The guy is an absolute stud. No one can argue different.

 
Yup. The guy is on pace to throw for 5,000+ yards and 45 touchdowns. It's time Jaguars fans quit being such babies and admit the Colts have a great franchise QB.

---

The guy is an absolute stud. No one can argue different.

 

well, they can, and are...but they look kinda ridiculous in doing so. 

---

Yup. The guy is on pace to throw for 5,000+ yards and 45 touchdowns. It's time Jaguars fans quit being such babies and admit the Colts have a great franchise QB.

I am not sure why a lot of them live in denial about Andrew Luck.


Not to mention I think Luck at this point in his career has more comeback and game winning drives than anyone at that age.


Sounds elite to me.


And the fact that he completely owns the Jags every time we play against the Colts, I would think they wake up.

---

No, no you won't. He's WELL on his way and you're not already.


You look pathetic, to be honest.


Also I find it hilarious: earlier you stated him "dinking & dunking to RBs & TEs", go check out TY Hilton's stat line. I know you love stats (when they benefit you).

To be fair with tys stat line, all of the deep balls to Hilton were really good adjustments by Hilton on bad throws, except the last TD, the throw was right on the money but there was double coverage.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

To be fair with tys stat line, all of the deep balls to Hilton were really good adjustments by Hilton on bad throws, except the last TD, the throw was right on the money but there was double coverage.

 

At least they attempt & complete deep throws.....

 

#dinkdunkslantcurlfischsticks

---

I am not sure why a lot of them live in denial about Andrew Luck.


Not to mention I think Luck at this point in his career has more comeback and game winning drives than anyone at that age.


Sounds elite to me.


And the fact that he completely owns the Jags every time we play against the Colts, I would think they wake up.

The jags are terrible. That isn't a good point at all. You can take all the stats aside.


When you watch luck play, and a majority of his passes are too high, behind the receiver, or being scooped off the ground and then you have a plethora of times that luck stares down a receiver and throws it into a defenders hands, only to be dropped, you can see with your own two eyes that he isn't "elite."


I think he is an above average QB with bad accuracies and bad decision making skills.


Great athlete, plays with passion, CAN make all the throws.


Hasn't gotten any better since he stepped foot in the NFL.


That's Andrew luck.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

At least they attempt & complete deep throws.....


#dinkdunkslantcurlfischsticks

I already agreed with you that I hate how fiscfisch runs our offense?

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

I already agreed with you that I hate how fiscfisch runs our offense?

 

I know....but really, its time to also agree with us about Luck....he's on pace for 45 TD and 5000 yards as well as a high  YPA now too, which was one of the things Luck wasn't having in previous years. 

 

Luck has arrived in the top 5. 

 

 

Oh, and he's now 26-12 with an overall roster thats not a lot much better than ours, IMO. 

---

 

When you watch luck play, and a majority of his passes are too high, behind the receiver, or being scooped off the ground and then you have a plethora of times that luck stares down a receiver and throws it into a defenders hands, only to be dropped, you can see with your own two eyes that he isn't "elite."

 
This, folks, is what we call confirmation bias.

---

Andrew Luck will go down as the greatest QB ever. Yes, better than Peyton Manning.  We could have had him with the #1 overall pick if we lost on purpose towards the end of that season..

---

Andrew Luck will go down as the greatest QB ever. Yes, better than Peyton Manning.  We could have had him with the #1 overall pick if we lost on purpose towards the end of that season..

 

Those meaningless wins towards the end of that season was more important, remember? They built momentum, or so we were told...

---

Andrew Luck will go down as the greatest QB ever. Yes, better than Peyton Manning.  We could have had him with the #1 overall pick if we lost on purpose towards the end of that season..

 

Nope. The Rams had two wins. The Jaguars had 5 and only won two games "towards the end of that season". But troll on...

---

TMD, don't feed that guy. He's the biggest troll this board has seen since Jungle Cat.

---

If we lost against the Colts twice and Bucs back in 2011. We would have our pro-ready, franchise QB.  Instead, we've drafted Gabbert and Bortles, who are non pro-ready, spread offense QBs who will never succeed in the NFL.  Busts.  Setting this franchis back another decade by drafting these experimental, hope amount to something in the NFL.

---

The jags are terrible. That isn't a good point at all. You can take all the stats aside.


When you watch luck play, and a majority of his passes are too high, behind the receiver, or being scooped off the ground and then you have a plethora of times that luck stares down a receiver and throws it into a defenders hands, only to be dropped, you can see with your own two eyes that he isn't "elite."


I think he is an above average QB with bad accuracies and bad decision making skills.


Great athlete, plays with passion, CAN make all the throws.


Hasn't gotten any better since he stepped foot in the NFL.


That's Andrew luck.

Lol his passes are too high.


Talk about grasping for straws.


No wonder Luck can't live up to the hype. Every one of his passes are critiqued to no end.


He is elite and he definitely is getting better. It's too bad you are too blind to see it.

---

If we lost against the Colts twice and Bucs back in 2011. We would have our pro-ready, franchise QB.  Instead, we've drafted Gabbert and Bortles, who are non pro-ready, spread offense QBs who will never succeed in the NFL.  Busts.  Setting this franchis back another decade by drafting these experimental, hope amount to something in the NFL.

 

had we lost to the Colts 2x and Bucs we would have Luck.....but if we had the same coaching, Luck may also have been a bust. 

 

(I also think/ hope) that Bortles won't be a bust)

---

Bortles isn't a bust. 

 

And while yes, had we lost to the Colts 2x and Bucs we would have Luck.....but if we had the same coaching, Luck may also have been a bust. 

We'll give it 3 years of Bortles, we'll anguish  for 3 losing season, then we'll decide bust or not.  Another setback for this franchise.

 

Luck transcends coaching.  He'd make our idiot OC Jed Fisch look like a genius.

---

TMD, don't feed that guy. He's the biggest troll this board has seen since Jungle Cat.

 

Is Jungle Cat still around????

---

 

If we lost against the Colts twice and Bucs back in 2011. We would have our pro-ready, franchise QB.  Instead, we've drafted Gabbert and Bortles, who are non pro-ready, spread offense QBs who will never succeed in the NFL.  Busts.  Setting this franchis back another decade by drafting these experimental, hope amount to something in the NFL.

 

It shocks me how this tool isn't banned yet. None of his little rants are productive and are almost always attempts to hijack the thread. At least TMD can be described as an informed antagonist. This guy, though, is a pathetic troll. Look at this post history.

---

If we lost against the Colts twice and Bucs back in 2011. We would have our pro-ready, franchise QB.  Instead, we've drafted Gabbert and Bortles, who are non pro-ready, spread offense QBs who will never succeed in the NFL.  Busts.  Setting this franchis back another decade by drafting these experimental, hope amount to something in the NFL.

 

---