The reason why I don't think Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush will be on the same ticket is they both are from Florida.   As important as winning Florida is for the Republicans chances in the 2016 Presidential Election,    having more regional variety on the ticket probably is the more likely outcome.    I'm not a fan of John Kasich but if he can win Ohio as the VP Nominee for a good candidate at the top of the ticket,   that option has to seriously be considered.

 

You're right as far as the regional aspect, and I wasn't thinking about Rubio and Bush both being from Florida.  My "dream" ticket would be Rubio/Fiorina.  Both are very forward thinking and very optimistic.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

You're right as far as the regional aspect, and I wasn't thinking about Rubio and Bush both being from Florida. My "dream" ticket would be Rubio/Fiorina. Both are very forward thinking and very optimistic.

Rubio I'll give you, but how is wanting to start a second Cold War "forward thinking"?

---

Rubio I'll give you, but how is wanting to start a second Cold War "forward thinking"?

 

LOL.  I like how Carly Fiorina wants to bring our military back to what it once was.  I don't see that as "starting a second Cold War" at all.

 

Regarding her forward thinking, she has often talked about using today's technology for people to be engaged.  On the other hand, Hillary Clinton claims that she doesn't know how to use a smart phone, email or a computer.  Supposedly she just figured out instagram, but I find it amazing that she is able to supposedly tweet.  So which of the two ladies running is being more honest and is more forward thinking?

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

LOL.  I like how Carly Fiorina wants to bring our military back to what it once was.  I don't see that as "starting a second Cold War" at all.

 

Regarding her forward thinking, she has often talked about using today's technology for people to be engaged.  On the other hand, Hillary Clinton claims that she doesn't know how to use a smart phone, email or a computer.  Supposedly she just figured out instagram, but I find it amazing that she is able to supposedly tweet.  So which of the two ladies running is being more honest and is more forward thinking?

 

What does it mean to bring the military back to what it once was? Back to 2010 levels where it was at it highest budgetary level? Was the military really that much more imposing in 2010 than it was now? The military doesn't need more money. It needs effective leadership. The president does not have effective military leaders in top positions. Get people in those positions, build morale, and the military will be much better off, without spending an extra 100b.

 

---

1. Cruz

2. Rand

 

big dropoff

 

 

everyone else

---

What does it mean to bring the military back to what it once was? Back to 2010 levels where it was at it highest budgetary level? Was the military really that much more imposing in 2010 than it was now? The military doesn't need more money. It needs effective leadership. The president does not have effective military leaders in top positions. Get people in those positions, build morale, and the military will be much better off, without spending an extra 100b.

 

 

I won't argue that military spending is a problem.  I know first hand that it is.  However, I will argue that military presence throughout the world and capability is drastically reduced right now.

 

The problem is, our military used to be one of the most advanced in the world and had a presence.  That has changed a lot over the years.  The military is ill equipped, not trained as well as it used to be and not as powerful as it once was.

 

I wish that I could give an example, but that's not really something that I need to be posting on a public forum.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

LOL. I like how Carly Fiorina wants to bring our military back to what it once was. I don't see that as "starting a second Cold War" at all.


Regarding her forward thinking, she has often talked about using today's technology for people to be engaged. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton claims that she doesn't know how to use a smart phone, email or a computer. Supposedly she just figured out instagram, but I find it amazing that she is able to supposedly tweet. So which of the two ladies running is being more honest and is more forward thinking?

First off, I apologize for the forthcoming rapid fire replies. Mobile doesn't support multi quoting, and my laptop is, well, somewhere. Amidst all the boxes. Maybe in the Uhaul already. Crap.


Second, when have I ever indicated that I like our respect Hillary Clinton in any way? If it were down to Fiorina and Clinton, Hillary would win, but I wouldn't care. I'd have begun exploring the cost of land in Saskatchewan immediately after the conventions.

---

What does it mean to bring the military back to what it once was? Back to 2010 levels where it was at it highest budgetary level? Was the military really that much more imposing in 2010 than it was now? The military doesn't need more money. It needs effective leadership. The president does not have effective military leaders in top positions. Get people in those positions, build morale, and the military will be much better off, without spending an extra 100b.

Everybody take a couple grand to the casino and put it all on black. Warrior and I agree on something.

---

You're right as far as the regional aspect, and I wasn't thinking about Rubio and Bush both being from Florida.  My "dream" ticket would be Rubio/Fiorina.  Both are very forward thinking and very optimistic.

 

     If Ted Cruz falls out of the race and as expected Mike Huckabee's campaign doesn't gain enough traction,   I'm more likely than not going to support Marco Rubio for the nomination.  You have much more confidence in Carly Fiorina than I do.   But if she turns out to be the nominee,  I probably will vote for her instead of a 3rd Party or write in candidate because of the ultra concern of whoever the Democrats choose as their nominee.  

---

So my g/f and I currently live in Wisconsin. I am currently registered in my hometown, which is in Michigan, but use the Wisconsin address as my permanent address. She isn't a registered voter and uses her parents address in Indianapolis as her permanent address. By November 2016, we will likely be living back in Michigan. What is the best way for us to be able to vote in the Republican primary?

---

So my g/f and I currently live in Wisconsin. I am currently registered in my hometown, which is in Michigan, but use the Wisconsin address as my permanent address. She isn't a registered voter and uses her parents address in Indianapolis as her permanent address. By November 2016, we will likely be living back in Michigan. What is the best way for us to be able to vote in the Republican primary?

 

    It's probably best to contact that Michigan Secretary of State office with your questions:

 

      http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127...--,00.html

 

     If I were to take a guess though,  you will be able to still vote in Michigan but your g/f will only be able to vote in Indiana until she has an address in Michigan.   Unless of course she has proof of residence in Wisconsin and can register there if she chooses.. 

---

So my g/f and I currently live in Wisconsin. I am currently registered in my hometown, which is in Michigan, but use the Wisconsin address as my permanent address. She isn't a registered voter and uses her parents address in Indianapolis as her permanent address. By November 2016, we will likely be living back in Michigan. What is the best way for us to be able to vote in the Republican primary?

 

If you were Democrat I'd say just vote in both states.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

So my g/f and I currently live in Wisconsin. I am currently registered in my hometown, which is in Michigan, but use the Wisconsin address as my permanent address. She isn't a registered voter and uses her parents address in Indianapolis as her permanent address. By November 2016, we will likely be living back in Michigan. What is the best way for us to be able to vote in the Republican primary?

 

As far as the primary, I guess that it depends on where you are living when that happens.  Where do you intend to live permanently?  (At least for the foreseeable future).  I would suggest voting in the Michigan primary, since that's where you are projected to live during the general election.  I would suggest that she registers in Michigan (assuming you two will be together next November).

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

So my g/f and I currently live in Wisconsin. I am currently registered in my hometown, which is in Michigan, but use the Wisconsin address as my permanent address. She isn't a registered voter and uses her parents address in Indianapolis as her permanent address. By November 2016, we will likely be living back in Michigan. What is the best way for us to be able to vote in the Republican primary?

Different states have different laws about how quickly you can vote after registering. D6's advice is solid.

---

Im a dem and that's funny FLR SPRTS GD

---

And cause I was a gazillionaire, and I liked doin it so much, I cut that grass for free.

D6, do you think Cruz (or any other Republican) is more electable than Rubio going forward?

---

D6, do you think Cruz (or any other Republican) is more electable than Rubio going forward?

 

  That's a good question.

 

  I think that Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are the two most electable Republicans in the field.   I don't think the country wants another Bush.  John Kasich is not Conservative enough to get the base of the party out to vote.    Donald Trump,  Carly Fiorina,  and Ben Carson will all likely be exposed in the general election campaign. 

 

  It seems close between Cruz and Rubio in terms of what candidate is more electable.  Cruz probably has more support amongst Conservatives.   Rubio probably has more support amongst those considered Moderates,  including Independents.    I think both have great communication skills.    I'm interested to see what happens in the next few months leading up to the debates.  At that time,  I think the answer to your question will be clearer,  one way or the other.   I'm focused in my support for Ted Cruz but barring something totally unexpected,  I will vote for Marco Rubio if he wins the Republican Nomination.     Hopefully,  both candidates will get plenty of air time in future debates.   

---

  That's a good question.

 

  I think that Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are the two most electable Republicans in the field.   I don't think the country wants another Bush.  John Kasich is not Conservative enough to get the base of the party out to vote.    Donald Trump,  Carly Fiorina,  and Ben Carson will all likely be exposed in the general election campaign. 

 

  It seems close between Cruz and Rubio in terms of what candidate is more electable.  Cruz probably has more support amongst Conservatives.   Rubio probably has more support amongst those considered Moderates,  including Independents.    I think both have great communication skills.    I'm interested to see what happens in the next few months leading up to the debates.  At that time,  I think the answer to your question will be clearer,  one way or the other.   I'm focused in my support for Ted Cruz but barring something totally unexpected,  I will vote for Marco Rubio if he wins the Republican Nomination.     Hopefully,  both candidates will get plenty of air time in future debates.   

 

Right on. I'm buying into Rubio. The more I get into this, the more I think that a Rubio/Kasich campaign would be great. I think it's a great way to get far-right conservatives and moderates on board while giving the GOP their best hope for Florida and Ohio.

 

I think Cruz might be too polarizing to independents. While Rubio is also far right, I feel like he resonates more with independent voters or moderate democrats that are hesitant about Hillary and/or Bernie.

---

Right on. I'm buying into Rubio. The more I get into this, the more I think that a Rubio/Kasich campaign would be great. I think it's a great way to get far-right conservatives and moderates on board while giving the GOP their best hope for Florida and Ohio.

 

I think Cruz might be too polarizing to independents. While Rubio is also far right, I feel like he resonates more with independent voters or moderate democrats that are hesitant about Hillary and/or Bernie.

 

I agree with you on Rubio, he's been my choice from the start, especially after reading his two books.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

I agree with you on Rubio, he's been my choice from the start, especially after reading his two books.

 

Do you think that the republican base will overlook his amnesty ordeal if it looks like Rubio is the best option at keeping Hillary or Bernie out of office?

---