Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Dan Skuta got blocked in the dirt a couple times

#41

Quote:If you base your track record solely on what a player acomplishes in his first 4 seasons, then the probability is that you are going to miss out on a lot of good players.
 

im failing to see the plethora of good players in the NFL who played so little in their first four years.  not that ive done extensive research on it, i honestly just cant think of many players like this.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

James Harrison didn't do nothing his first 4 yrs. Former defensive MVP
Reply

#43

Aaron Rodgers' starts in his first 3 years: 0
Reply

#44

Quote:Aaron Rodgers' starts in his first 3 years: 0


Also a first round draft pick and declared starter in waiting
Reply

#45

Quote:James Harrison didn't do nothing his first 4 yrs. Former defensive MVP


Good example. Any others?
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46

This is what Otto can look like in this scheme, when you put a guy on or near the LOS who is 50lb lighter than his opponent.

 

Linebackers getting blocked by OL and TEs?

 

Who would have ever imagined...?

 

Traditional backers and schemes rely on DL to keep them clean.  Not so for Otto.


"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

#47

Does he have 26 tackles in his career? Am I reading this correctly? With 5 sacks?


Can't be
Reply

#48

Skuta needs the starting DL in front of him before we should try to judge his performance.  He is key in the run fits but the DL has to do their job too.


Reply

#49

Yeah I won't make a judgment good or bad until the preseason is over and we see him playing with the starting d-line. I don't startle too quick.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#50

Quote:Skuta needs the starting DL in front of him before we should try to judge his performance.  He is key in the run fits but the DL has to do their job too.
There you go again with that logic. How are their knees supposed to jerk if you keep interjecting logic into all of this.

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 




Reply

#51

Jimmy Smith played sparingly with the Cowboys and was out of football when the Jags signed him. He had 22 receptions in 16 games his first season here.

“Motivation alone is not enough.  If you have an idiot and you motivate him,now you have a motivated idiot.” Jim Rohn

 
Reply

#52

Quote:Jimmy Smith played sparingly with the Cowboys and was out of football when the Jags signed him. He had 22 receptions in 16 games his first season here.
 

A great story that is extremely rare.

Reply

#53

Quote:A great story that is extremely rare.
His teammate and fellow probowler, Keenan McCardell, wasn't a full time starter until his 6th season. Paul Spicer played sparingly his first 6 years and turned into an excellent player.

 

There are plenty of examples out there.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#54

Quote:His teammate and fellow probowler, Keenan McCardell, wasn't a full time starter until his 6th season. Paul Spicer played sparingly his first 6 years and turned into an excellent player.


There are plenty of examples out there.


I still say those are exceptions to the norm
Reply

#55

Quote:I still say those are exceptions to the norm
 

So what?  I don't even get what you're questioning.  So nobody should ever take a risk on a player then?  I guess that's the gist.  Get over it already.

[Image: IMG-2758.jpg]
Reply

#56

We took a risk on Mark Brunell and Jeff Lageman also
Reply

#57

Quote:We took a risk on Mark Brunell and Jeff Lageman also


And Marks
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#58

Quote:So what? I don't even get what you're questioning. So nobody should ever take a risk on a player then? I guess that's the gist. Get over it already.


Maybe backup a few pages. The point of this thread is about his arguably poor performance. I said maybe he is not that good, and odds are he isn't. To which certain people want to argue about. If you can't handle the argument, get out.
Reply

#59

Quote:And Marks


Marks was a well established starter.
Reply

#60

Quote:Marks was a well established starter.


I guess. I looked at him more from production than starts.
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!