TMD I have no problem with you and your opinions and you know this by now. However, the way you go about preaching said opinion does set you up for being called out like this.


Anywho, I still don't want Stephen Hill here.

---

TMD has just been made an utter laughing stock recently. If he had half a brain he would be embarrassed.

He's got a big brain.  Just ask him. 

 

That's why we should pursue an underachieving receiver of his choosing.  If the team doesn't, he can use that as a "They should listen to me and they'd be a perennial title team" schtick until such time as the player flops.  If he has marginal success, you'll never hear the end of it.  If he flops, you'll never hear about it again.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

If you actually gave an opinion on something in the beginning, it'd be easier to find those attached to your name. 

 

You are the king of fence sitters covering all bases. 

Yes, because knee jerk opinions are always the best way to go.  Being patient and allowing something to progress before formulating an opinion is the silly way to do things. 

 

As far as fence sitters go, you've been impaled enough times by the fence post to be declared the queen.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Huh? didn't say you were. I actually don't recall your opinion.

However, since you are making such a big deal about my evolving opinion on Fisch, I'll be sure to keep an eye on your opinions in the future just so theres no flip flopping by you, since thats not allowed by you. You must keep the same opinion for life per your standards. 

Again, find where i accused you, or anyone, of flip flopping.

 

And thank you FBT for pulling up some references, classic.

 

TMD, this would be a good time to pull one of your classic, vanish from the thread manuevers.

---

He's got a big brain.  Just ask him. 

 

That's why we should pursue an underachieving receiver of his choosing.  If the team doesn't, he can use that as a "They should listen to me and they'd be a perennial title team" schtick until such time as the player flops.  If he has marginal success, you'll never hear the end of it.  If he flops, you'll never hear about it again.

 

i know the routine, its so embarrassing, and if he wants to constantly push agendas and derail threads, i have no problem calling him out. he is a the most hypocritical coward i have ever come across.

 

 hill was very intriguing when he originally came out. right now he might be worth a flyer if an injury occured or over someone like mike brown, but i would absolutely rather have ace or shorts on the field than hill right now.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

pretty much every thread you create is a back door attempt at trolling and/or pushing an agenda in the first place. so it pretty much shouldnt matter anyway.

 

ill sum it up like this. hill stinks. ace is better. you are pathetic.

 

You make posts that are only about me. My posts are about football. You can claim I have an agenda all you want....if so, its still a FOOTBALL agenda. And I relate my football opinions topically. 

 

 

 

Making posts that have zero to do with football and are only attacking the poster are against policy. And you do it all the time. 

 

 

You should be booted. 

---

Again, find where i accused you, or anyone, of flip flopping.

 

And thank you FBT for pulling up some references, classic.

 

TMD, this would be a good time to pull one of your classic, vanish from the thread manuevers.

He never disappears from threads!  How dare you say such things!

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

You make posts that are only about me. My posts are about football. You can claim I have an agenda all you want....if so, its still a FOOTBALL agenda. And I relate my football opinions topically. 

 

 

 

Making posts that have zero to do with football and are only attacking the poster are against policy. And you do it all the time. 

 

 

You should be booted. 

 

 

this post and the last one you made about me werent about football. WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

 

now add tattle tale to your resume of failure.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

I disagree. 

 

Questioning anything Jags, as well as bashing anything Jags are seen as one of the same around here. 

 

I've seen it with other posters in addition to myself. 

No it's not the same.

 

Stating your opinion is one thing, criticizing and condescending others and the organization who do not share your opinion is a completely different thing. Once you have taken it that far you take full ownership and responsibility for that opinion. You can no longer step back and disown the opinion it now becomes your belief and it represents you. You now become responsible for the backlash you have earned because you chose to take it too far.

 

If you aren't man enough to stand behind your convictions then you probably shouldn't present them as such. If you want to be treated as having an opinion, then present it as such. Quit pushing it further than stating an opinion, then you won't receive the backlash you get for taking it too far.

---

Well TMD, it's been fun.  I have to go now, I actually have a life outside of this board and can't continue the good times until 2 AM, as you undoubtedly will.  I'll try and catch up with you tomorrow.

---

Again, find where i accused you, or anyone, of flip flopping.

 

LOL, the "I didn't SAY that" routine....

 

Then pray tell why bring up my early skepticism on Fisch? It has nothing to do with the job Fisch and the passing game coaches are currently doing. I'm praising what I am seeing them do. So, any initial skepticism I had regarding them is irrelevant. 

---

i know the routine, its so embarrassing, and if he wants to constantly push agendas and derail threads, i have no problem calling him out. he is a the most hypocritical coward i have ever come across.

 

 hill was very intriguing when he originally came out. right now he might be worth a flyer if an injury occured or over someone like mike brown, but i would absolutely rather have ace or shorts on the field than hill right now.

 

Careful.  Mentioning Hill in this discussion qualifies as a football comment.  You've been accused of not posting football takes.

 

Hill is only intriguing if there's a roster spot available.  I wouldn't trade anything for his services.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

No it's not the same.

 

Stating your opinion is one thing, criticizing and condescending others and the organization who do not share your opinion is a completely different thing. Once you have taken it that far you take full ownership and responsibility for that opinion. You can no longer step back and disown the opinion it now becomes your belief and it represents you. You now become responsible for the backlash you have earned because you chose to take it too far.

 

If you aren't man enough to stand behind your convictions then you probably shouldn't present them as such. If you want to be treated as having an opinion, then present it as such. Quit pushing it further than stating an opinion, then you won't receive the backlash you get for taking it too far.

 

I've seen others offer legit "questioning" of Jags stuff and done so very politely and in intelligent wording, only to be bashed for their takes. 

---

Careful.  Mentioning Hill in this discussion qualifies as a football comment.  You've been accused of not posting football takes.

 

Hill is only intriguing if there's a roster spot available.  I wouldn't trade anything for his services.

 

strictly if he gets cut. i wouldnt trade anything for him. not even a 7th rounder. if it was the beginning of the offseason he would be more intriguing as a free agent.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

.

---

Make the Jags Great Again
Blake Bortles......YOU'RE FIRED!
Dave Caldwell.....YOU'RE FIRED!

Well TMD, it's been fun.  I have to go now, I actually have a life outside of this board and can't continue the good times until 2 AM, as you undoubtedly will.  I'll try and catch up with you tomorrow.

 

Nice shuck N jive on the way out. 

---

No it's not the same.

 

Stating your opinion is one thing, criticizing and condescending others and the organization who do not share your opinion is a completely different thing. Once you have taken it that far you take full ownership and responsibility for that opinion. You can no longer step back and disown the opinion it now becomes your belief and it represents you. You now become responsible for the backlash you have earned because you chose to take it too far.

 

If you aren't man enough to stand behind your convictions then you probably shouldn't present them as such. If you want to be treated as having an opinion, then present it as such. Quit pushing it further than stating an opinion, then you won't receive the backlash you get for taking it too far.

TMD is the queen of back stepping or side stepping issues where he's dug himself in so deeply. 

 

He's quick to label others but he thinks he's slippery enough to avoid the same thing for himself. 

 

The problem with TMD stating an opinion is he gets confused and thinks his viewpoint is indeed fact.  When it's proven to be wrong, suddenly he's preaching a different tune.  If someone else has a change of heart, he's the first one in there ripping them as flip floppers. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

TMD I have no problem with you and your opinions and you know this by now. However, the way you go about preaching said opinion does set you up for being called out like this.


Anywho, I still don't want Stephen Hill here.

 

And I have no problems with you as you don't dedicate massive post count that is 100% content bashing me. 

 

You're allowed to not want Stephen Hill here. I'm allowed to strongly argue for him being brought in. 

---

I've seen others offer legit "questioning" of Jags stuff and done so very politely and in intelligent wording, only to be bashed for their takes. 

And how many of those people continue forcing that opinion into unrelated threads, invent derogatory names for players and coaches, and make themselves a general nuisance regarding their rehashed opinion? I can think of only one person.

 

Then you have the gall to complain for having to reap what you sow. If you are going to insult and lash out at people on the internet, at least have the back bone to take responsibility for your actions.

---

And I have no problems with you as you don't dedicate massive post count that is 100% content bashing me. 

 

You're allowed to not want Stephen Hill here. I'm allowed to strongly argue for him being brought in. 

 

If Hill showed a better ability to hang onto the football I would be for bringing him in here if he's cut.  I don't see how him being in this offense is going to suddenly make him a good pass catcher.  I wouldn't be upset if he's brought here if cut because I'd trust in Caldwell for doing so.  However I don't see him panning out to what he was drafted to be.  

---