As this thread is now over 700 replies, I'd like to point out post #2   :woot:

I didn't believe you either. I thought it would be like 3 pages or something.

---

At any point, in this ridiculously long thread, has a clots fan said WHY Luck is the best QB?

---

At any point, in this ridiculously long thread, has a clots fan said WHY Luck is the best QB?

 

 

BECAUSE HE IS!!! IDIOT!!! YOU ARE STUPID!!!!

---

Is this Colt fan seriously calling Andrew Luck the greatest QB of all time?


Seriously?

 

lol, it sure looks like he is.

 

With a statement like that, he has lost some serious credibility.

 

He is now officially in the clot-colored glasses wearing category.

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

At any point, in this ridiculously long thread, has a clots fan said WHY Luck is the best QB?

 

because some guy said so. 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

because some guy said so.

More than some guy. Way more NFL football knowledge than you or I currently have. Let me know when you build a SB champion.

---

At any point, in this ridiculously long thread, has a clots fan said WHY Luck is the best QB?

 

I've never said he was the best.

 

Go ahead, go back and read all my posts.

---

 

More than some guy. Way more NFL football knowledge than you or I currently have. Let me know when you build a SB champion.

 
So if that one guy says Andrew Luck is the best QB in 40 years, but other guys who have built Super Bowl champions say Peyton Manning is the best QB in the past 40 years, who is right?? They can't both be right.

---

 

I've never said he was the best.
 
Go ahead, go back and read all my posts.

So answer the question, then. Do you think Andrew Luck is the best QB of the past 40 years?

---

 


So answer the question, then. Do you think Andrew Luck is the best QB of the past 40 years?

 

Nope, and it's not even close.

 

He was getting killed in his 1st playoff game and needed a complete game giving away meltdown by KC to win it.

 

Pretty good-yeah

 

Best QB in the last 40 years- no way.

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

More than some guy. Way more NFL football knowledge than you or I currently have. Let me know when you build a SB champion.

 

so what you are saying is that any person who has ever built a superbowl winning team all have the exact same opinions on every player and he is right about every single one of his analyses? who was it again? 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

 

Nope, and it's not even close.
 
He was getting killed in his 1st playoff game and needed a complete game giving away meltdown by KC to win it.
 
Pretty good-yeah
 
Best QB in the last 40 years- no way.

 
Yeah, the answer is pretty obviously going to be no. I'm just confused as to why it's so hard for ColtsWarrior to say it him/herself.

---

 

 

Yeah, the answer is pretty obviously going to be no. I'm just confused as to why it's so hard for ColtsWarrior to say it him/herself.

 

do you remember who he was saying made that statement? i was interested in that.

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

As a Colts fan, I can would like to chime in and say that Luck is not the best young QB in the last 40 years. Let's not forget Marino, Elway, and  Roethlisberger who are definitely in the conversation, as well as Manning, and Matt Ryan (who had done really well his first 3 years). Cam Newton is also doing really well, but I would say slightly less than Luck.

 

But a good point to be made, is that it's relatively a short list before you would get to Luck, who is just 6 games into year three. This is a testament to how well he has been playing.

 

I don't think he's elite.....yet. I do think; however, that he is well on his way. But not there yet. It will be fun to watch.

---

so what you are saying is that any person who has ever built a superbowl winning team all have the exact same opinions on every player and he is right about every single one of his analyses? who was it again?

All I did was mention the article. And everyone got butt hurt. Honestly I already claimed I don't care where he is ranked. I am amused the need to put everything in some sort of ranked list. It's not just athletes it's everything. Dang they rank cities based on trivial issues.


Andrew Luck has returned Indy to its normal spot. A perennial contender. And actually it has very rarely missed the playoffs since 95. And that success started before Manning.

---

 

As a Colts fan, I can would like to chime in and say that Luck is not the best young QB in the last 40 years. Let's not forget Marino, Elway, and  Roethlisberger who are definitely in the conversation, as well as Manning, and Matt Ryan (who had done really well his first 3 years). Cam Newton is also doing really well, but I would say slightly less than Luck.
 
But a good point to be made, is that it's relatively a short list before you would get to Luck, who is just 6 games into year three. This is a testament to how well he has been playing.
 
I don't think he's elite.....yet. I do think; however, that he is well on his way. But not there yet. It will be fun to watch.

 
Thank you. I think most objective Jaguars fans would share this senetiment with you. I'm wondering why Ex-IndySouthsider hasn't responded to you saying:

"Why not take the word over a 3 time super bowl winning GM? Would seem they know a hell of a lot more about player development than you or I!"

---

All I did was mention the article. And everyone got butt hurt. Honestly I already claimed I don't care where he is ranked. I am amused the need to put everything in some sort of ranked list. It's not just athletes it's everything. Dang they rank cities based on trivial issues.


Andrew Luck has returned Indy to its normal spot. A perennial contender. And actually it has very rarely missed the playoffs since 95. And that success started before Manning.

 

i dont think anyone got butthurt, i think we all logically questioned what you said, we all disagreed and you kept touting that the super bowl building whoever knows more than all of us. who was it? i asked twice. 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

i dont think anyone got butthurt, i think we all logically questioned what you said, we all disagreed and you kept touting that the super bowl building whoever knows more than all of us. who was it? i asked twice. 

 

Was there ever a name?

 

Maybe it was one of those "anonymous sources" that I see mentioned a lot in stories.

 

There is no way to check the credentials of an anonymous source, unless he becomes known.

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

 

 

Yeah, the answer is pretty obviously going to be no. I'm just confused as to why it's so hard for ColtsWarrior to say it him/herself.

 

You have to understand, it's very hard for some people to admit that their HERO, whom they love and adore faithfully, isn't quite seen as the same kind of hero to others, as to them.

 

That's just tough on them.

 

It's just hard for them to grasp that fact.

---

I survived the Gus Bradley Error.

 

who was it? i asked twice.

Charlie Casserly (the guy who drafted David Carr #1 overall).


Bill Bellicheck on Casserly:
“Who’s been wrong more than Charley Casserly since he left the Redskins? His percentage is like a meteorologist."

"He has no relationship to this team. I’d say less than zero. Based on what? He’s never at a practice, never at a game.”


That is a 3 time Super Bowl winning head coach saying that. Who are we to call a 3 time Super Bowl winning head coach wrong? O_O.

---