Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Jaguars expected to make a strong run at N. Suh

(This post was last modified: 03-05-2015, 12:21 PM by knarnn.)

Quote:I'm not sure how accurate the following information is. But according to MLive Lions beat writer Kyle Meinke, the Dolphins are now around $ 15 million under the salary cap. W/o saying, that amount is still eons from the Jaguars salary cap availability level:

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2015/03/dolphins_joins_list_of_possibl.html'>http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2015/03/dolphins_joins_list_of_possibl.html</a>


They've cleared more than $13 million in cap space in the past week by cutting guard Nate Garner, cornerback Cortland Finnegan and receivers Brian Hartline and Brandon Gibson. They still don't have a ton to spend -- in fact, they have less than the Lions -- but they're up to about $15 million after their recent moves.
If the report of Miami being a done deal is true, then this is definitely a head scratcher.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:I am sorry, but no thanks to Suh. Or Cobb for that matter. Do people really want to go back to the good ole days of cap hell? Because to sign a big free agent we'd be mortgaging the future for the present, and frankly this team isn't one player away.
But this is a pretty generous logical leap you are taking.

 

You are making the assumption that signing a big name free agent or two would put this team in cap hell.

 

It won't.

 

First off, the team is/will be mandated to spend up to 89% of the salary cap at least by next year.  Eventually the team will HAVE to spend cap money, whether you want to or not.

 

Secondly, the team is some SIXTY MILLION DOLLARS ($60,000,000) under the cap.  There is no way signing both Suh and Cobb (assuming a worst case scenario in your eyes) would eat up all of that cap space.

 

Furthermore, it's not as if this team has players currently on the roster that the team desperately needs to re-sign.  The current collective bargaining agreement precludes teams from re-signing players until they are in their fourth year.  Assuming we have hit on Joeckel, Cyprien, Gratz, Bortles, Robinson, Hurns, lee, et al, we won't need to re-sign the 2013 draft picks until next year at the earliest.  Prior to 2013, we have missed on so many draft choices, we have nobody we are really pressed to re-sign this year, anyway.

 

Finally, one of the reasons this team's golden age was under Coughlin is because this team spent liberally and often wisely in free agency.  It is safe to assume that without Leon Searcy, Jeff Lageman, Joel Smeenge, Keenan McCardell, etc., this team would not have reached two AFC Championship games.  The biggest danger to any team isn't necessarily reckless free agency spending.   It's the draft day failures that make the free agency spending necessary in the first place.

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply


Quote:If the report of Miami being a done deal is true, then this is definitely a head scratcher.
 

Agreed.  It doesn't add up.

 

While I believe there's a good chance contact has been made in one form or another involving Jimmy Sexton and the Dolphins ( as well as some other teams ),  I strongly believe a contract agreement isn't in place with Ndamukong Suh.


Reply


Quote:But this is a pretty generous logical leap you are taking.

 

You are making the assumption that signing a big name free agent or two would put this team in cap hell.

 

It won't.

 

First off, the team is/will be mandated to spend up to 89% of the salary cap at least by next year.  Eventually the team will HAVE to spend cap money, whether you want to or not.

 

Secondly, the team is some SIXTY MILLION DOLLARS ($60,000,000) under the cap.  There is no way signing both Suh and Cobb (assuming a worst case scenario in your eyes) would eat up all of that cap space.

 

Furthermore, it's not as if this team has players currently on the roster that the team desperately needs to re-sign.  The current collective bargaining agreement precludes teams from re-signing players until they are in their fourth year.  Assuming we have hit on Joeckel, Cyprien, Gratz, Bortles, Robinson, Hurns, lee, et al, we won't need to re-sign the 2013 draft picks until next year at the earliest.  Prior to 2013, we have missed on so many draft choices, we have nobody we are really pressed to re-sign this year, anyway.

 

Finally, one of the reasons this team's golden age was under Coughlin is because this team spent liberally and often wisely in free agency.  It is safe to assume that without Leon Searcy, Jeff Lageman, Joel Smeenge, Keenan McCardell, etc., this team would not have reached two AFC Championship games.  The biggest danger to any team isn't necessarily reckless free agency spending.   It's the draft day failures that make the free agency spending necessary in the first place.
 

 

 Great post,  Bullseye.  

 

 Looking at the situation from a Jaguars perspective,  it makes a great amount of sense to sign players with a proven track record,  are durable,  and are young enough to have many more high quality seasons ahead.   Especially,  players with good work ethics that one can feel comfortable that the commitment will remain when they sign a contract next week or in the weeks ahead.


Reply


Quote: Great post,  Bullseye.  

 

 Looking at the situation from a Jaguars perspective,  it makes a great amount of sense to sign players with a proven track record,  are durable,  and are young enough to have many more high quality seasons ahead.   Especially,  players with good work ethics that one can feel comfortable that the commitment will remain when they sign a contract next week or in the weeks ahead.
Thank you.

 

One last point.

 

Let's assume that spending on big name free agents puts this team in danger of the cap hell we saw in the early 2000s.

 

Would the results be any worse than what we have seen the past few years?

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Thank you.

 

One last point.

 

Let's assume that spending on big name free agents puts this team in danger of the cap hell we saw in the early 2000s.

 

Would the results be any worse than what we have seen the past few years?
 

   Even if by some very high unlikely chance the results were worse,  barring an 0-16 season,  the results being worse wouldn't be significant compared to the struggles the Jaguars have had in recent seasons.  

 

  The upside of signing FA's that can realistically provide a major jump in the standings and be part of a playoff formula the Jaguars team brass is looking to put together over the next few years,   is far greater than any downside.     The Jaguars can approach the next two FA classes with the mind set of being an expansion team.   It's a position a team doesn't want to get into but its a position that provides tremendous opportunities. 


Reply


Would much rather spend money while all these good players are out there this year, next year might not have as good a group when we have to spend it.


<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Reply


Looks like the Raiders are firing first lol

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...-next-week

 

GO JAGS!!


Let's Get Em!!!! Go Jags!
Reply


Quote:Looks like the Raiders are firing first lol

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...-next-week

 

GO JAGS!!
 

 The rumors have already been off the charts.  It's only going to increase in the coming days,  barring something unexpected. 

 

 The Raiders can afford to pay Ndamukong Suh.   But the California State Tax is going to raise the price of what they will have to pay to have a chance at signing Suh.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Raiders plan to meet with Ndamukong Suh next week

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...-next-week

 

Quote:Oakland also represents a schematic fit for Suh. Coach Jack Del Rio's four-man front would allow the four-time Pro Bowler to wreak continued havoc as a three-technique defensive tackle. Pairing Suh with phenomenal run-stopper Khalil Mack would turn this defense into a legitimate unit for 2015.

Reply


That's where I see him going. His style of play just fits the raiders, add in Mack and its a match made in heaven.
Reply


Yep that would be great. Keep him away from the Colts! I like Suh but we should stay away. We have other needs. Are you ready to pay him 20 million per year?


Reply


Oehser indicated last week on Dempsey's show that he didn't think the Jags would really target Suh early in free agency. He said he thought they'd have other higher priority targets to pursue.


It makes sense he'd be on Oakland's radar since they have the money and a good scheme for him. If the Jags decided to jump into that mix, it would make for an interesting bit of negotiation.


As long as he doesn't wind up with a division for when the dust settles, that's fine.
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote: The rumors have already been off the charts.  It's only going to increase in the coming days,  barring something unexpected. 

 

 The Raiders can afford to pay Ndamukong Suh.   But the California State Tax is going to raise the price of what they will have to pay to have a chance at signing Suh.
 

Taking my teal colored glasses off, is there a better fit for Suh than the Raiders?  He embodies the dirty mindset that the Raiders players have been known for since the 70's.

One of these years.............

Reply


Nah, it's a guarantee that he is going to Miami, remember?
Reply


Quote:Nah, it's a guarantee that he is going to Miami, remember?


#becausejaguars, right?
Reply


Raiders are gonna have to pony up a LOT to offset what he'd lose in state taxes.  What is Cali, like 13%?



“Motivation alone is not enough.  If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Jags should jump in the mix just for the sake of driving the price up for him.


Reply


Quote:Yep that would be great. Keep him away from the Colts! I like Suh but we should stay away. We have other needs. Are you ready to pay him 20 million per year?
 

This is more my thought, but a lot of people here are really against it.  I'd rather fix 5 or 6 positions and get some lineman than take a large chunk of our cash to one guy.  We have Sen'derrick and a decent defensive line.....I'm fine with filling other needs.  We have the draft for a lineman as well.

Reply


As long as he doesn't go to the colts
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!