garoppolo was our target and new England took him before us to force our hand in trading 4 and 5 for Mallet. Instead, O'Brien basically said FU and drafted New Englands tight end target Fiederowics. In addition, instead of trading for Mallet, O'Brien continued to say FU by trading the 4 and 5 instead to move back up for Nix, effectively leaving New England with 3 QB's in the roster, and Houston without the draft picks to trade.

---

If I understand correctly, the Texans front office understood that Clowney was the best talent in this draft, but because he wasn't a perfect fit in Romeos defense, they where willing to trade the rights to draft him if offered an ample amount of picks to offset his value. If not, drafting him is still quite a consolation prize.


That being said, I don't believe Bridgewater was ever targeted by the Texans (just the fans really) so Minnesota didn't steal him from us. However, Garoppolo was our target and new England took him before us to force our hand in trading 4 and 5 for Mallet. Instead, O'Brien basically said FU and drafted New Englands tight end target Fiederowics. In addition, instead of trading for Mallet, O'Brien continued to say FU by trading the 4 and 5 instead to move back up for Nix, effectively leaving New England with 3 QB's in the roster, and Houston without the draft picks to trade.

Initially I thought Clowney was not a good fit in the 3-4 scheme.

 

Then I remembered Romeo Crennel is your defensive coordinator.

 

I remembered Crennel coached the Patriots when they were winning Super Bowls.

 

I remembered when the Patriots were winning Super Bowls, they had former college defensive linemen manning the LB spots (Bruschi, McGinest, Vrabel)/

 

Clowney's athleticism surpasses all of those guys.

 

It would be a waste to ever drop Clowney into coverage, but I think Crennel can make Clowney work in a 3-4.

 

I type this through clenched teeth, but Houston had a great draft, too.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

I read that on your own team's message board by more than a few Texans fans. They claimed that the Texans brass tried to get too cute with the trade demands and botched the whole thing. They claimed trading the #1 pick was the intention but were forced to take Clowney when they messed it up. 

 

LOL @ the rationalization for the QB, too....

 

When Teddy is at worst, a top 10 QB in this league, you'll be eating your words. 

 

So let me get this straight...

 

You now freely admit that your sources come from yahoos that post on the internet message boards.  And we wonder why you post some of the stuff that you do here.

 

Was Houston open to trading the pick.. yes, but they were also happy and content with taking Clowney.  They fielded offers to move down (did their due diligence), but only at the "right price" would they move down.  They weren't forced to do anything and already made up their minds who they were willing to take. Hence why the asking price was so high.    TMD acts like a gun was forced against Houston's head and they were forced to draft Clowney.. he's a moron.  If Houston was so desperate to get out of that pick they simply could of lowered their asking price and got out of it.. they've been in talks with teams for weeks.  The fact that they kept the asking price so high just shows how much they valued the player they took over what other teams were willing to offer.

---

Reading is fundamental.

 

If you read this very thread, you'd see Jaguars fans gave Houston much credit for their draft, and Tennessee too.

 

If you, I dunno, read websites like Cnnsi, sporting news, yahoo sports, nfl.com, you's see they liked the Jaguars' draft too.

 

So no, you AREN'T right.

 

It was a joke.

 

You know, humor.

 

Haha? Lol? Rofl?

 

Jags fans always looking for a fight, it's hilarious.

---

Initially I thought Clowney was not a good fit in the 3-4 scheme.

 

Then I remembered Romeo Crennel is your defensive coordinator.

 

I remembered Crennel coached the Patriots when they were winning Super Bowls.

 

I remembered when the Patriots were winning Super Bowls, they had former college defensive linemen manning the LB spots (Bruschi, McGinest, Vrabel)/

 

Clowney's athleticism surpasses all of those guys.

 

It would be a waste to ever drop Clowney into coverage, but I think Crennel can make Clowney work in a 3-4.

 

I type this through clenched teeth, but Houston had a great draft, too.

Hopefully the bad Romeo Crennel who "lead" the talent stacked Chiefs to 1st overall pick will show up in Houston and ruin Clowney (it's a shame Clowney will get all the blame for it though).

---

Jags A+ 

 

Titans A-

 

Colts C

 

Texans C

-Clowney is an incredible athlete without a doubt.  However, he will be plagued with injuries throughout his career.  

Should he make it through camp I don't see him playing more than 6-8 games.  

-Passing on Bridgewater was a bad move.

-Will Cushing find a new estrogen blocker?

---

Jags A+ 

 

Titans A-

 

Colts C

 

Texans C

-Clowney is an incredible athlete without a doubt.  However, he will be plagued with injuries throughout his career.  

Should he make it through camp I don't see him playing more than 6-8 games.  

-Passing on Bridgewater was a bad move.

-Will Cushing find a new estrogen blocker?

 

I don't think they "passed on Bridgewater" as much as they tried to get too cute assuming he would drop to them at #33.

 

Cushing is done and was never even that good to begin with without the roids.

 

Where do you get the assumption Clowney will be plagued with injuries?

---

I don't think they "passed on Bridgewater" as much as they tried to get too cute assuming he would drop to them at #33.

 

Cushing is done and was never even that good to begin with without the roids.

 

Where do you get the assumption Clowney will be plagued with injuries?

Reports hurt/injured since as far back as high school.  True or not I certainly have no idea. 

 

Body size and position combined with a history of underachieving in regards to training.  Houston is bringing in a buddy hire (SC) with Fitzgerald which may workout for him but I just don't see it.  His body movement is also unhinged in a way that will make him much more susceptible to injury when challenged by NFL competition.  All those nagging issues IMHO will really begin to show early and if not he will prove to have been a great pick...we will see.

---

So you think Tom Savage is as good as Teddy Bridgewater? Good luck with that. 

 

I think that he thinks (gasp), that Savage is better than Teddy.....lol

---

It was a joke.

 

You know, humor.

 

Haha? Lol? Rofl?

 

Jags fans always looking for a fight, it's hilarious.

 

You wanna step outside....?  

---

So let me get this straight...

 

You now freely admit that your sources come from yahoos that post on the internet message boards.  And we wonder why you post some of the stuff that you do here.

 

Was Houston open to trading the pick.. yes, but they were also happy and content with taking Clowney.  They fielded offers to move down (did their due diligence), but only at the "right price" would they move down.  They weren't forced to do anything and already made up their minds who they were willing to take. Hence why the asking price was so high.    TMD acts like a gun was forced against Houston's head and they were forced to draft Clowney.. he's a moron.  If Houston was so desperate to get out of that pick they simply could of lowered their asking price and got out of it.. they've been in talks with teams for weeks.  The fact that they kept the asking price so high just shows how much they valued the player they took over what other teams were willing to offer.

 

Yeah, but I was citing YOUR yahoos. lol. Fellow Texan fans....

 

By the way, lol "we"??....You aren't included in "we" here. YOU Texan fan, are an outsider.

---

clowney will be Vernon gholston 2.0

CJ f, is going to be a nice player but the Texans needed a QB and playmakers.

 

in my opinion, the Vikings definitely stole teddy. There is a reason they jumped the Texans to take him.

 

Texans draft was poorly executed. Still came away with decent players. Nix was a huge get. B- only because of the clowney hype. Otherwise id give it a C+.

 

titans played it pretty safe and smart. They need a lot of pieces and they're not trying to do too much at once. Getting mettenberger that late (when people feel like he could be a franchise guy) was what really did it for them. I'd say right now B.

 

the colts draft was just not very good. 5 picks doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room. Moncrief was a good get and mewhort will be at the least, solid. The other three picks are all meh. I'd give a C- based on their "first round pick" performance, t rich. If richardson and another guy they traded for, aq Shipley come in this year and have good seasons though, that draft could easily change to a B+ or A-. I do think richardson will turn it around.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

You wanna step outside....?

 

Bring it on

---

If I understand correctly, the Texans front office understood that Clowney was the best talent in this draft, but because he wasn't a perfect fit in Romeos defense, they where willing to trade the rights to draft him if offered an ample amount of picks to offset his value. If not, drafting him is still quite a consolation prize.


That being said, I don't believe Bridgewater was ever targeted by the Texans (just the fans really) so Minnesota didn't steal him from us. However, Garoppolo was our target and new England took him before us to force our hand in trading 4 and 5 for Mallet. Instead, O'Brien basically said FU and drafted New Englands tight end target Fiederowics. In addition, instead of trading for Mallet, O'Brien continued to say FU by trading the 4 and 5 instead to move back up for Nix, effectively leaving New England with 3 QB's in the roster, and Houston without the draft picks to trade.

 

If your theory is true, O'Brien took a run-blocking tight end much earlier than projected just to settle a score with his former boss. That move would make him petty and insecure, in addition to inheriting Belicheat's lack of charisma. Can't wait for him to fail like everyone else from the Belicheat tree. 

---

"I am only an average man, but by George, I work harder at it than the average man." - Teddy Roosevelt

Colts: F

Titans: F

Texans: F

Jags: A+

 

AM I RIGHT jungle.jaguars.com??????????

 

This is pretty much the only time you've been right on this board.

---

Colts get a D-

It'd be a F, but I like the Moncrief pick. Richardson was a colossal waste. DC even took a shot at the Colts saying he can see teams still drafting RBs in the first if he's like an Adrian Peterson or Barry Sanders

---