Or Billick.

Or Flores and Switzer?

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Neither of them were doormats. 

 

Can we get an exact definition of "doormat" please, lol

---

Neither of them were doormats. 

But why?

 

Do you recall any post game pressers from either guy that resembles the Green/Mora/ Ditka level meltdowns?  If so, please post links.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

But they are playing Tennessee. 

 

It's not as if they will beat a contender if they beat the Tacks.

 

lol....okay......

 

There will always be an excuse. 

---

Huh??? Neither of those head coaches would sit back and accept losing without blowing up at some point. 

You have a Belicheck meltdown in a post game presser?

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Huh??? Neither of those head coaches would sit back and accept losing without blowing up at some point. 

 

Some people can actually control their emotions. I don't recall Joe Gibbs ever "blowing up". It is called being stoic and is actually an admirable trait.

---

lol....okay......

 

There will always be an excuse. 

Not an excuse.

 

Just a win over Tennessee is not conclusive of anything.

 

Had Scobee's last second FG not been blocked, Bradley, the guy you say tolerates losing, would have beaten Tennessee...twice.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Its funny seeing examples brought up that aren't even doormat head coaches above ^^^^ 

 

The only doormat/ players buddy/ let the inmates run the asylum head coaches that qualify would be Dungy and Carroll. 

---

You have a Belicheck meltdown in a post game presser?

 

No, but you visibly see him angry on the sidelines at least on occasion when things aren't going well. He'll get in players faces and show them he means business. 

 

Bradley has not done that here. 

---

Its funny seeing examples brought up that aren't even doormat head coaches above ^^^^ 

 

The only doormat/ players buddy/ let the inmates run the asylum head coaches that qualify would be Dungy and Carroll. 

So Barry Switzer was a disciplinarian?

 

Is this what you are really arguing?

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

Its funny seeing examples brought up that aren't even doormat head coaches above ^^^^ 

 

The only doormat/ players buddy/ let the inmates run the asylum head coaches that qualify would be Dungy and Carroll. 

 

How does Bradley "let the inmates run the asylum". You are so clueless when it comes to this team.

---

You said soft/players buddy coaches generally lose.  What I am taking that to mean is that you are equating soft players(Marks, Bryant, etc) and a buddy coach Bradley. 

 

What are you talking about??

 

 

I am not denying the above. 

 

Bottom line is soft/ players buddy coaches generally lose. 

---

“Motivation alone is not enough.  If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

 

Some people can actually control their emotions. I don't recall Joe Gibbs ever "blowing up". It is called being stoic and is actually an admirable trait.

 

Again, Gibbs may have not blown up in any press conferences (that I recall) but I do remember seeing him visibly angry at times during his games on the sidelines and chewing out players when necessary. AT least in the first tenure of his Redskins coaching. He seemed to be more laid back in his 2nd tenure with the Redskins and not surprisingly, lost. 

---

Again, Gibbs may have not blown up in any press conferences (that I recall) but I do remember seeing him visibly angry at times during his games on the sidelines and chewing out players when necessary. AT least in the first tenure of his Redskins coaching. He seemed to be more laid back in his 2nd tenure with the Redskins and not surprisingly, lost. 

 

Bradley has been "visibly angry at times during games" as well. So what the hell are you even talking about? But he doesn't conduct a press conference like a jerk Parcells wannabe, so he accepts losing? 

---

So Barry Switzer was a disciplinarian?

 

Is this what you are really arguing?

 

Barry Switzer barely even counts here. That Dallas case was rare. A trained monkey could have won with that Dallas team those first few years post Jimmy Johnson. He was not really a disciplinarian, but he also didn't come off as someone who tolerated losing either. He wasn't passive.  

---

So lemme ask you this: what happens if Houston loses to Tennessee this week? Does he pound the podium again?

---

“Motivation alone is not enough.  If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

 

Bradley has been "visibly angry at times during games" as well. So what the hell are you even talking about? But he doesn't conduct a press conference like a jerk Parcells wannabe, so he accepts losing? 

 

I don't see much of it. 

 

I see him standing there with his hands on his knees with the blank stare. 

 

....or clapping after yet another 3 & out or TD given up. 

---

No

---

You said soft/players buddy coaches generally lose.  What I am taking that to mean is that you are equating soft players(Marks, Bryant, etc) and a buddy coach Bradley. 

 

Yes....the words "soft"/ "Players buddy" were describing the coaches I was referring to, not the players. It shouldn't have been that difficult to decipher.

---

Thread fail, but I guess to one who must have the attention it works. Bradley controls jersey shores emotions better than chin squirt can control his. He is so in jersey shores head  it is hilarious. Got him flailing like the squirter did at his presser.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.