Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mallett to the Texans


Quote:Whoa, hold your horses there, Mister.

 

Being paid like a franchise guy doesn't make someone a franchise guy.

 

Garrard was never a franchise guy but he got paid, too.
 

I didn't even bother to respond to him there. Its laughable he sees Andy Dalton as a "franchise level" QB. 

 

Andy Dalton without those weapons would be a Joe Bag O Donuts QB. 

 

Andy Dalton even WITH those weapons still has played like garbage in the playoffs. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:I didn't even bother to respond to him there. Its laughable he sees Andy Dalton as a "franchise level" QB. 

 

Andy Dalton without those weapons would be a Joe Bag O Donuts QB. 

 

Andy Dalton even WITH those weapons still has played like garbage in the playoffs. 
 

we already had this debate. you think andrew luck is a franchise guy but dalton isnt. the colts weapons might be just a little bit worse than the bengals. the bengals really dont have anything special outside of aj green and daltons play and stats crap on andrew luck.

 

so if luck is a franchise guy to you, then dalton is a franchise guy. regardless of your opinion, he is definitely a franchise qb and oddly enough, the entire bengals franchise also sees him that way.

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."
Reply


Quote:    Meh....here's one from Mallett thats even more impressive.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highl...rd-TD-pass
 

No, that's a good throw, but it definitely wasn't more impressive. Bortles hit his guy in stride 50 yards down the field without even needing to step into the throw, the Mallet throw was good, but wasn't as well placed. (WR coming toward the middle of the field, had to readjust back out toward the sideline)

Reply


I think something that's telling is that in 3 years he only got in once when the Pats usually have 2 or 3 games a year where its a blow out win where they could bring a capable back up in to take some snaps...
Reply


Quote:I think something that's telling is that in 3 years he only got in once when the Pats usually have 2 or 3 games a year where its a blow out win where they could bring a capable back up in to take some snaps...

 
 

 The only time anyone brings in the back up these days is due to injury.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Just when this thread couldn't get any more asinine...

 

...it does.

 

It's like Schrodinger's cat: dead.  Unless it's not.


"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply


Quote:"I don't know what happened to this guy but if forum posters were handed annual awards, I'd vote him Most Improved Poster of the Year! Kudos TMD, this is refreshing!!!"

 

- Jags32250
It sure was short lived...

Those were the glory days!!!


Reply


Quote:No, that's a good throw, but it definitely wasn't more impressive. Bortles hit his guy in stride 50 yards down the field without even needing to step into the throw, the Mallet throw was good, but wasn't as well placed. (WR coming toward the middle of the field, had to readjust back out toward the sideline)
 

 If we're looking at the same pass Bortles threw it 35 yards. Yawn....

Mallett threw the ball OVER 50 yards into the receivers hands while on the run.

Reply


Quote:No, not "hindsight". How can it be friggin "hindsight" if I never thought any of those QB were franchise level QB even prior to being drafted?? :wacko:

 

Claiming "hindsight" is so desperate and false. 
The argument FBT was making is all were viewed at one time as "franchise level QB" or they wouldn't have been drafted.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote: If we're looking at the same pass Bortles threw it 35 yards. Yawn....

Mallett threw the ball OVER 50 yards into the receivers hands while on the run.
 

We must not be looking at the same video clip.

 

Either way I look forward to a lot of years of texans fans anger at passing on our guy. :thumbsup:

Reply


Ryan Mallett's preseason.

 

14/26 (53.8%) 161 yards 6.2 YPA 1 TD 0 INT

 

Not a bad deal for the Texans, but anybody expecting him to be anything is going to be in for a rude awakening.


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply


Quote:Ryan Mallett's preseason.

 

14/26 (53.8%) 161 yards 6.2 YPA 1 TD 0 INT

 

Not a bad deal for the Texans, but anybody expecting him to be anything is going to be in for a rude awakening.
 

Compared to Garoppolo and Bortles:

 

Garoppolo: 46/79 (58.2%) 618 yards 5 TD 1 INT

 

Bortles: 32/51 (62.7%) 521 yards (10.2 YPA) 2 TD 0 INT.

Reply


Quote:We must not be looking at the same video clip.


Either way I look forward to a lot of years of texans fans anger at passing on our guy. :thumbsup:


Texans have messed up big time. You don't pass on franchise qb's.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Texans have messed up big time. You don't pass on franchise qb's.
How bout the Rams!?!  Their guy can't even crack the starting lineup.


Reply


Quote:Ryan Mallett's preseason.

 

14/26 (53.8%) 161 yards 6.2 YPA 1 TD 0 INT

 

Not a bad deal for the Texans, but anybody expecting him to be anything is going to be in for a rude awakening.
 

based totally on that, yes. 

 

Based on his impressive play in college, the last time he got an opportunity to be a full time starter, no. 

Reply


Quote:based totally on that, yes. 

 

Based on his impressive play in college, the last time he got an opportunity to be a full time starter, no. 
Not indicitive of success in the pros.


Reply


Quote:based totally on that, yes. 

 

Based on his impressive play in college, the last time he got an opportunity to be a full time starter, no. 
You do grasp the fact that the NFL is not college, right? 

 

The list of QBs who showed "impressive play in college" only to fall flat on their faces at the next level is a long, and distinguished list.  To add to the fuel here, not only did your man crush play miserably in the preseason, but Garoppolo played extremely well.  Much better than anyone anticipated, and because of that, the untested rookie is replacing a guy who has done nothing in the NFL, preseason or regular season to warrant all the love you give him.  

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


(This post was last modified: 09-04-2014, 07:38 PM by The Mad Dog.)

Quote:You do grasp the fact that the NFL is not college, right? 

 

The list of QBs who showed "impressive play in college" only to fall flat on their faces at the next level is a long, and distinguished list. 

 
 

Usually its the one's who's college game doesn't translate well to the NFL that fail. See Tebow. 

 

The QB that played more of a pro style in college and did so at a high level, usually translate well to the pro game. Mallett was making all kinds of NFL throws his last year of college. He's the classic dropback passer. 


Reply


Quote:Usually its the one's who's college game doesn't translate well to the NFL that fail. See Tebow. 

 

The QB that played more of a pro style in college and did so at a high level, usually translate well to the pro game. Mallett was making all kinds of NFL throws his last year of college. He's the classic dropback passer. 
 

Evidently, Mallet's game doesn't translate to the NFL.  Not even preseason NFL. 

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply


Quote:Texans have messed up big time. You don't pass on franchise qb's.
 There wasnt one available in this draft. Next year is way more promising.

A

Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!