And both stunk...and had numbers in the 80's. 

 

 

Where did I guarantee that every player that wears a number in the 80s turns out good?

 

Oh thats right I didn't. 

 

All I showed was that ZERO WR that have worn numbers in the teens have panned out for us. 

 

I'd take the other option over the 0% option. 

 

Bad mojo on our team with the WR low numbers. 

---

And it's been shown to you time and time again multiple logical and common sense reasons why that's the case but you still want to stick to your superstition.  Which is fine, that's your choice.  But that doesn't mean we can't think it's crazy.

---

Where did I guarantee that every player that wears a number in the 80s turns out good?

 

Oh thats right I didn't. 

 

All I showed was that ZERO WR that have worn numbers in the teens have panned out for us. 

 

I'd take the other option over the 0% option. 

 

Bad mojo on our team with the WR low numbers. 

Your only guarantee is that anyone wearing numbers in the teens will suck.  You can't say the same thing about the receivers in the 80's because we've had 2 who were successful.  That really makes your point.  Awesome. 

 

Once again, one of the dumbest positions ever taken by any poster on this board, but not a shock coming from you.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

And it's been shown to you time and time again multiple logical and common sense reasons why that's the case but you still want to stick to your superstition.  Which is fine, that's your choice.  But that doesn't mean we can't think it's crazy.

Or idiotic. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Shorts has an established track record even if that includes an injury history. Hurns has looked terrific but he hasn't played a single down of regular season NFL football yet. Let him earn the accolades first.

---

I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you. 
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans.

Where did I guarantee that every player that wears a number in the 80s turns out good?

 

Oh thats right I didn't. 

 

All I showed was that ZERO WR that have worn numbers in the teens have panned out for us. 

 

I'd take the other option over the 0% option. 

 

Bad mojo on our team with the WR low numbers. 

 

Bad mojo with you and posting. More often than not, it's just stupid. 

 

You should stop, you don't want bad mojo against you. 

---

LOL. Away for three days and I come back to find the EXACT same tired-[BLEEP] agenda derailing yet another thread.  So lame. 

 

 

TMD  --   everyone knows how you feel about Shorts, and everyone is supremely tired of hearing it.  Stop. Please. 

 

You can quit the stupid stereotyping of the fan base while you're at it.  It's insulting. 

 

As I said before, how about you actually look at who's initially doing the derailing before opening your yap. Purple Haze initiated the Shorts talk in this thread. 

 

If someone asks me a question in a post or references my opinion, I will respond. Thats not me derailing anything. 

 

But I guess its a lot easier for folks like you to blame one person rather than 10-20, huh? 

 

I get it. 

---

As I said before, how about you actually look at who's initially doing the derailing before opening your yap. Purple Haze initiated the Shorts talk in this thread. 

 

If someone asks me a question in a post or references my opinion, I will respond. Thats not me derailing anything. 

 

But I guess its a lot easier for folks like you to blame one person rather than 10-20, huh? 

 

I get it. 

 

You were sitting on the edge of your seat praying for someone to mention Shorts so you could jump in.  Your schtick is predictable. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

The eye test: Allen Hurns, Jason Hill, Stephen Hill, Jarrett Dillard, Tandon Doss.  Is the order right TMD?

---

As I said before, how about you actually look at who's initially doing the derailing before opening your yap. Purple Haze initiated the Shorts talk in this thread. 

 

 

"But, but, but...  he started it!!!"

 

What are you a 5 year old???   C'mon dude.  You continued the idiocy (that we've heard a million times) for several pages.  You are just as much at fault as anyone. Let it go. 

 

Oh, and I'll "open my yap" anytime I please. Especially when you stereotype and insult a fanbase of which I am a member. So take take your condescending tone and stuff it. 

---

"But, but, but...  he started it!!!"

 

What are you a 5 year old???   C'mon dude.  You continued the idiocy (that we've heard a million times) for several pages.  You are just as much at fault as anyone. Let it go. 

 

Oh, and I'll "open my yap" anytime I please. Especially when you stereotype and insult a fanbase of which I am a member. So take take your condescending tone and stuff it. 

It's easy to insult the fan base when you're not really a member. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

"But, but, but...  he started it!!!"

 

What are you a 5 year old???   C'mon dude.  You continued the idiocy (that we've heard a million times) for several pages.  You are just as much at fault as anyone. Let it go. 

 

Oh, and I'll "open my yap" anytime I please. Especially when you stereotype and insult a fanbase of which I am a member. So take take your condescending tone and stuff it. 

 

So, if I start it, its my fault....

 

If someone else starts it and I respond, its my fault...

 

 

I see. 

---

So, if I start it, its my fault....

 

If someone else starts it and I respond, its my fault...

 

 

I see. 

And with that ladies and gents, the dog whimperer officially plays the victim card.

 

The circle of life. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

So, if I start it, its my fault....

 

If someone else starts it and I respond, its my fault...

 

 

I see. 

You obviously don't see.   I'm referring to stretching the derailment to 4+ pages and posting the same broken record a dozen times that we've already seen 800 times elsewhere on the board from you. (usually off topic)  How do you not get tired of repeating yourself? 

---

So, if I start it, its my fault....

 

If someone else starts it and I respond, its my fault...

 

 

I see. 

So clueless it's scary.

---

So clueless it's scary.

Yet not so much surprising. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Sooooooo.... This thread stayed on topic.

 

C'mon guys! Try getting along or atleast make sarcastic remarks at JW... those are way more fun to read than the ones bashing TMD

---

Cookie has quite the eye.  He can see the future before the rookies have played a single down.  Apparently it gets a little fuzzy when talking about the mos productive receiver on the roster over the past 2 years. 

 

Wait, you're okay with it if Hurns succeeds?  But the diva says we should be angry because he succeeds.  I'm confused. 

 

 

crazy, right? thats what happens when youre a real jaguars fan and not an eagles fan.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

So whats the argument? WR's with a number less than 20 historically have been bad?

 

lol I cant remember one that has been a worthy starter but doesn't mean there wont be.

 

Strange topic indeed.

---

So whats the argument? WR's with a number less than 20 historically have been bad?

 

lol I cant remember one that has been a worthy starter but doesn't mean there wont be.

 

Strange topic indeed.

Go check out that Jones cat on the falcons.

---