The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Oregon at Stanford
|
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Teddy in round one and Trent Murphy in round two would make me a happy man. This raises a couple of questions I'd like to pose to the board as hypotheticals. 1. Suppose that somehow the Jaguars end up picking 4th overall-either through a trade down or somehow miraculously winning a few games the second half of this season. Assume Bridgewater, Clowney and Mariota are all off the board. Who do you take at 4? 2. Assume the Jaguars end up picking 2nd or 4th and miss out on their preferred QB and take a DE/LEO in the first round. Given the supposed depth of the QB crop this year, would you be willing to wait until the top of the 2nd round to pick the QB, or would you be willing to trade back up into the first round to ensure the Jaguars get that next tier passer? If you would trade up, who would be your target? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
Quote:This raises a couple of questions I'd like to pose to the board as hypotheticals. Plenty of other threads this can be discussed in. No reason to derail a game thread with draft hypothesis.
TEST
Don't see why anyone would want Murphy as a LEO when he's not all that fast and can't bend the edge like what you'd want a premier pass-rusher to do.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Don't see why anyone would want Murphy as a LEO when he's not all that fast and can't bend the edge like what you'd want a premier pass-rusher to do.9.5 sacks in 8 games probably has something to do with it. Quote:Don't see why anyone would want Murphy as a LEO when he's not all that fast and can't bend the edge like what you'd want a premier pass-rusher to do. He lives in the backfield, and he's consistently done it his entire career. I think he could be a very good player for us. He seems like a "Gus guy." Quote:Plenty of other threads this can be discussed in. No reason to derail a game thread with draft hypothesis. Have you read this thread?!? There are so many different subtopics/tangents, including draft talk, and you single me out for derailing the thread?!? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
Quote:He lives in the backfield, and he's consistently done it his entire career. I think he could be a very good player for us. He seems like a "Gus guy."Does he meet the other requirements? Dreads and juice We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Does he meet the other requirements? Dreads and juiceDreads no, juice yes. http://www.gostanford.com/ViewArticle.db...=208167737
Quote:Have you read this thread?!? Ignore the idiot. Somehow he thinks he's better than everyone else on here.
Quote:Have you read this thread?!? Iti s OK to talk about the players being watched by 50 NFL scouts as long as messages are not taken out of context.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:oregon by two tds.The who and the what?
Quote:Oregon by two TDs. If you want to talk about that game, feel free to start your own thread. I could not even remember who Baylor's opponent tonight is. How much is Oregon favored by? Quote:The who and the what? Lol pretty much, no local implications in OU Baylor so no one on here cares I would guess.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I'm stuck at work, I'm glad to see Stanford up 14-0.
Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.