Yeah, that was a really dumb thing to say.


Luck gives the chance to win a championship the next 15 years (whether you want to accept the truth or not), Manning can only do it for the next 5.


Jealousy is not a good trait to have.

Manning plus multiple picks would have probably brought you a championship already.


I prefer Bottles over Luck over the long term, so not sure why the jealousy comment...

---

Manning plus multiple picks would have probably brought you a championship already.


I prefer Bottles over Luck over the long term, so not sure why the jealousy comment...

That is absolutely hilarious!

---

That is absolutely hilarious!

I'm sure it is. You lot are very defensive...miss manning??

---

Manning plus multiple picks would have probably brought you a championship already.


I prefer Bottles over Luck over the long term, so not sure why the jealousy comment...

 

I'm sure it is. You lot are very defensive...miss manning??

 

Preferring Bortles over Luck is your loss, not mine. And we would have lost a TON of pieces that we were able to re-sign/sign if we kept Manning. Would be a completely different team.

 

Also, not defensive at all just think it's hilarious how jealous some Jag fans get when it comes to the Colts. It's hilarious. It's even funnier when they try to deny it. 

---

Oh we were jealous when you had Manning. Now I think we can be better than you, probably as soon as next season...

---

Oh we were jealous when you had Manning. Now I think we can be better than you, probably as soon as next season...

 

 

 

Good luck with that!

---

Good luck with that!

Hey I reckon we can beat you in a few weeks time.

---

I'm just not stupid enough to consider Tom Brady a top 5 QB right now based on things he did years ago. Who are your top 5 WRs right now? Surely Andre Johnson and Larry Fitzgerald have to be in there. Who you leaving out? Dez Bryant? A.J. Green? Demayrius Thomas? Julio Jones?

Lol...

---

BUT BUT BUT!! THEY WERE GOOD IN THE PAST!!!!!1!1111!

Got me on Brady man do I look foolish

---

Got me on Brady man do I look foolish

 

You were. You were stating Brady was a better QB this season (at the time of that post). You were DEAD wrong. Luck was playing better than him. Not even close.

---

You were. You were stating Brady was a better QB this season (at the time of that post). You were DEAD wrong. Luck was playing better than him. Not even close.

The only ones who look wrong are the ones who were quick to judge one of the greatest of all time. I didn't say he played better in those 3 games. I said he was a top 5 qbqb.

---

The only ones who look wrong are the ones who were quick to judge one of the greatest of all time. I didn't say he played better in those 3 games. I said he was a top 5 qbqb.

 

If you were saying top 5 QB in the game based on career OF COURSE. Based on the play during THIS season? No (not at the time).

---

If you were saying top 5 QB in the game based on career OF COURSE. Based on the play during THIS season? No (not at the time).

I'm a level minded guy, I don't just decide a qb of Brady's calibre is not a top 5 qb off a couple of games.


Likewise I won't coconsider Fitzpatrick a top qb even if he lights it up for a couple of games.

---

I'm a level minded guy, I don't just decide a qb of Brady's calibre is not a top 5 qb off a couple of games.


Likewise I won't coconsider Fitzpatrick a top qb even if he lights it up for a couple of games.

 

If Fitzpatrick was putting up Luck type numbers the first 4 weeks while Brady was doing what he did the first 4 weeks, Fitzpatrick would be most definitely be playing better AT THAT TIME.

 

You're getting impossible to have conversation with. This isn't that hard to understand.

---

If Fitzpatrick was putting up Luck type numbers the first 4 weeks while Brady was doing what he did the first 4 weeks, Fitzpatrick would be most definitely be playing better AT THAT TIME.

 

You're getting impossible to have conversation with. This isn't that hard to understand.

You are wasting your time. He clearly doesn't want to acknowledge what you are trying to say.

---

If you were saying top 5 QB in the game based on career OF COURSE. Based on the play during THIS season? No (not at the time).

 

Um, "at the time" he most definitely is a top 5 QB. He started off slow, but over the past 4 weeks he's been on fire and playing like a top 5 QB. Do you have a different definition of "at the time" than I do?

---

Um, "at the time" he most definitely is a top 5 QB. He started off slow, but over the past 4 weeks he's been on fire and playing like a top 5 QB. Do you have a different definition of "at the time" than I do?

 

Either we have a misunderstanding or you lack football intelligence.

 

When I said "at the time" I WAS talking about the first ~4ish weeks (which is what I replied to). He was not playing like a top 5 QB AT THAT TIME. Probably not even top 10. Right now, he's obviously playing like a top 5 QB.

---

We had a misunderstanding. No need to be a pretentious [BLEEP].

---

We had a misunderstanding. No need to be a pretentious [BAD WORD REMOVED].

 

Uh, what?

 

Chill out

---

You are wasting your time. He clearly doesn't want to acknowledge what you are trying to say.

 

Because it is stupid. So Coltswarriors makes top 5 QB lists every couple of weeks apparently.

 

He was suggesting Luck was a top 5 QB right now and Brady wasn't and I said at the time It was stupid. I got told that I was stupid and  "living in the past". He should have just acknowledged at the time that Brady was still the better QB but Luck had played slightly better the previous 2 weeks...

 

But he didn't...He said I was "living in the past" for saying Brady was a top 5 QB

---