How many times have the Texans defeated the Colts with Luck under center?  1 time.  Luck is the better player.  

---

How many times have the Texans defeated the Colts with Luck under center? 1 time. Luck is the better player.

????


So every player on a winning team is better than on a losing team?


So Andy Dalton is better than Watt? And Foles is better than Luck?

---

????


So every player on a winning team is better than on a losing team?


So Andy Dalton is better than Watt? And Foles is better than Luck?

Luck and Watt play in the same division.  Even in Lucks rookie year the two teams split.   Quarterbacks simply have more of an impact on their teams success and playing quarterback is like 15 million times harder than playing DE and rushing the passer.  You really can't compare the two positions, but I would give head to head against two rival teams as some consideration.  

---

And Foles is better than Luck?

 

You probably think so.

 

Especially with your QB analysis...

---

You probably think so.


Especially with your QB analysis...

Lol you are a homer joke.


Luck is moving up my all important rankings but still way short of elite.


Maybe he reaches it next season? Either way he's not there no matter what you or ESPN think.


PS. We are all looking fwd to this weekend. Be great to see the excuses as your old great qb beats your new good qb

---

Oh and what's wrong with my QB rankings? Who's way off?


Luck better than Brady.

Wayne got years left.


Keep on writing more gold...

---

Oh and what's wrong with my QB rankings? Who's way off?


Luck better than Brady.

Wayne got years left.


Keep on writing more gold...

 

Never said Luck was better than Brady.

Wayne was playing great until he tore his triceps (and you even agreed at the time LOL!)

 

Keep on making things up... Looks like I struck a cord with your terrible QB analysis.

---

Lol you are a homer joke.


Luck is moving up my all important rankings but still way short of elite.


Maybe he reaches it next season? Either way he's not there no matter what you or ESPN think.


PS. We are all looking fwd to this weekend. Be great to see the excuses as your old great qb beats your new good qb

 

For the record, I don't expect the Colts to beat the Broncos. I never said we would.

 

Once again, you're making things up.

---

I'm ever so sorry for not having him in top 5 ... Top 6-7 how stupid of me.


Just reached my tether with smug homers. Think I'll sign up to the Colts site and argue with anyone who doesn't rate Senderrick Marks an elite DT

---

I'm ever so sorry for not having him in top 5 ... Top 6-7 how stupid of me.


Just reached my tether with smug homers. Think I'll sign up to the Colts site and argue with anyone who doesn't rate Senderrick Marks an elite DT

 

Then why state "he's not even in the top 5 at his position"? Is 6-7 really that much different?

 

You're incredibly transparent.

---

I'm comparing him to Watt who is clearly the best at his position...


That's the point of the thread. Stop being so precious.

---

I'm comparing him to Watt who is clearly the best at his position...


That's the point of the thread. Stop being so precious.

 

Um, what?

 

You literally said Luck wasn't in the top 5 in his position. Is 6-7 really bad to you?

 

You have become an expert at making up things. It's quite.... strange...

---

Um, what?


You literally said Luck wasn't in the top 5 in his position. Is 6-7 really bad to you?


You have become an expert at making up things. It's quite.... strange...

No 6-7 isn't bad. I haven't said Luck was ever bad.


Year 1 mediocre

Year 2 above average

Year 3 good


JJ Watt is elite and has been since early on.

---

Then why state "he's not even in the top 5 at his position"? Is 6-7 really that much different?

I would imagine it was because if he was 6th or 7th he is not top 5.

---

I would imagine it was because if he was 6th or 7th he is not top 5.

 

Genius, really you are.

 

But stating it simply "he's not even in the top 5 at his positions lolz!11!!111!!!" is trying to put him down like he's in the 20s. Why even mention it if you consider him to be 6 or 7?

 

It's not shocking he'd do this, it's actually expected from someone like lastonealive.

---

Genius, really you are.




But stating it simply "he's not even in the top 5 at his positions lolz!11!!111!!!" is trying to put him down like he's in the 20s. Why even mention it if you consider him to be 6 or 7?




It's not shocking he'd do this, it's actually expected from someone like lastonealive.

I suppose it's because people talk about him like he already is. So it's worth referencing that he's not.


The next 3 years are crucial for him to become an elite quarterback, and it's quite obvious to anyone who see's him that he has the ability, potential and brain to do that.

---

I suppose it's because people talk about him like he already is. So it's worth referencing that he's not.


The next 3 years are crucial for him to become an elite quarterback, and it's quite obvious to anyone who see's him that he has the ability, potential and brain to do that.

 

So saying he's a top 6 QB is much different than being a top 5?  :mellow:

---

So saying he's a top 6 QB is much different than being a top 5?

I would say it's because the top 5 are quite higher than him, especially the top 4.

That's not a knock on Luck as he is in year 3. But it's true.

---

I'm comparing him to Watt who is clearly the best at his position...


That's the point of the thread. Stop being so precious.

How can you compare two players who play different positions?  Aside that they are both physically gifted for the position they play, there is no comparison.  

---

Dumb thread gets dumber, i see.

---