Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Supreme Court rules states must allow same-sex marriage


Quote:Well, Cruz's parents weren't anti-American radicals either. Put the two together, along with Obama's refusal to release the normal background documents expected of a candidate, and it does have an unseemly appearance from the outside.
 

Anti-American radicals? So you're drinking that Kool-Aid, too?

 

Obama posted a copy of his birth certificate on the internet in 2008.

 

If you want to believe something, it's easy to take a few prejudiced suspicions and mold them into "facts."

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:I don't think anyone who was hired before this decision should be fired or quit because they don't agree morally/religiously. They should be grandfathered in as they were hired prior to a job description they have this issue with. If people want to quit or are fired just because they are generally opposed to gays/gay marriage is a different story.
 

How do you make the distinction between "generally opposed" and "don't agree morally/religiously"?

 

If a person doesn't want to do their job, they should be free to quit. I wonder how many of those serving on the morality police force had similar reservations over issuing marriage licenses to, say, potential spousal abusers.

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply


Quote:How do you make the distinction between "generally opposed" and "don't agree morally/religiously"?

 

If a person doesn't want to do their job, they should be free to quit. I wonder how many of those serving on the morality police force had similar reservations over issuing marriage licenses to, say, potential spousal abusers.



Or adulterers, or to divorced people...both big no no's too.
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply


Quote:Ted Cruz has had his country of birth called into question.
 

  Ted Cruz exposed Katie Couric earlier this week.   Yet another reason why I'm proud to support Ted Cruz's Presidential Campaign:

 

  http://dailysurge.com/2015/07/cruz-destr...-movement/

 

  Cruz DESTROYS Couric: Hillary Started the Anti-Obama Birther Movement


 07.01.2015 | Alicia Powe |



Reply


Quote:Anti-American radicals? So you're drinking that Kool-Aid, too?


Obama posted a copy of his birth certificate on the internet in 2008.


If you want to believe something, it's easy to take a few prejudiced suspicions and mold them into "facts."


Obaam didn't post his certificate until 2010. He's still never posted his college transcripts. His parents were 60s Anti-American radicals. These aren't assumptions, they're historical facts.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:Obaam didn't post his certificate until 2010. He's still never posted his college transcripts. His parents were 60s Anti-American radicals. These aren't assumptions, they're historical facts.
 

He released it in 2008

Reply


Quote:Obaam didn't post his certificate until 2010. He's still never posted his college transcripts. His parents were 60s Anti-American radicals. These aren't assumptions, they're historical facts.
They'd be so proud of the way he's spent the last seven years bringing down the country.

 

Oh, wait...

Reply

(This post was last modified: 07-02-2015, 05:50 PM by rollerjag.)

Quote:Obaam didn't post his certificate until 2010. He's still never posted his college transcripts. His parents were 60s Anti-American radicals. These aren't assumptions, they're historical facts.
 

 

His campaign posted his birth certificate on the web in 2008.

 

Define anti-American radicals. His father was educated in the U.S. but spent most of the 60s working as an economist in the Kenyan government. I suppose a bureaucrat in a socialist government is technically anti-American in a John Birch mindset. His mother was also well educated, and has an impressive resume. We're talking about two people who attended American universities in the early 60s. If they are anti-American radicals because they may have espoused some anti-government ideas, Tea Partyers are anti-American radicals, too.

 

George Bush didn't post his transcripts, either. So? What does that have to do with his citizenship?


If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply


Quote:How do you make the distinction between "generally opposed" and "don't agree morally/religiously"?

 

If a person doesn't want to do their job, they should be free to quit. I wonder how many of those serving on the morality police force had similar reservations over issuing marriage licenses to, say, potential spousal abusers.
You can usually tell the difference between the two. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:If someone is hired into a government job to issue marriage licenses and they refuse to do so, why should they be allowed to continue drawing a check against taxpayer dollars? Should a DMV clerk be allowed to refuse to issue driver's licenses to teenagers because they believe that no one should be allowed to drive until they graduate from high school?
That's not a moral/religious reason. That's a personal preference.

Reply

(This post was last modified: 07-02-2015, 09:25 PM by americus 2.0.)

My beliefs are my beliefs. I guess we can agree to disagree. 


Reply


Quote:If someone is hired into a government job to issue marriage licenses and they refuse to do so, why should they be allowed to continue drawing a check against taxpayer dollars? Should a DMV clerk be allowed to refuse to issue driver's licenses to teenagers because they believe that no one should be allowed to drive until they graduate from high school?

If someone is hired into any job, they do what they're employer tells them or they don't have that job anymore.   Seems pretty simple to me.


It's basically saying "Discrimination is okay so long as it's religious."  I mean what happens if Bob and Joe issue marriage certificates, and both happen to refuse a gay couple a marriage certificate.  What happens then?  Are the gay couple unable to get married because employees decided that their religion is more important than someone else's rights.  They should not be working there.  


You have your rights until it interferes with someone else's rights.

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply


Quote:You have your rights until it interferes with someone else's rights.
This, pretty much. If a government clerk doesn't want to issue a marriage license to a gay couple, they should turn in their resignation (and their cushy benefits and pension plan) and try to avoid letting the door hit them in the tailpipe on the way out.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:You have your rights until it interferes with someone else's rights.
 

How is that any different than asking a Christian / Muslim baker to bake a homosexual wedding cake?

Reply

(This post was last modified: 07-03-2015, 08:10 AM by EricC85.)

Quote:How is that any different than asking a Christian / Muslim baker to bake a homosexual wedding cake?
It's not, that's where the left goes off track. Absolutely government employees don't have the authority to decide which laws they should enforce. You work for the government you issue the licenses regardless of how it makes you feel. Now If you own your own business and don't want to offer services for gay weddings so be it.


Sadly while I'm all for marriage equality the next step is where I draw the line. The next political battle so to speak will be if private institutions or religious institutions have the right to refuse service.
[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Quote:This, pretty much. If a government clerk doesn't want to issue a marriage license to a gay couple, they should turn in their resignation (and their cushy benefits and pension plan) and try to avoid letting the door hit them in the tailpipe on the way out.
So, a person of faith shouldn't be permitted to have a government job? 

 

Really into the whole rights thing, aren't you?  Encouraging discrimination in hiring practices shows a real high level of tolerance.

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply


Quote:So, a person of faith shouldn't be permitted to have a government job? 

 

Really into the whole rights thing, aren't you?  Encouraging discrimination in hiring practices shows a real high level of tolerance.
 

Quite a leap there. And one that nobody has said.

;

;
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:  Ted Cruz exposed Katie Couric earlier this week.   Yet another reason why I'm proud to support Ted Cruz's Presidential Campaign:

 

  http://dailysurge.com/2015/07/cruz-destr...-movement/

 

  Cruz DESTROYS Couric: Hillary Started the Anti-Obama Birther Movement


 07.01.2015 | Alicia Powe |
 

LOL, just watching her reaction is priceless.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply


Quote:So, a person of faith shouldn't be permitted to have a government job?


Really into the whole rights thing, aren't you? Encouraging discrimination in hiring practices shows a real high level of tolerance.
If the person's faith prohibits them from doing the job then they should change, not the job, and I say this as a person of deep faith. Now if the person of faith owns the business then it's their business and forcing them to change is a violation of their rights. Ownership rights should always trump customer rights, but we've got that backwards in our society with all these accommodation laws. The weakening of personal private property rights will be what destroys our civilization, eventually it will lead to the government owning everything, in practice if not in fact.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


Quote:You have your rights until it interferes with someone else's rights.
 

So do the rights of this couple matter?  Should they, via their private business be forced to do something that is against their belief?  Is it fair to fine them $135,000 and award it to the gay couple because of the "emotional suffering" the gay couple supposedly experienced?



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!