Based on what?

 

Based on the fact that Monroe was widely regarded as a top 10 OLT heading into this season, thats what. 

 

Thats a premium position and a player that is still young. Sorry, but thats worth more than just a 4th & a 5th. 

---

Based on the fact that Monroe was widely regarded as a top 10 OLT heading into this season, thats what. 

 

Thats a premium position and a player that is still young. Sorry, but thats worth more than just a 4th & a 5th. 

 

It's quite obvious that he wasn't regarded as a top 10 LT.

I think his true value was that of a "decent LT" capable of helping a team in need.  Nobody saw Monroe as a franchise LT or a building block for the future. 

 

If they did, A) we would have gotten more for him, and B) we would have kept him or at least tried to keep him.

 

I think most people here will be surprised once he hits Free Agency.  He will find a job, sure, but he won't get some astronomical number as a "top 10 LT that is young" would get.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

I think we may be overrating our guys quite a bit.  Monroe was a pretty good LT, and had some stretches where he was VERY good for a while, but was inconsistent.

 

This year he regressed, and he seems to be doing just "OK" for Baltimore.

 

The value of a player is determined by a number of things, including the contract that he has.  A guy that's basically a 12-game rental will not be "worth" as much as the same player with 2 years left on his contract.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

EM has played himself out of a fat contract, he's been terrible this year.

Monroe restructured his contract w/B-More when he was initially traded... I don't remember the #s...


NH3...

---

"AZANE"

Monroe restructured his contract w/B-More when he was initially traded... I don't remember the #s...


NH3...

 

Oh, did he already sign a deal with them?  I wasn't aware of that fact.  I would love to see the #'s.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Monroe restructured his contract w/B-More when he was initially traded... I don't remember the #s...


NH3...

There was no restructuring done. The Jags just took the bulk of the cap hit to make the trade possible. The Ravens were up against the cap.

---

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

Caldwell knew what he was doing when he traded Monroe. His plan was to put Joeckel at his premium LT posotion and see if Pasztor could be our answer at the RT position by evaluating him throughout the remainder of the season. The stats proves that the OL has played much better since the trade...


NH3...

---

"AZANE"

LTs better than Monroe:

Whitworth, Duane Brown, Joe Thomas, Ryan Clady, Trent Williams, Joe Staley, Okung, Matt Kalil, Bushrod are all easily better than Monroe.  Then theres about another 10 players that are similar to Eugene Monroe.

 

Not saying he's a bad player, far from it.   He's a very solid LT and a good starter to have.  Plus he's relatively young.  But this whole "easily top 10 LT" is actually far from true.  Monroe when playing his best football, approaches the top 10 and squeeks in.  Then there's a few other players who, like Monroe, have a chance to be top 10 when playing well. 

 

Overall, Monroe has been inconsistent.  It's not like the guy has been a pro bowler or even an alternate in his 4 years in the NFL. 

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

 After this year when Monroe would have walked we get nothing. This way we get two draft choices...2 for 0 sounds like a good trade.

---

Baltimore's line has played horribly lately culminating in possibly their worst game of the season yesterday (as far as line play goes). Rice was held to a ridiculously low yardage total and it was because there was simply nowhere to run.


With Baltimore losing, they now sit at 3-5, which makes those 4th & 5th round picks that we received reside in the upper half of those particular rounds. Even if Balt finishes the rest of the season at a reasonable 4-4 record, those picks would still be in the upper half of those rounds.

So how the hell does this support you?


So they've gotten WORSE with him playing.


Maybe he just isn't that good and Caldwell got a GOOD deal for him.

---

 After this year when Monroe would have walked we get nothing. This way we get two draft choices...2 for 0 sounds like a good trade.

 

2014 - Tag him then go out and get Alex Mack © and a few good Guards. 

2015 - re-evaluate his talent when you have a year to gage his ability when he's not surrounded by the worst offensive line in the NFL

---

2014 - Tag him then go out and get Alex Mack © and a few good Guards. 

2015 - re-evaluate his talent when you have a year to gage his ability when he's not surrounded by the worst offensive line in the NFL

The tag for a LT is probably more than he is worth

---

2014 - Tag him then go out and get Alex Mack © and a few good Guards. 

2015 - re-evaluate his talent when you have a year to gage his ability when he's not surrounded by the worst offensive line in the NFL

 

Oh, so we're going to tag a LT and pay him a ton of money even though he's never even been an alternate to the pro bowl, but the Browns won't Franchise their young Pro-Bowl Center?

 

Hmm... That wouldn't even make sense in Madden.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Is OT really a premium position though? Or is it an outdated ideal like "Defense wins championships". We have two starting Gene Smith UDFA tackles that are arguably doing better than the top 10 draft pick tackles that they replaced.

---

Is OT really a premium position though? Or is it an outdated ideal like "Defense wins championships". We have two starting Gene Smith UDFA tackles that are arguably doing better than the top 10 draft pick tackles that they replaced.

 

good question. 

 

perhaps an average O-Line is all a good QB needs nowadays, especially with how pass happy the NFL has gotten.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

good question. 

 

perhaps an average O-Line is all a good QB needs nowadays, especially with how pass happy the NFL has gotten.

 

No

---

No

 

Brilliant insight, as always

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

good question. 

 

perhaps an average O-Line is all a good QB needs nowadays, especially with how pass happy the NFL has gotten.

 

Yes.  Problem with an O-Line is you can't trust it.  You can't expect to have a healthy O-Line in the NFL.  You need 5 healthy starters to have a good line, and one healthy pass rusher to blow it up.  Good QBs have to perform with bad lines. 

---

Based on the fact that Monroe was widely regarded as a top 10 OLT heading into this season, thats what. 

 

Thats a premium position and a player that is still young. Sorry, but thats worth more than just a 4th & a 5th. 

 

He's top-10 for the purpose of helping your argument for more draft picks, but you didn't believe that before the trade.

 

The 4th and 5th is a decent trade. 

---

Shhhhhh.. Don't tell anybody our former "elite" LT isn't playing so well.

---