FBT never stipulated "recent". He implied that it hasn't happened. 

 

 

It took all of 2 seconds to disprove his assertion. 

Actually he didn't imply it hasn't happened. He implied it rarely happens.

 

3 out of almost 100 years kind of proves his point.

---

FBT never stipulated "recent". He implied that it hasn't happened. 

 

 

It took all of 2 seconds to disprove his assertion. 

 

When you have to dig back 15 - 20 years or more to cite an example, you're showing just how weak your argument is.  Anyone with half a brain would recognize that. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Actually he didn't imply it hasn't happened. He implied it rarely happens.

 

3 out of almost 100 years kind of proves his point.

 

THose 3 also happened within 15 years of each other. (and its not like they occurred pre superbowl era or something, so lets not act as if those examples are that far away)

 

See how suddenly you can skew anything to make it appear what you want??

 

The Fact is he implied it never happens. He never said recent. I provided 3 pretty solid cases to dispute him within seconds. 

 

There might be more, as well, those were just the first 3 off the top of my head. 

---

When you have to dig back 15 - 20 years or more to cite an example, you're showing just how weak your argument is.  Anyone with half a brain would recognize that. 

hes been proven wrong so much lately. his stupidity brought to the forefront. you would think he would just hang it up soon...

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

THose 3 also happened within 15 years of each other. If you took that sample size you could assert that it happens frequently (in streaks).

 

See how suddenly you can skew anything to make it appear what you want??

 

The Fact is he implied it never happens. He never said recent. I provided 3 pretty solid cases to dispute him within seconds. 

 

There might be more, as well, those were just the first 3 off the top of my head. 

 

embarrassing, TMD. embarrassing.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

hes been proven wrong so much lately. his stupidity brough to the forefront. you would think he would just hang it up soon...

If you're that stupid, you don't even realize it. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

THose 3 also happened within 15 years of each other. (and its not like they occurred pre superbowl era or something, so lets not act as if those examples are that far away)

 

See how suddenly you can skew anything to make it appear what you want??

 

The Fact is he implied it never happens. He never said recent. I provided 3 pretty solid cases to dispute him within seconds. 

 

There might be more, as well, those were just the first 3 off the top of my head. 

 

And all 3 of them happened at least 15 years ago or more.  That's your great retort?  Pathetic.  You're quickly becoming the Forrest Gump of the message board. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

embarrassing, TMD. embarrassing.

 

Yes, for him, given the examples he asked for (thinking there were none) and me providing 3 within seconds.

 

The only one thats embarrassing is you with the little "me too" mode above. 

---

FBT never stipulated "recent". He implied that it hasn't happened. 

 

 

It took all of 2 seconds to disprove his assertion. 

I never implied anything of the sort.  You say I have reading comprehension issues?  Check a mirror, Forrest. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Yes, for him, given the examples he asked for (thinking there were none) and me providing 3 within seconds.

 

The only one thats embarrassing is you with the little "me too" sack hanging.  

 

As I stated a few posts ago, when you're this stupid, you don't even realize it. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Yes, for him, given the examples he asked for (thinking there were none) and me providing 3 within seconds.

 

The only one thats embarrassing is you with the little "me too" mode above. 

 

the most recent example you gave was from 15 years ago. the NFL is a completely different product at this point. youre so wrong here its a joke. id laugh if your stupidity wasnt so painful to look at, like watching a car crash.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

And all 3 of them happened at least 15 years ago or more.  That's your great retort?  Pathetic.  You're quickly becoming the Forrest Gump of the message board. 

 

really? Lets review...

 

A smart GM would have seen that that was the highest his value was ever going to be going forward. 

 

Which indeed turned out to be the truth. 

 

The above quote is nonsense and tries to make it sound as if Mojo was like 25 or something, but not a surprise coming from you. (clueless) 

 

 

Yes, because smart GMs always trade star players away when they're in their prime. 

 

You see it all the time in the NFL. 

 

Remember when Adrian Peterson was traded?  How about Tom Brady or Peyton Manning?  Yeah, those were some brilliant GM moves trading LEGIT talent for draft picks. 

 

Are you saying MJD wasn't in the prime of his career coming off a rushing title?  Once again, your expertise when it comes to ignorance reigns supreme. 

 

 

Herschel Walker

 

Eric Dickerson

 

Marshall Faulk....

 

 

 

lol

 

Theres the progression. You stipulated nothing about "recent". You're just butt hurt because you made a hasty ignorant comment and were proven wrong within seconds. 

---

the most recent example you gave was from 15 years ago. the NFL is a completely different product at this point. youre so wrong here its a joke. id laugh if your stupidity wasnt so painful to look at, like watching a car crash.

 

He'll never get it. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

1987, 1988, 1999

 

Not many recent examples I guess.

 

Teams trading away superstars is rare...but it does happen...even within the modern salary cap era.

 

http://www.si.com/nfl/photos/2013/09/19/...rades-2000

 

Carry on...

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

really? Lets review...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theres the progression. You stipulated nothing about "recent". You're just butt hurt because you made a hasty ignorant comment and were proven wrong within seconds. 

 

You're saying I implied it never happened.  I never said anything of the sort, so your great defense here misses the point completely, which isn't shocking because we've now established the big brain claim you've made here is nothing more than more of your scattering of the bovine excrement. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Here are some others...

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/75819...-the-2000s

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Teams trading away superstars is rare...but it does happen...even within the modern salary cap era.

 

http://www.si.com/nfl/photos/2013/09/19/...rades-2000

 

Carry on...

 

Again, nobody is saying the trades don't happen.  Still, it's extremely rare that a team trades away a star player while he's in his prime. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

and a few others...

 

http://overthecap.com/looking-at-past-nf...ck-trades/

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Again, nobody is saying the trades don't happen.  Still, it's extremely rare that a team trades away a star player while he's in his prime. 

Agreed.

 

It is rare because teams typically don't want to trade away in their prime superstars.

 

I offered these examples because TMD offered his examples from the 1980s, and somebody (Shack Del Rio, IIRC) chided him for not citing anything more recent.

 

Just offering for discussion and analysis.  Not picking a side.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Again, nobody is saying the trades don't happen.  Still, it's extremely rare that a team trades away a star player while he's in his prime. 

 

I argued using your words and what YOU asked for. 

 

Spin all you want, the above sequence I provided shows all. 

 

And Bullseye provided yet a few more to add to the 3 I provided. 

 

You were wrong. Deal with it. 

---