No thanks. Coordinator with proven record of developing QBs, please. Not a running-back coach.

 

Next.

---

Can someone please tell me what the rank of Mike McCarthy's offense was when the Packers hired him as their HC? I forget.

---

I cant say if I like him or not.  Don't know anything about him

---

Can someone please tell me what the rank of Mike McCarthy's offense was when the Packers hired him as their HC? I forget.

His offense in SF was dead last but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story...

---

Making up

Evidence

Depending on

Information

Available

His offense in SF was dead last but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story...

His offenses in New Orleans were pretty consistently in the middle third of the league during his tenure there. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

His offenses in New Orleans were pretty consistently in the middle third of the league during his tenure there. 

It's all about the QB. Who was he working with in NO? He wasn't there when Brees was there.

---

Re: Roman:  I honestly don't know why they sign Kaepernick to a $17m/year contract and then change his game to take away his strength.  I know risk of injury is a concern but these coaches need to go with the talent that made the QBs playoff winners.

---

Oh lawd

---

Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.

It's not a definitive stat, no. Some of those teams (I think Arizona was the Emmit years?) didn't have good running backs. I'm thinking MIchael Pittman in TB? But seriously you're going to put the blame on the OC and say that the guy coaching that position responsible for those statistics is not at fault? Some of those were pretty atrocious.


2 rushing TDs all season long? Bottom three in yardage?


Oh wait...on second thought. I guess that makes him perfect for this team. Because that's been us the past couple of years.


I would think that a guy we're looking at for a promotion have had, you know, constant successful stints directing an offense. In this case, even the track record of the position he coached for is below average at best.

The Chiefs WRs had 0 tds all season. Is that the WR coach's fault?

---

IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS

First, Im very happy that someone posted a picture of Kirby

 

Second, I would like someone that does have a bit better record with QBs but if Kirby is who they believe is the man for the job then I hope they are right.

 

Third, I do like the idea of tricking eer getting him to come as RB coach and tell him he will be back up OC lol

---

:thanks: Extra Life 2016 is 11/05/16 :thanks:

Looks like Gus wants to emphasize the running game.  Kirby and Roman are run-first people, and I'm okay with that.  This offense doesn't need complexity, it needs to do things well, and a strong running game does a lot for an offense.  You can build a successful passing game off play-action.  You have better success in short yardage and goal line situations. You can grind out first downs, play in bad weather, compliment a good defense, keep a young QB upright, and help a young team build confidence by keeping the chains moving. 

---

Looks like Gus wants to emphasize the running game.  Kirby and Roman are run-first people, and I'm okay with that.  This offense doesn't need complexity, it needs to do things well, and a strong running game does a lot for an offense.  You can build a successful passing game off play-action.  You have better success in short yardage and goal line situations. You can grind out first downs, play in bad weather, compliment a good defense, keep a young QB upright, and help a young team build confidence by keeping the chains moving. 

 

no no Prisco says we cant do it this way

 

we have to pretend that Bortles is Tom Brady and build accordingly

---

Re: Roman:  I honestly don't know why they sign Kaepernick to a $17m/year contract and then change his game to take away his strength.  I know risk of injury is a concern but these coaches need to go with the talent that made the QBs playoff winners.

 

It's an Andy Dalton-type contract, they can cut him and won't be on the hook for a lot of guaranteed money.

---

Looks like Gus wants to emphasize the running game.  Kirby and Roman are run-first people, and I'm okay with that.  This offense doesn't need complexity, it needs to do things well, and a strong running game does a lot for an offense.  You can build a successful passing game off play-action.  You have better success in short yardage and goal line situations. You can grind out first downs, play in bad weather, compliment a good defense, keep a young QB upright, and help a young team build confidence by keeping the chains moving. 

 

How do you know Kirby is a run first coach?

---

Kirby may turn out to be an excellent OC; however, I would like the Jags to hire someone that has experience in the job. 

---

If you want someone who's available, you have to get someone who's been fired, or someone who's currently at a lower level.  

 

Anyone with experience has had successes and failures.  The more experience, the more successes and failures they've had.   If they haven't had successes and failures, they've never been a coach at all. 

---

Baltimore and Pittsburgh are great organizations and usually make great hires.

 

If Kirby indeed had an amazing interview with the Ravens, that could be a good sign.

---

Here's the deal.  We bring him in to interview as the OC.  We already know we're going Roman or Trestman.  While he's here we tell him that we really like him and offer him the RB Coaching Position but put some type of fancy title like Assistant OC and let him work with the RBs and reside as an understudy to the real OC. 

Minnesota wouldn't let him leave for a lateral move. They don't even have to let him leave to become a coordinator, but it's pretty standard etiquette (unless you're the Bucs) to let a guy go if he's being promoted. Calling him "assistant coodinator" or "assistant head coach" probably wouldn't be enough to overcome the fact that he's still a running backs coach at his new team.

 

Posted this on the other thread since his name was mentioned there, but since he now has his own thread, I'm going to post it here as well.

 

Kirby Wilson:

 

2002-2003 TB RB Coach - 27th rushing yards, tied for last in rush TDs

2004 - 2006 AZ - 22nd in yards, 11th in TDs; 32nd in yards, last in TD (2!!!!!)

07 - 2013 Steelers - 3rd in yards, 22nd in TDs; 23rd and 13th; 19th and 21st; 11th and 8th; 14th and 15th; 26th and 27th; 27th and 26th

2014 Vikings - 14th and 16th

 

 

L...E....L....

I think the real argument in Wilson's favor would be that he helped cobble together a solid running game with the dynamic duo of Jerick McKinnon and Mat Asiata. That's an impressive accomplishment by itself, made even more so by the Adrian Peterson situation casting a shadow over the running game.

---

He looks like he's done a good job and I'm not going to get ticked off if he gets hired, but I hope they do their do diligence here.

---

Looks like Gus wants to emphasize the running game.  Kirby and Roman are run-first people, and I'm okay with that.  This offense doesn't need complexity, it needs to do things well, and a strong running game does a lot for an offense.  You can build a successful passing game off play-action.  You have better success in short yardage and goal line situations. You can grind out first downs, play in bad weather, compliment a good defense, keep a young QB upright, and help a young team build confidence by keeping the chains moving. 

Just to compliment you, lets add winning time of possession :thumbsup:  

---