The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
FBI admits no major cases cracked with Patriot Act snooping powers
|
FBI admits no major cases cracked with Patriot Act snooping powers FBI agents can’t point to any major terrorism cases they’ve cracked thanks to the key snooping powers in the Patriot Act, the Justice Department’s inspector general said in a report Thursday that could complicate efforts to keep key parts of the law operating Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015...z3arkogFxh ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Let's hope that congress and the senate doesn't see this and think "Wow! The PATRIOT Act hasn't accomplished anything? Guess we better broaden it's powers then."
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
Quote:Let's hope that congress and the senate doesn't see this and think "Wow! The PATRIOT Act hasn't accomplished anything? Guess we better broaden it's powers then." Or think...great!!, We are so good we scared them with our awesome power! We need to make it bigger!!
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Quote:Let's hope that congress and the senate doesn't see this and think "Wow! The PATRIOT Act hasn't accomplished anything? Guess we better broaden it's powers then." Quote:Or think...great!!, We are so good we scared them with our awesome power! We need to make it bigger!!Sigh.... Why do I get the feeling this is exactly what will happen. :yucky:
And literally all the 'small government' congressional republicans will vote to expand it's scope.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:And literally all the 'small government' congressional republicans will vote to expand it's scope. Just like all of the "more government" congressional democrats. There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Quote:And literally all the 'small government' congressional republicans will vote to expand it's scope. Quote:Just like all of the "more government" congressional democrats.Actually it seems their is bipartisan support in the house to reduce the scope. It's the senate that is having the problems I think.
The Freedom Act doesn't quite go far enough, but it's probably the best we can hope for right now.
What I want to know, is who is in charge of these acronyms? I'd love to have that job. Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping Dragnet-Collection and Online Monitoring
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
Quote:And literally all the 'small government' congressional republicans will vote to expand it's scope. Those who vote for it are not 'small government.' "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Actually it seems their is bipartisan support in the house to reduce the scope. It's the senate that is having the problems I think. Gee, I wonder what party has control of The Senate? :whistling: There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
The problem is they aren't spying enough, what we need to do is have everyone's house and office wired for sound and video. Those with nothing to hide should have nothing to worry about. Am I doing it right?
Quote:Gee, I wonder what party has control of The Senate? :whistling: The Republican Party has control of The Senate. ...And they're having trouble limiting the scope of the patriot act?
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
Quote:<div></div> Quote:The Republican Party has control of The Senate. ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Gee, I wonder what party has control of The Senate? :whistling:Yeah I am not sure what your point is here..... It seems you are trying to make this a partisan issue when people from all different viewpoints in here are in unanimous agreement of what we want to see happen. As pointed out by others the GOP controls the senate.... http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/...ity-leader
Quote:Let's hope that congress and the senate doesn't see this and think "Wow! The PATRIOT Act hasn't accomplished anything? Guess we better broaden it's powers then."Now you're thinking like a politician! Quote:And literally all the 'small government' congressional republicans will vote to expand it's scope.True small government republicans aren't supporting this. Just because some elected nitwit has an R after his name, that doesn't make him a small government guy. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Quote:Gee, I wonder what party has control of The Senate? :whistling:Look who is leading the Senate. The leadership in that house shares DNA with the likes of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. They're not conservatives. They're just a bunch of plutocrats who are more focused on keeping their positions of power than they are on dialing back governmental intrusion into our lives. There are a few people in the Senate who are there to beat this, but unfortunately not enough. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Look who is leading the Senate. The leadership in that house shares DNA with the likes of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. They're not conservatives. They're just a bunch of plutocrats who are more focused on keeping their positions of power than they are on dialing back governmental intrusion into our lives. There are a few people in the Senate who are there to beat this, but unfortunately not enough. No true Scotsman.
Quote:Look who is leading the Senate. The leadership in that house shares DNA with the likes of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. They're not conservatives. They're just a bunch of plutocrats who are more focused on keeping their positions of power than they are on dialing back governmental intrusion into our lives. There are a few people in the Senate who are there to beat this, but unfortunately not enough. Exactly my point. It's "the establishment" types. There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Ron Paul was right but nobody wanted to hear it 10 years ago. Good luck getting the Feds to give that power up.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.