The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Gene Smith and his effect on the current regime.
|
Quote:So you're too young to have learned to read yet? That explains a lot.He's called me Tommy boy multiple times and he's also called me pre-pubescent. I bet I could beat him to a pulp. Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes. <div> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown. </div> We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:He's called me Tommy boy multiple times and he's also called me pre-pubescent. I bet I could beat him to a pulp. Nothing says maturity like threats of violence. Quote:Pinch me if I'm dreaming, but I could have swore some players take more than a year and a half to develop.NO NO NO!!! They should all be developed and producing at veteran levels in 30 days or less...90 days if they were injured during the first 30...After that the entire roster should be playing at pro bowl and future HOF levels... ![]()
Quote:He's called me Tommy boy multiple times and he's also called me pre-pubescent. I bet I could beat him to a pulp. You know, I actually agree with most of what you've said here (save the hyperbole). That said, stuff like this is why you're an insecure [BLEEP].
Quote:In all the things you said you the most important factor is 5-11 team. Are we trying to argue about the 5-11 team playing better than a current 1-10 team? They both suck lol. The question is are the Jags losing because the players aren't very good (yet), or are they losing because the coaching staff isn't even as good as the 2011 staff? Since you claim that the players need to develop, I asked, and still ask, for your opinion as to which players are not playing up to the level of their 2011 counterparts. I agree that the players still have a lot of room to develop, and I expect them to do so. I personally think they are already playing better than Gene's players and that the problem is the coaching staff. If you agree, then say so. If you disagree then tell us which players are dragging the team down. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:He's called me Tommy boy multiple times and he's also called me pre-pubescent. I bet I could beat him to a pulp. Lol nothing beats an internet tough guy
I think everyone who has ever said " I bet I can beat him to a pulp" on the internet used to get stuffed in lockers in high school.
This is almost too sad to watch,
Lol Tommy boy at it again.
<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Lol at Tommy Lol " I bet I can beat him to a pulp".... Oooooh scare me! |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.