The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Andre Branch: Double digit sacks
|
Quote:"Air" must wear number 79, and go by the nickname Brandon Brooks.Him falling over and barely touching his legs qualifies as a legitimate block in a 1 on 1 situation? No. These are grown men not children, a little brush on the leg isn't a block. Use common sense. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Yes, 18 yard losses are worthless for a defense....YOU'RE AN IDIOT TMD, I SAID THE PLAY WAS GOOD, BUT SAYING BRANCH IS A GOOD DE FOR RUNNING THROUGH AIR FOR THE SACK ISN'T IMPRESSIVE IS JASON HILL A GOOD WR BECAUSE OF THAT 70+ YARD BOMB HE CAUGHT FROM GABBERT WHEN THE COVERAGE GOT BLOWN? NO. WAS THAT A GREAT PLAY? YES. Do you have a brain? Try using it.
Quote:So I guess we should dismiss about half of Lawrence Taylor's sacks because they were speed rushes and nobody touched him.Are you suggesting Lawrence Taylor could not beat his man one on one?
Quote:YOU'RE AN IDIOT TMD, I SAID THE PLAY WAS GOOD, BUT SAYING BRANCH IS A GOOD DE FOR RUNNING THROUGH AIR FOR THE SACK ISN'T IMPRESSIVE If Jason Hill would have kept up those type of plays then yes. Just like when Andre Branch continues to get home to the QB, via stunts or otherwise, he'll also be viewed as good. See....thats how it works. Enjoyed the ZOMGALLCAPSZ though... ![]()
Quote:Are you suggesting Lawrence Taylor could not beat his man one on one? Are you suggesting Branch hasn't or never will? We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Are you suggesting Branch hasn't or never will?He has once or twice, the one against GB was nice.. please show me more. Bet you can't. He's awful against the run (just so you know, you have to play the run sometimes as a DE) maybe you forgot that. Not only is he not producing well in the passing game, he's one of the main reasons for our poor run d last year.
Quote:If Jason Hill would have kept up those type of plays then yes.Caps apparently are nessacary since I've said this like 5 times and you idiots haven't gotten it yet.
Quote:He has once or twice, the one against GB was nice.. please show me more. Bet you can't. He's awful against the run (just so you know, you have to play the run sometimes as a DE) maybe you forgot that. Not only is he not producing well in the passing game, he's one of the main reasons for our poor run d last year. So one piece of the front 7, an outside pass rusher at that, is one of the main reasons for the poor run D of last year?... I see...
Quote:Caps apparently are nessacary since I've said this like 5 times and you idiots haven't gotten it yet. All us idiots are getting the bigger picture here. Only one guy is trying to pigeon hole why Branch allegedly isn't that good.... We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:All us idiots are getting the bigger picture here. Only one guy is trying to pigeon hole why Branch allegedly isn't that good....Well if you don't believe me just wait until the season. I'd be utterly shocked if he gets more than 5 sacks.
I'm done with this thread, but if he gets more than 5 sacks this year i'll come back and eat my words.
Quote:I'm done with this thread, but if he gets more than 5 sacks this year i'll come back and eat my words. 5 sacks? You'll probably be eating your words by late October.
Quote:5 sacks? You'll probably be eating your words by late October.Are you trolling? You do realize he's the 3rd string LEO right? Behind Clemmons and Babin? If he gets 5 then he really will have turned it around. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Are you trolling? You do realize he's the 3rd string LEO right? Behind Clemmons and Babin? If he gets 5 then he really will have turned it around. Babin? really? Do you understand the career mileposts of either player? Babin will be lucky to make the final 53.
Quote:Babin? really? Why would Babin be lucky to make the final 53? He had a turn around very similar to Branch in the late part of last season and led the team in sacks. He isn't going anywhere.
LEONARD FOURNETTE FAN CLUB PRESIDENT. I WAS BEHIND HIM WHEN YOU ALL SAID HE WAS BRANDON JACOBS. QUIT HATING ON THE JAGUARS. GUS IS GONE. COUGHLIN HAS RESTORED ORDER. FOURNETTE IS FRED TAYLOR. DONT BELIEVE ME JUST WATCH.
Quote:Why would Babin be lucky to make the final 53? He had a turn around very similar to Branch in the late part of last season and led the team in sacks. He isn't going anywhere. You do realize Babin is 34, right? Branch is 24. Quote:YOU'RE AN IDIOT TMD, I SAID THE PLAY WAS GOOD, BUT SAYING BRANCH IS A GOOD DE FOR RUNNING THROUGH AIR FOR THE SACK ISN'T IMPRESSIVE This is truly funny stuff. The irony here is thick, like the skull of the person posting it. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Caps apparently are nessacary since I've said this like 5 times and you idiots haven't gotten it yet. Nessacary. And you're calling others idiots? Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Quote:Why would Babin be lucky to make the final 53? He had a turn around very similar to Branch in the late part of last season and led the team in sacks. He isn't going anywhere. I'm not sure if his job is 100% secure, but the team felt they needed to bring him back as an insurance policy, and as long as he's able to produce, and to mentor the younger players, I doubt there's a huge sense of urgency from the front office to dump him. The guy took a cut in salary to remain here. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Quote:I'm done with this thread, but if he gets more than 5 sacks this year i'll come back and eat my words. Wise choice waiving the white flag. Prepare to chow down. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.