I don't like Mincey either, just using him for reference. 

 

 

I love how people on this board twist things to suit their argument. I never said I liked Mincey, just that he's better than Branch and he is. It's kinda like how FBT was acting like I said getting production from Branch with good playcalling is a bad thing, clearly it's a good thing for the team but it doesn't make Branch good, and his production was still below average. 

It took Mincey 5 years to accumulate the sacks the sacks Branch has gotten in 2 years.

 

To put that in perspective, that's like saying a 5th grader who takes the same classes as you and gets the same grades sucks at school.

---

Andre Branch got 7 sacks his second year. He has earned a chance to prove it again this year.


The haters should just shut up with the lame excuse of "he only got them cause the scheme,etc etc" You don't think opposing team's knew the schemes we were running and planned for him? He just had the speed and quickness to make the plays. Why hate on the guy?

Well considering the source this is actually an upgrade from his typical I had a thought today posts.

---

It took Mincey 5 years to accumulate the sacks the sacks Branch has gotten in 2 years.

 

To put that in perspective, that's like saying a 5th grader who takes the same classes as you and gets the same grades sucks at school.

. Exactly. Swag do your self a favor and just admit your wrong. Will probably actually garner you some respect around here.

---

Can't admit to being wrong when I'm right. 

---

Andre Branch got 7 sacks his second year.  He has earned a chance to prove it again this year.

 

The haters should just shut up with the lame excuse of "he only got them cause the scheme,etc etc"   You don't think opposing team's knew the schemes we were running and planned for him?  He just had the speed and quickness to make the plays.  Why hate on the guy?

He got 5 sacks this year, he only has 6 career, I have been wrong about one thing, he didn't have 7 he had 6 career. 

---

It took Mincey 5 years to accumulate the sacks the sacks Branch has gotten in 2 years.

 

To put that in perspective, that's like saying a 5th grader who takes the same classes as you and gets the same grades sucks at school.

Mincey didn't play his first 2 years. Mincey got his first 7 sacks in his first 24 games aposed to Branch 6 sacks in 29. 

---

He got 5 sacks this year, he only has 6 career, I have been wrong about one thing, he didn't have 7 he had 6 career. 

He got 6 this past year and 7 career. You are still wrong.

http://www.nfl.com/player/andrebranch/2532801/profile

---

Mincey didn't play his first 2 years. Mincey got his first 7 sacks in his first 24 games aposed to Branch 6 sacks in 29. 

That makes Branch heads and shoulders above him right there.

---

That makes Branch heads and shoulders above him right there.

Can't tell if troll or dumb. 

---

Andre Branch got 7 sacks his second year.  He has earned a chance to prove it again this year.

 

The haters should just shut up with the lame excuse of "he only got them cause the scheme,etc etc"   You don't think opposing team's knew the schemes we were running and planned for him?  He just had the speed and quickness to make the plays.  Why hate on the guy?

Agreed

---

Agreed

You agree with false information? Because he never had 7 sacks in total, let alone last year. 

---

Branch is more talented than Mincey. SIgnificantly, too.

Agreed. Mincey was a great effort guy but didn't have anywhere near the essential athleticism Branch has. Hopefully the guy can continue the progress he showed last year and become a mainstay. He seems to have the work ethic at least.

---

I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you. 
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans.

Can't tell if troll or dumb. 

Troll? Are you serious? You are the idiot who's arguing and doesn't even know how many sacks Branch has.

 

5 seasons and off seasons of practice to get where Branch is in two years does not equal better. Branch is miles ahead of Mincey at this point in their careers.

 

That's not even debatable.

---

You agree with false information? Because he never had 7 sacks in total, let alone last year. 

False information? Pot meet kettle.

 

7 career sacks.

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/andrebranch/2532801/profile

---

False information? Pot meet kettle.

 

7 career sacks.

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/andrebranch/2532801/profile

 

 

 

Misread

---

Troll? Are you serious? You are the idiot who's arguing and doesn't even know how many sacks Branch has.

 

5 seasons and off seasons of practice to get where Branch is in two years does not equal better. Branch is miles ahead of Mincey at this point in their careers.

 

That's not even debatable.

Mincey had more sacks in less games.

 

Once again wrong.

---

 

 

That's a 6 right? That's straight from the link you posted.

You do realize that there is a column at the bottom of that very page that says Totals, right.

 

Under totals, it lists 7 sacks.

 

Dude, really?

 

Really?

 

You do know the difference between an annual total and a career total, right?

---

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 

What is 6 + 1 Swag?  You can use your fingers for this one. 

---

You do realize that there is a column at the bottom of that very page that says Totals, right.

 

Under totals, it lists 7 sacks.

 

Dude, really?

 

Really?

Yep you're right, now see I did make a mistake there.. but back to the original argument, Mincey had 7 in his first 24 games, Branch got 7 in 29.

 

 

My point is still valid although i'm sure as soon as FBT see's this he will jump all over it and try to make it seem like one small mistake means i'm wrong. 

---

What is 6 + 1 Swag?  You can use your fingers for this one. 

What's 29 - 24? The number of less games it took Minceys sorry [BLEEP] to get the same amount of sacks as Branch. 

---