You call em what you want, I'll call em what I want

Are you getting sensitive because you was corrected?

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Are you getting sensitive because you was corrected?

Corrected by your opinion? You by chance related to TMD?

---

Corrected by your opinion? You by chance related to TMD?

You actually believe animals such as birds, Tigers, deers, etc can set cars on fire?

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

You actually believe animals such as birds, Tigers, deers, etc can set cars on fire?

I'm even starting to think that JW isn't the only one with Aspergers..


Class is in session.. You know what a metaphor is, correct?

---

I'm even starting to think that JW isn't the only one with Aspergers..

Class is in session.. You know what a metaphor is, correct?

Your metaphor doesn't make sense in this case because as I stated previously a human can NOT drop to a intellectual level to where they can behave like a "animal".


A animal doesn't have the capability of looting stores, throwing rocks at the police, or setting cars on fire.


Criminal would be the appropriate and factual metaphor.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Your metaphor doesn't make sense in this case because as I stated previously a human can NOT drop to a intellectual level to where they can behave like a "animal".


A animal doesn't have the capability of looting stores, throwing rocks at the police, or setting cars on fire.


Criminal would be the appropriate and factual metaphor.

Whatever you say man. To me, they acted like lawless, uncivilized, anarchist animals that cared not about the subject at hand but their own gains.

---

Your metaphor doesn't make sense in this case because as I stated previously a human can NOT drop to a intellectual level to where they can behave like a "animal".


A animal doesn't have the capability of looting stores, throwing rocks at the police, or setting cars on fire.


Criminal would be the appropriate and factual metaphor.

What's the point of point of this argument? 

---

Whatever you say man. To me, they acted like lawless, uncivilized, anarchist animals that cared not about the subject at hand but their own gains.

And you have that right to share that opinion.


The fact is they are criminals who committed a crime.


Animals don't commit crimes.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

And you have that right to share that opinion.


The fact is they are criminals who committed a crime.


Animals don't commit crimes.

Thanks JW..

---

What's the point of point of this argument?

To establish humans can't act like a tiger, Monkey, or a lizard while committing crimes because it is impossible.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Thanks JW..

Very petty response.


I apologize if I struck a nerve or sensitive side with you.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

To establish humans can't act like a tiger, Monkey, or a lizard while committing crimes because it is impossible.

 

Pretty sure Charlie Sheen would find a way

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

Pretty sure Charlie Sheen would find a way

Now I'm stuck with that thought. Lol.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Very petty response.


I apologize if I struck a nerve or sensitive side with you.

Please, don't flatter yourself.. You can't strike my nerves

---

Please, don't flatter yourself.. You can't strike my nerves

Oh ok cool seems like you got unnecessarily defensive there for a second.


Thanks for the clarification.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Oh ok cool seems like you got unnecessarily defensive there for a second.


Thanks for the clarification.

It's all good duder..

---

To establish humans can't act like a tiger, Monkey, or a lizard while committing crimes because it is impossible.

Yeah but that's not why you are arguing with him. It's obvious you are offended by the term why be disingenuous and debate the definition of a word and pretend words are not used in ways other than their definition as a common practice in our language?

---

Yeah but that's not why you are arguing with him. It's obvious you are offended by the term why be disingenuous and debate the definition of a word and pretend words are not used in ways other than their definition as a common practice in our language?

Actually I didn't perceive him to use the word animals with a racial undertone because earlier in this thread I think the 5th response..he specifically stated he didn't care if the they were white or black they were acting like "animals". That's why I was curious in his reasoning for using such term when associating human behavior.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Actually I didn't perceive him to use the word animals with a racial undertone because earlier in this thread I think the 5th response..he specifically stated he didn't care if the they were white or black they were acting like "animals". That's why I was curious in his reasoning for using such term when associating human behavior.

My point remains. He already told you the manner in which he was using the word. It's a fairly common use of the word weather people like that use or not. 

---

Your metaphor doesn't make sense in this case because as I stated previously a human can NOT drop to a intellectual level to where they can behave like a "animal".


A animal doesn't have the capability of looting stores, throwing rocks at the police, or setting cars on fire.


Criminal would be the appropriate and factual metaphor.

An animal does not have the capability of reasonable thought.  No wait, a wild deer has learned that the scent of man means danger and avoids man.  By jove you are right, these scum sucking dirtwads committing these acts of violence are unable to reason the consequences of their actions.  They don't qualify to be animals.  

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.