So she wasn't consenting when she was on top of him?

 

Why did he take her to the bathroom?

---

Didn't the video tape somehow get erased?

 

Can a video be pulled from a cell phone after its been erased?  I would think it could. 

 

I mean if I knew my friend was being accused of rape, the first thing I do is delete the evidence.

---

Can a video be pulled from a cell phone after its been erased?  I would think it could. 

 

I mean if I knew my friend was being accused of rape, the first thing I do is delete the evidence.

I'm not sure, but I think I remember that the video never made it into the case because it had been deleted.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

I'm not sure, but I think I remember that the video never made it into the case because it had been deleted.

 

How convenient.

---

Let's not pretend that you can't give oral and still say no to letting them get to the goodie box. That's how some girls remain "virgins" and keep their boyfriends happy...


Agreeing to one sexual act doesn't mean consent to them all.

I didn't say it did. But then it gets extremely hard to prove. Was she a virgin? I'm just asking since you used that in your example.

---

Why did he take her to the bathroom?

If you actually read what Jameis said, you would know. A link was posted.

---

I hope her statement is made available. I would love to read that.

She probably changed it three times like before

---

You mean the guys video taping the incident, so he took her to the bathroom and who knows what happened there?


Or the scooter where her off nowhere near her place? What a gentleman.


If you had a daughter his age, would you be ok worth him taking her out? After all that he's done, beyond the accusations, I wouldn't.

 

Of course not, but those things don't make him a criminal either. Completely irrelevant to the investigation.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Of course not, but those things don't make him a criminal either. Completely irrelevant to the investigation.

 

How is that irrelevant?  I would say a video of the incident and how he treated her afterwards is very relevant.

---

If you actually read what Jameis said, you would know. A link was posted.

 

Yes because what he said happened in the bathroom is 100%.  I mean if something bad happened in that bathroom, why would he lie about it?

---

How is that irrelevant?  I would say a video of the incident and how he treated her afterwards is very relevant.

 

Do you have any idea how hook up culture works? How he treated her afterward is pretty normal for "Hit it and Split it" hook ups. And the video? Maybe he didn't want his junk on tape, he is pretty famous you know. Again, not criminal actions.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

You don't think she's going to sue him civilly or settle out of court after this happens? She's getting something eventually from him.

Of course she is, this was her intention al along. Hence one of the many reasons why it would not be beneficial for him to testify. I dont see how this is such a difficult issue to understand.

---

Yes because what he said happened in the bathroom is 100%.  I mean if something bad happened in that bathroom, why would he lie about it?

 

And yet, he said she said is all you have in this case. Except that she said keeps changing what she said and the Anti-Jameis crowd continues to defend it.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I didn't say it did. But then it gets extremely hard to prove. Was she a virgin? I'm just asking since you used that in your example.

Since she had sex with her boyfriend earlier in the day, I highly doubt she was a virgin. But I wasnt talking about her...I was just using that as an example.

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

Of course she is, this was her intention al along. Hence one of the many reasons why it would not be beneficial for him to testify. I dont see how this is such a difficult issue to understand.

 

And when it gets to civil court where only 51% is required to prove the case Jameis will lose because being male makes 49% of the case.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Didn't the video tape somehow get erased?

Not only erased but a whole new phone I thought....

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

Since she had sex with her boyfriend earlier in the day, I highly doubt she was a virgin. But I wasnt talking about her...I was just using that as an example.

 

And no one questions her character at all. Womyn rule!

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

And yet, he said she said is all you have in this case. Except that she said keeps changing what she said and the Anti-Jameis crowd continues to defend it.

 

I'm not saying he did it....where have I once said he did it?

 

I'm saying there are too many loose ends for your fan base to defend him until the end.  There is not just one girl who has said something that involved sex happened with Jameis but two.  

 

Again, there are many people that specialize in rape counseling that have said that women who have been raped change their story due to the trauma.  They'll forget things that happened and then remember them later.  JT Money will downplay the only 2 to 8% of rapes are false accusations that the professionals give because one person says its not true.

---

And no one questions her character at all. Womyn rule!

 

Wow....you hate women too?

---

Do you have any idea how hook up culture works? How he treated her afterward is pretty normal for "Hit it and Split it" hook ups. And the video? Maybe he didn't want his junk on tape, he is pretty famous you know. Again, not criminal actions.

But yall keep telling us that he was a nobody at the time of the incedent...that's why the police wouldn't cover for him, right?

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???