The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
JAGUARS VS. PANTHERS PREDICTIONS
|
Quote:If we score 44 I will be ecstatic. I think it will be a little closer but hell if they do not count on the run as much with our receivers I can see us scoring quite a bit. I think If the Jags come out and start pushing the ball down the field it is going to be a long day for the Panthers.HER WE GO!!!!!^^^^^^ THATS WHAT IM TALKIN BOUT!!!! GONNA BE A LONG DAY FOR THE LITTLE CATS... BIG CATS ON DA PROWL We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Your defense ranked 17th in points allowed and 23rd in rushing yards allowed. Quit acting like your defense is the 85 bears.This. Their front 7 is good but their secondary sucks. Our Bortles and our WRs can pick them apart.
Quote:1. they appear to be "soft". You have heard of Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis, right?
Quote:This. Their front 7 is good but their secondary sucks. Our Bortles and our WRs can pick them apart.If our offensive line can protect Bortles, then yes, he can pick apart their secondary. I think he has improved enough. Who will Joeckel be going against? Charles Johnson?
No commercial messages in sigs
Quote:You have heard of Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis, right?watch the pre season. I scoured the lil cats message boards and found people comfortable with both those guys abilities. but i saw zero fire in them in the ps. we shall see.... We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:You have heard of Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis, right?Yeah they good. Like I said, good first test for our offense. We can gauge where we are at.
No commercial messages in sigs
Quote:You have heard of Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis, right?yes i have.. see the link http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/K...e150360fcd Luke is coming back from an extended absence because of injury. he looked soft in pre season.
Quote:If our offensive line can protect Bortles, then yes, he can pick apart their secondary. I think he has improved enough. Who will Joeckel be going against? Charles Johnson?IDK who Lukes going against. Im sure they will game plan him as the weakest link in our o-line. we shall see. I believe BB5 is going to light the little cats up Quote:No way we get 31 points against that defense. I'm gonna go with 20-13, Jags. I think you're over-estimating their defense. They've got good linebackers but their backfield is very average and the way Blake's been playing I think we can take advantage there. It's up to the OL to give him some time. Obviously they'll score on us. I think 27-24 Jags.
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:watch the pre season. They barely played in the preseason. Is that really your measuring stick? Luke won rookie DROY and then DPOY his second year. And you think he's soft because of the preseason? C'mon man....
Quote:yes i have.. What? Luke isn't coming back from injury. Seriously.....do you even watch football?
Quote:They barely played in the preseason. Is that really your measuring stick? Luke won rookie DROY and then DPOY his second year. And you think he's soft because of the preseason? C'mon man....I KNOW hes soft. if he were in game condition he would have played regularly when their 1st team was out there. he didn't play much. youre right. he wasnt ready. is he ready now??? i dont think so. because he hasnt played much at all
Quote:What? Luke isn't coming back from injury.I know what the link told me. he got hurt he didnt play for an extended time last year. he played like 3 snaps this pre season. he can not be 100% http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/K...e150360fcd read the article from their site We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:I know what the link told me.please dont make this thread an overblown argument. i intended this to be fun
Quote:I know what the link told me.btw... were talking about a player for the panthers...NOT our luke
Quote:I know what the link told me. Yes....Luke Kuechly has never missed a game and has never left a game because of injury. You are wrong. and he only played sparingly in the preseason because of the coach's decision. You're wrong there, too. No one is arguing but someone is feeding you some bad info.
Ignorance has taken a new altitude and it's awesome.
I am not obliged to believe that the same God that endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forego their use. - Galileo
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Ignorance has taken a new altitude and it's awesome. I mean....I can't even figure out what that guy's talking about. First he says our LBs are soft. Then he says Luke has missed extended time because of injury. What in the heck.....
Quote:Yes....Luke Kuechly has never missed a game and has never left a game because of injury. You are wrong. and he only played sparingly in the preseason because of the coach's decision. You're wrong there, too. No one is arguing but someone is feeding you some bad info.hmmm mm... the link says he was hurt and missed a bunch of time....its right from their local newspaper i think
Quote:Yes....Luke Kuechly has never missed a game and has never left a game because of injury. You are wrong. and he only played sparingly in the preseason because of the coach's decision. You're wrong there, too. No one is arguing but someone is feeding you some bad info.ok. you were correct. It was misinformation i read... my bad.... |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.